From: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
To: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com>
Cc: pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com,
alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com,
cujomalainey@google.com, ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com,
lgirdwood@gmail.com, senozhatsky@chromium.org,
broonie@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ASoC: SOF: ipc3-topology: Correct get_control_data for non bytes payload
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2022 22:08:10 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YmlAOm7AlZGpQLPS@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220427124025.14615-1-peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com>
On (22/04/27 15:40), Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> It is possible to craft a topology where sof_get_control_data() would do
> out of bounds access because it expects that it is only called when the
> payload is bytes type.
> Confusingly it also handles other types of controls, but the payload
> parsing implementation is only valid for bytes.
>
> Fix the code to count the non bytes controls and instead of storing a
> pointer to sof_abi_hdr in sof_widget_data (which is only valid for bytes),
> store the pointer to the data itself and add a new member to save the size
> of the data.
>
> In case of non bytes controls we store the pointer to the chanv itself,
> which is just an array of values at the end.
>
> In case of bytes control, drop the wrong cdata->data (wdata[i].pdata) check
> against NULL since it is incorrect and invalid in this context.
> The data is pointing to the end of cdata struct, so it should never be
> null.
>
> Reported-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> Hi,
>
> Changes since v2:
> - Drop the cdata->data check against NULL as it is not a valid test and since we
> are in sof_get_control_data() the memory has been already allocated
>
> changes since v1:
> - adjust the payload size for non bytes controls by subtracting the size of the
> sof_ipc_ctrl_data struct, plus add comment to note this
A corresponding 5.10 backport that "works on my computer".
I also have a 5.4 backport but it's entirely untested.
---
sound/soc/sof/topology.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/sof/topology.c b/sound/soc/sof/topology.c
index c1fc7bcf4eb5..04a721f9a7f9 100644
--- a/sound/soc/sof/topology.c
+++ b/sound/soc/sof/topology.c
@@ -50,7 +50,8 @@
struct sof_widget_data {
int ctrl_type;
int ipc_cmd;
- struct sof_abi_hdr *pdata;
+ void *pdata;
+ size_t pdata_size;
struct snd_sof_control *control;
};
@@ -2100,6 +2101,7 @@ static int sof_get_control_data(struct snd_soc_component *scomp,
size_t *size)
{
const struct snd_kcontrol_new *kc;
+ struct sof_ipc_ctrl_data *cdata;
struct soc_mixer_control *sm;
struct soc_bytes_ext *sbe;
struct soc_enum *se;
@@ -2136,16 +2138,25 @@ static int sof_get_control_data(struct snd_soc_component *scomp,
return -EINVAL;
}
- wdata[i].pdata = wdata[i].control->control_data->data;
- if (!wdata[i].pdata)
- return -EINVAL;
+ cdata = wdata[i].control->control_data;
+ if (widget->dobj.widget.kcontrol_type[i] == SND_SOC_TPLG_TYPE_BYTES) {
+ if (cdata->data->magic != SOF_ABI_MAGIC)
+ return -EINVAL;
- /* make sure data is valid - data can be updated at runtime */
- if (widget->dobj.widget.kcontrol_type[i] == SND_SOC_TPLG_TYPE_BYTES &&
- wdata[i].pdata->magic != SOF_ABI_MAGIC)
- return -EINVAL;
+ wdata[i].pdata = cdata->data->data;
+ wdata[i].pdata_size = cdata->data->size;
+ } else {
+ /* points to the control data union */
+ wdata[i].pdata = cdata->chanv;
+ /*
+ * wdata[i].control->size is calculated with struct_size
+ * and includes the size of struct sof_ipc_ctrl_data
+ */
+ wdata[i].pdata_size = wdata[i].control->size -
+ sizeof(struct sof_ipc_ctrl_data);
+ }
- *size += wdata[i].pdata->size;
+ *size += wdata[i].pdata_size;
/* get data type */
switch (wdata[i].control->cmd) {
@@ -2236,10 +2247,12 @@ static int sof_process_load(struct snd_soc_component *scomp, int index,
*/
if (ipc_data_size) {
for (i = 0; i < widget->num_kcontrols; i++) {
- memcpy(&process->data + offset,
- wdata[i].pdata->data,
- wdata[i].pdata->size);
- offset += wdata[i].pdata->size;
+ if (!wdata[i].pdata_size)
+ continue;
+
+ memcpy(&process->data[offset], wdata[i].pdata,
+ wdata[i].pdata_size);
+ offset += wdata[i].pdata_size;
}
}
--
2.31.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-27 13:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-27 12:40 [PATCH v3] ASoC: SOF: ipc3-topology: Correct get_control_data for non bytes payload Peter Ujfalusi
2022-04-27 13:08 ` Sergey Senozhatsky [this message]
2022-04-27 13:09 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2022-04-27 13:26 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2022-04-27 13:13 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2022-04-27 13:20 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2022-04-27 18:47 ` Péter Ujfalusi
2022-04-28 2:19 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YmlAOm7AlZGpQLPS@google.com \
--to=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=cujomalainey@google.com \
--cc=kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.