From: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
To: kexec@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v6 1/4] kexec: clean up arch_kexec_kernel_verify_sig
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2022 09:40:36 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YlzBlPWXWeg6ABen@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220415093735.74eusyuuboa32aqs@Rk>
On 04/15/22 at 05:37pm, Coiby Xu wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 11:44:25AM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> > On 04/14/22 at 09:43am, Coiby Xu wrote:
> > > Currently there is no arch-specific implementation of
> > > arch_kexec_kernel_verify_sig. Even if we want to add an implementation
> > > for an architecture in the future, we can simply use "(struct
> > > kexec_file_ops*)->verify_sig". So clean it up.
> > >
> > > Suggested-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
> > > Cc: stable at kernel.org
> >
> > It should be not worth noticing stable kernel that a clean up patch need
> > be back ported.
>
> Thanks for the suggestion! For the 2nd and 3rd patch, I'll add prerequisite
> info,
>
> Cc: stable at kernel.org # 34d5960af253: kexec: clean up arch_kexec_kernel_verify_sig
>
> and
>
> Cc: stable at kernel.org # 34d5960af253: kexec: clean up arch_kexec_kernel_verify_sig
> Cc: stable at kernel.org # 83b7bb2d49ae: kexec, KEYS: make the code in bzImage64_verify_sig generic
>
> respectively.
That sounds good, thx.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
To: Coiby Xu <coxu@redhat.com>
Cc: kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Michal Suchanek <msuchanek@suse.de>,
Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
"Eric W . Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>, Chun-Yi Lee <jlee@suse.com>,
stable@kernel.org, open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/4] kexec: clean up arch_kexec_kernel_verify_sig
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2022 09:40:36 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YlzBlPWXWeg6ABen@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220415093735.74eusyuuboa32aqs@Rk>
On 04/15/22 at 05:37pm, Coiby Xu wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 11:44:25AM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> > On 04/14/22 at 09:43am, Coiby Xu wrote:
> > > Currently there is no arch-specific implementation of
> > > arch_kexec_kernel_verify_sig. Even if we want to add an implementation
> > > for an architecture in the future, we can simply use "(struct
> > > kexec_file_ops*)->verify_sig". So clean it up.
> > >
> > > Suggested-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
> > > Cc: stable@kernel.org
> >
> > It should be not worth noticing stable kernel that a clean up patch need
> > be back ported.
>
> Thanks for the suggestion! For the 2nd and 3rd patch, I'll add prerequisite
> info,
>
> Cc: stable@kernel.org # 34d5960af253: kexec: clean up arch_kexec_kernel_verify_sig
>
> and
>
> Cc: stable@kernel.org # 34d5960af253: kexec: clean up arch_kexec_kernel_verify_sig
> Cc: stable@kernel.org # 83b7bb2d49ae: kexec, KEYS: make the code in bzImage64_verify_sig generic
>
> respectively.
That sounds good, thx.
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
To: Coiby Xu <coxu@redhat.com>
Cc: kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Michal Suchanek <msuchanek@suse.de>,
Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
"Eric W . Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>, Chun-Yi Lee <jlee@suse.com>,
stable@kernel.org, open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/4] kexec: clean up arch_kexec_kernel_verify_sig
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2022 09:40:36 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YlzBlPWXWeg6ABen@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220415093735.74eusyuuboa32aqs@Rk>
On 04/15/22 at 05:37pm, Coiby Xu wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 11:44:25AM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> > On 04/14/22 at 09:43am, Coiby Xu wrote:
> > > Currently there is no arch-specific implementation of
> > > arch_kexec_kernel_verify_sig. Even if we want to add an implementation
> > > for an architecture in the future, we can simply use "(struct
> > > kexec_file_ops*)->verify_sig". So clean it up.
> > >
> > > Suggested-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
> > > Cc: stable@kernel.org
> >
> > It should be not worth noticing stable kernel that a clean up patch need
> > be back ported.
>
> Thanks for the suggestion! For the 2nd and 3rd patch, I'll add prerequisite
> info,
>
> Cc: stable@kernel.org # 34d5960af253: kexec: clean up arch_kexec_kernel_verify_sig
>
> and
>
> Cc: stable@kernel.org # 34d5960af253: kexec: clean up arch_kexec_kernel_verify_sig
> Cc: stable@kernel.org # 83b7bb2d49ae: kexec, KEYS: make the code in bzImage64_verify_sig generic
>
> respectively.
That sounds good, thx.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-18 1:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-14 1:43 [PATCH v6 0/4] use more system keyrings to verify arm64 and s390 kexec kernel image signature Coiby Xu
2022-04-14 1:43 ` Coiby Xu
2022-04-14 1:43 ` [PATCH v6 1/4] kexec: clean up arch_kexec_kernel_verify_sig Coiby Xu
2022-04-14 1:43 ` Coiby Xu
2022-04-14 1:43 ` Coiby Xu
2022-04-14 3:44 ` Baoquan He
2022-04-14 3:44 ` Baoquan He
2022-04-14 3:44 ` Baoquan He
2022-04-15 9:37 ` Coiby Xu
2022-04-15 9:37 ` Coiby Xu
2022-04-15 9:37 ` Coiby Xu
2022-04-18 1:40 ` Baoquan He [this message]
2022-04-18 1:40 ` Baoquan He
2022-04-18 1:40 ` Baoquan He
2022-04-14 1:43 ` [PATCH v6 2/4] kexec, KEYS: make the code in bzImage64_verify_sig generic Coiby Xu
2022-04-14 1:43 ` Coiby Xu
2022-04-14 1:43 ` Coiby Xu
2022-04-18 1:53 ` Baoquan He
2022-04-18 1:53 ` Baoquan He
2022-04-18 1:53 ` Baoquan He
2022-04-18 5:42 ` Coiby Xu
2022-04-18 5:42 ` Coiby Xu
2022-04-18 5:42 ` Coiby Xu
2022-04-14 1:43 ` [PATCH v6 3/4] arm64: kexec_file: use more system keyrings to verify kernel image signature Coiby Xu
2022-04-14 1:43 ` Coiby Xu
2022-04-14 1:43 ` Coiby Xu
2022-04-18 2:14 ` Baoquan He
2022-04-18 2:14 ` Baoquan He
2022-04-18 2:14 ` Baoquan He
2022-04-18 5:46 ` Coiby Xu
2022-04-18 5:46 ` Coiby Xu
2022-04-18 5:46 ` Coiby Xu
2022-04-14 1:43 ` [PATCH v6 4/4] kexec, KEYS, s390: Make use of built-in and secondary keyring for signature verification Coiby Xu
2022-04-14 1:43 ` Coiby Xu
2022-04-14 1:43 ` Coiby Xu
2022-04-18 2:11 ` Baoquan He
2022-04-18 2:11 ` Baoquan He
2022-04-18 2:11 ` Baoquan He
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YlzBlPWXWeg6ABen@MiWiFi-R3L-srv \
--to=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.