[f2fs-dev] Baseline for f2fs

[f2fs-dev] Baseline for f2fs

[Luis Chamberlain]

I'm going to add automation support for f2fs within kdevops [0]. This
should enable folks to test for regressions for f2fs from scratch with
just a few commands. Before I go ahead and add that I was curious if
folks have a known baseline of known failures from fstests for f2fs so
I can expunge the known issues for now. Is there a tracker where these
are kept as well?

Thanks!

  Luis

[0] https://github.com/mcgrof/kdevops


_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

Re: [f2fs-dev] Baseline for f2fs

[Jaegeuk Kim]

On 04/19, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> I'm going to add automation support for f2fs within kdevops [0]. This
> should enable folks to test for regressions for f2fs from scratch with
> just a few commands. Before I go ahead and add that I was curious if
> folks have a known baseline of known failures from fstests for f2fs so
> I can expunge the known issues for now. Is there a tracker where these
> are kept as well?

Well, I'm not sure what fstests will run. Is that based on xfstests?

> 
> Thanks!
> 
>   Luis
> 
> [0] https://github.com/mcgrof/kdevops


_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

Re: [f2fs-dev] Baseline for f2fs

[Luis Chamberlain]

On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 3:42 PM Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On 04/19, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> > I'm going to add automation support for f2fs within kdevops [0]. This
> > should enable folks to test for regressions for f2fs from scratch with
> > just a few commands. Before I go ahead and add that I was curious if
> > folks have a known baseline of known failures from fstests for f2fs so
> > I can expunge the known issues for now. Is there a tracker where these
> > are kept as well?
>
> Well, I'm not sure what fstests will run. Is that based on xfstests?

Yes. I call it fstests only because I'm tired of attending LSFMMs
where folks don't realize that xfstests is used to test any
filesystem. So I figured we need to rebrand it.

 Luis


_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

Re: [f2fs-dev] Baseline for f2fs

[Jaegeuk Kim]

On 04/19, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 3:42 PM Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On 04/19, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> > > I'm going to add automation support for f2fs within kdevops [0]. This
> > > should enable folks to test for regressions for f2fs from scratch with
> > > just a few commands. Before I go ahead and add that I was curious if
> > > folks have a known baseline of known failures from fstests for f2fs so
> > > I can expunge the known issues for now. Is there a tracker where these
> > > are kept as well?
> >
> > Well, I'm not sure what fstests will run. Is that based on xfstests?
> 
> Yes. I call it fstests only because I'm tired of attending LSFMMs
> where folks don't realize that xfstests is used to test any
> filesystem. So I figured we need to rebrand it.

I see. This is what I modified a bit based on xfstests for f2fs.

https://github.com/jaegeuk/xfstests-f2fs/commits/f2fs

Thanks,

> 
>  Luis


_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

Re: [f2fs-dev] Baseline for f2fs

[Luis Chamberlain]

On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 4:03 PM Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On 04/19, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 3:42 PM Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On 04/19, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> > > > I'm going to add automation support for f2fs within kdevops [0]. This
> > > > should enable folks to test for regressions for f2fs from scratch with
> > > > just a few commands. Before I go ahead and add that I was curious if
> > > > folks have a known baseline of known failures from fstests for f2fs so
> > > > I can expunge the known issues for now. Is there a tracker where these
> > > > are kept as well?
> > >
> > > Well, I'm not sure what fstests will run. Is that based on xfstests?
> >
> > Yes. I call it fstests only because I'm tired of attending LSFMMs
> > where folks don't realize that xfstests is used to test any
> > filesystem. So I figured we need to rebrand it.
>
> I see. This is what I modified a bit based on xfstests for f2fs.
>
> https://github.com/jaegeuk/xfstests-f2fs/commits/f2fs

Oh... so this is not upstream...  I see.. ok hrm..

 Luis


_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

Re: [f2fs-dev] Baseline for f2fs

[Luis Chamberlain]

On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 4:26 PM Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org> wrote:
> Oh... so this is not upstream...  I see.. ok hrm..

Any plans to try to upstream your delta?

  Luis


_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

Re: [f2fs-dev] Baseline for f2fs

[Jaegeuk Kim]

On 04/19, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 4:26 PM Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org> wrote:
> > Oh... so this is not upstream...  I see.. ok hrm..
> 
> Any plans to try to upstream your delta?

Not for now. :)

> 
>   Luis


_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

Re: [f2fs-dev] Baseline for f2fs

[Luis Chamberlain]

On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 11:12:33AM -0700, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On 04/19, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 4:26 PM Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > Oh... so this is not upstream...  I see.. ok hrm..
> > 
> > Any plans to try to upstream your delta?
> 
> Not for now. :)

Why not ? :)

In any case I can *cake* in a custom git for fstests when f2fs is selected.
In other words, I can add support for this hack for kdevops for f2fs, but it
sure would be nice if that delta disappared.

  Luis


_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel