* Re: [PATCH 2/5 v1] mm: add numa_count field for rss_stat
@ 2022-05-12 21:21 kernel test robot
2022-05-12 21:12 ` [RFC PATCH] mm: rss_stat_free() can be static kernel test robot
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2022-05-12 21:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kbuild
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 13101 bytes --]
CC: kbuild-all(a)lists.01.org
BCC: lkp(a)intel.com
In-Reply-To: <20220512044634.63586-3-ligang.bdlg@bytedance.com>
References: <20220512044634.63586-3-ligang.bdlg@bytedance.com>
TO: Gang Li <ligang.bdlg@bytedance.com>
TO: akpm(a)linux-foundation.org
CC: songmuchun(a)bytedance.com
CC: hca(a)linux.ibm.com
CC: gor(a)linux.ibm.com
CC: agordeev(a)linux.ibm.com
CC: borntraeger(a)linux.ibm.com
CC: svens(a)linux.ibm.com
CC: ebiederm(a)xmission.com
CC: keescook(a)chromium.org
CC: viro(a)zeniv.linux.org.uk
CC: rostedt(a)goodmis.org
CC: mingo(a)redhat.com
CC: peterz(a)infradead.org
CC: acme(a)kernel.org
CC: mark.rutland(a)arm.com
CC: alexander.shishkin(a)linux.intel.com
CC: jolsa(a)kernel.org
CC: namhyung(a)kernel.org
CC: david(a)redhat.com
CC: imbrenda(a)linux.ibm.com
CC: apopple(a)nvidia.com
CC: adobriyan(a)gmail.com
CC: stephen.s.brennan(a)oracle.com
CC: ohoono.kwon(a)samsung.com
CC: haolee.swjtu(a)gmail.com
CC: kaleshsingh(a)google.com
CC: zhengqi.arch(a)bytedance.com
CC: peterx(a)redhat.com
CC: shy828301(a)gmail.com
CC: surenb(a)google.com
Hi Gang,
Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:
[auto build test WARNING on s390/features]
[also build test WARNING on kees/for-next/execve tip/perf/core linus/master v5.18-rc6]
[cannot apply to akpm-mm/mm-everything rostedt-trace/for-next next-20220512]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Gang-Li/mm-oom-Introduce-per-numa-node-oom-for-CONSTRAINT_MEMORY_POLICY/20220512-124948
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/s390/linux.git features
:::::: branch date: 16 hours ago
:::::: commit date: 16 hours ago
config: x86_64-randconfig-s022 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220513/202205130551.e9BVkfHo-lkp(a)intel.com/config)
compiler: gcc-11 (Debian 11.2.0-20) 11.2.0
reproduce:
# apt-get install sparse
# sparse version: v0.6.4-dirty
# https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/3e724f844e3fe45cdffd9f359d140a424aeb462c
git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux
git fetch --no-tags linux-review Gang-Li/mm-oom-Introduce-per-numa-node-oom-for-CONSTRAINT_MEMORY_POLICY/20220512-124948
git checkout 3e724f844e3fe45cdffd9f359d140a424aeb462c
# save the config file
mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config
make W=1 C=1 CF='-fdiagnostic-prefix -D__CHECK_ENDIAN__' O=build_dir ARCH=x86_64 SHELL=/bin/bash
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
>> kernel/fork.c:1110:1: sparse: sparse: unused label 'free_stack'
>> kernel/fork.c:878:6: sparse: sparse: symbol 'rss_stat_free' was not declared. Should it be static?
kernel/fork.c:1366:24: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in initializer (different address spaces) @@ expected struct file [noderef] __rcu *__ret @@ got struct file *new_exe_file @@
kernel/fork.c:1366:24: sparse: expected struct file [noderef] __rcu *__ret
kernel/fork.c:1366:24: sparse: got struct file *new_exe_file
kernel/fork.c:1366:22: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in assignment (different address spaces) @@ expected struct file *[assigned] old_exe_file @@ got struct file [noderef] __rcu *[assigned] __ret @@
kernel/fork.c:1366:22: sparse: expected struct file *[assigned] old_exe_file
kernel/fork.c:1366:22: sparse: got struct file [noderef] __rcu *[assigned] __ret
kernel/fork.c:1697:38: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) @@ expected struct refcount_struct [usertype] *r @@ got struct refcount_struct [noderef] __rcu * @@
kernel/fork.c:1697:38: sparse: expected struct refcount_struct [usertype] *r
kernel/fork.c:1697:38: sparse: got struct refcount_struct [noderef] __rcu *
kernel/fork.c:1706:31: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) @@ expected struct spinlock [usertype] *lock @@ got struct spinlock [noderef] __rcu * @@
kernel/fork.c:1706:31: sparse: expected struct spinlock [usertype] *lock
kernel/fork.c:1706:31: sparse: got struct spinlock [noderef] __rcu *
kernel/fork.c:1707:9: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) @@ expected void const * @@ got struct k_sigaction [noderef] __rcu * @@
kernel/fork.c:1707:9: sparse: expected void const *
kernel/fork.c:1707:9: sparse: got struct k_sigaction [noderef] __rcu *
kernel/fork.c:1707:9: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) @@ expected void const * @@ got struct k_sigaction [noderef] __rcu * @@
kernel/fork.c:1707:9: sparse: expected void const *
kernel/fork.c:1707:9: sparse: got struct k_sigaction [noderef] __rcu *
kernel/fork.c:1707:9: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 2 (different address spaces) @@ expected void const * @@ got struct k_sigaction [noderef] __rcu * @@
kernel/fork.c:1707:9: sparse: expected void const *
kernel/fork.c:1707:9: sparse: got struct k_sigaction [noderef] __rcu *
kernel/fork.c:1708:33: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) @@ expected struct spinlock [usertype] *lock @@ got struct spinlock [noderef] __rcu * @@
kernel/fork.c:1708:33: sparse: expected struct spinlock [usertype] *lock
kernel/fork.c:1708:33: sparse: got struct spinlock [noderef] __rcu *
kernel/fork.c:1801:9: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) @@ expected struct qspinlock *lock @@ got struct qspinlock [noderef] __rcu * @@
kernel/fork.c:1801:9: sparse: expected struct qspinlock *lock
kernel/fork.c:1801:9: sparse: got struct qspinlock [noderef] __rcu *
kernel/fork.c:2120:31: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) @@ expected struct spinlock [usertype] *lock @@ got struct spinlock [noderef] __rcu * @@
kernel/fork.c:2120:31: sparse: expected struct spinlock [usertype] *lock
kernel/fork.c:2120:31: sparse: got struct spinlock [noderef] __rcu *
kernel/fork.c:2124:33: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) @@ expected struct spinlock [usertype] *lock @@ got struct spinlock [noderef] __rcu * @@
kernel/fork.c:2124:33: sparse: expected struct spinlock [usertype] *lock
kernel/fork.c:2124:33: sparse: got struct spinlock [noderef] __rcu *
kernel/fork.c:2443:32: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in assignment (different address spaces) @@ expected struct task_struct [noderef] __rcu *real_parent @@ got struct task_struct * @@
kernel/fork.c:2443:32: sparse: expected struct task_struct [noderef] __rcu *real_parent
kernel/fork.c:2443:32: sparse: got struct task_struct *
kernel/fork.c:2452:27: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) @@ expected struct spinlock [usertype] *lock @@ got struct spinlock [noderef] __rcu * @@
kernel/fork.c:2452:27: sparse: expected struct spinlock [usertype] *lock
kernel/fork.c:2452:27: sparse: got struct spinlock [noderef] __rcu *
kernel/fork.c:2497:54: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 2 (different address spaces) @@ expected struct list_head *head @@ got struct list_head [noderef] __rcu * @@
kernel/fork.c:2497:54: sparse: expected struct list_head *head
kernel/fork.c:2497:54: sparse: got struct list_head [noderef] __rcu *
kernel/fork.c:2518:29: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) @@ expected struct spinlock [usertype] *lock @@ got struct spinlock [noderef] __rcu * @@
kernel/fork.c:2518:29: sparse: expected struct spinlock [usertype] *lock
kernel/fork.c:2518:29: sparse: got struct spinlock [noderef] __rcu *
kernel/fork.c:2539:29: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) @@ expected struct spinlock [usertype] *lock @@ got struct spinlock [noderef] __rcu * @@
kernel/fork.c:2539:29: sparse: expected struct spinlock [usertype] *lock
kernel/fork.c:2539:29: sparse: got struct spinlock [noderef] __rcu *
kernel/fork.c:2566:28: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) @@ expected struct sighand_struct *sighand @@ got struct sighand_struct [noderef] __rcu *sighand @@
kernel/fork.c:2566:28: sparse: expected struct sighand_struct *sighand
kernel/fork.c:2566:28: sparse: got struct sighand_struct [noderef] __rcu *sighand
kernel/fork.c:2595:31: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) @@ expected struct spinlock [usertype] *lock @@ got struct spinlock [noderef] __rcu * @@
kernel/fork.c:2595:31: sparse: expected struct spinlock [usertype] *lock
kernel/fork.c:2595:31: sparse: got struct spinlock [noderef] __rcu *
kernel/fork.c:2597:33: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) @@ expected struct spinlock [usertype] *lock @@ got struct spinlock [noderef] __rcu * @@
kernel/fork.c:2597:33: sparse: expected struct spinlock [usertype] *lock
kernel/fork.c:2597:33: sparse: got struct spinlock [noderef] __rcu *
kernel/fork.c:3006:24: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in assignment (different address spaces) @@ expected struct task_struct *[assigned] parent @@ got struct task_struct [noderef] __rcu *real_parent @@
kernel/fork.c:3006:24: sparse: expected struct task_struct *[assigned] parent
kernel/fork.c:3006:24: sparse: got struct task_struct [noderef] __rcu *real_parent
kernel/fork.c:3087:43: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) @@ expected struct refcount_struct const [usertype] *r @@ got struct refcount_struct [noderef] __rcu * @@
kernel/fork.c:3087:43: sparse: expected struct refcount_struct const [usertype] *r
kernel/fork.c:3087:43: sparse: got struct refcount_struct [noderef] __rcu *
kernel/fork.c:2162:22: sparse: sparse: dereference of noderef expression
kernel/fork.c: note: in included file (through include/uapi/asm-generic/bpf_perf_event.h, arch/x86/include/generated/uapi/asm/bpf_perf_event.h, ...):
include/linux/ptrace.h:217:45: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 2 (different address spaces) @@ expected struct task_struct *new_parent @@ got struct task_struct [noderef] __rcu *parent @@
include/linux/ptrace.h:217:45: sparse: expected struct task_struct *new_parent
include/linux/ptrace.h:217:45: sparse: got struct task_struct [noderef] __rcu *parent
include/linux/ptrace.h:217:62: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 3 (different address spaces) @@ expected struct cred const *ptracer_cred @@ got struct cred const [noderef] __rcu *ptracer_cred @@
include/linux/ptrace.h:217:62: sparse: expected struct cred const *ptracer_cred
include/linux/ptrace.h:217:62: sparse: got struct cred const [noderef] __rcu *ptracer_cred
kernel/fork.c:2495:59: sparse: sparse: dereference of noderef expression
kernel/fork.c:2496:59: sparse: sparse: dereference of noderef expression
Please review and possibly fold the followup patch.
vim +/free_stack +1110 kernel/fork.c
a3d29e8291b622 Peter Zijlstra 2022-02-07 1100
d46eb14b735b11 Shakeel Butt 2018-08-17 1101 #ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG
d46eb14b735b11 Shakeel Butt 2018-08-17 1102 tsk->active_memcg = NULL;
d46eb14b735b11 Shakeel Butt 2018-08-17 1103 #endif
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 1104 return tsk;
61c4628b538608 Suresh Siddha 2008-03-10 1105
3e724f844e3fe4 Gang Li 2022-05-12 1106 free_rss_stat:
3e724f844e3fe4 Gang Li 2022-05-12 1107 #ifdef SPLIT_RSS_NUMA_COUNTING
3e724f844e3fe4 Gang Li 2022-05-12 1108 kfree(numa_count);
3e724f844e3fe4 Gang Li 2022-05-12 1109 #endif
b235beea9e996a Linus Torvalds 2016-06-24 @1110 free_stack:
1a03d3f13ffe5d Sebastian Andrzej Siewior 2022-02-17 1111 exit_task_stack_account(tsk);
ba14a194a434cc Andy Lutomirski 2016-08-11 1112 free_thread_stack(tsk);
f19b9f74b7ea3b Akinobu Mita 2012-07-30 1113 free_tsk:
61c4628b538608 Suresh Siddha 2008-03-10 1114 free_task_struct(tsk);
61c4628b538608 Suresh Siddha 2008-03-10 1115 return NULL;
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 1116 }
^1da177e4c3f41 Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 1117
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://01.org/lkp
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread* [RFC PATCH] mm: rss_stat_free() can be static
2022-05-12 21:21 [PATCH 2/5 v1] mm: add numa_count field for rss_stat kernel test robot
@ 2022-05-12 21:12 ` kernel test robot
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2022-05-12 21:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kbuild
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1760 bytes --]
CC: kbuild-all(a)lists.01.org
BCC: lkp(a)intel.com
In-Reply-To: <20220512044634.63586-3-ligang.bdlg@bytedance.com>
References: <20220512044634.63586-3-ligang.bdlg@bytedance.com>
TO: Gang Li <ligang.bdlg@bytedance.com>
TO: akpm(a)linux-foundation.org
CC: songmuchun(a)bytedance.com
CC: hca(a)linux.ibm.com
CC: gor(a)linux.ibm.com
CC: agordeev(a)linux.ibm.com
CC: borntraeger(a)linux.ibm.com
CC: svens(a)linux.ibm.com
CC: ebiederm(a)xmission.com
CC: keescook(a)chromium.org
CC: viro(a)zeniv.linux.org.uk
CC: rostedt(a)goodmis.org
CC: mingo(a)redhat.com
CC: peterz(a)infradead.org
CC: acme(a)kernel.org
CC: mark.rutland(a)arm.com
CC: alexander.shishkin(a)linux.intel.com
CC: jolsa(a)kernel.org
CC: namhyung(a)kernel.org
CC: david(a)redhat.com
CC: imbrenda(a)linux.ibm.com
CC: apopple(a)nvidia.com
CC: adobriyan(a)gmail.com
CC: stephen.s.brennan(a)oracle.com
CC: ohoono.kwon(a)samsung.com
CC: haolee.swjtu(a)gmail.com
CC: kaleshsingh(a)google.com
CC: zhengqi.arch(a)bytedance.com
CC: peterx(a)redhat.com
CC: shy828301(a)gmail.com
CC: surenb(a)google.com
kernel/fork.c:878:6: warning: symbol 'rss_stat_free' was not declared. Should it be static?
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
---
kernel/fork.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
index e549e0b30e2bd..2f5ce61f2aac8 100644
--- a/kernel/fork.c
+++ b/kernel/fork.c
@@ -875,7 +875,7 @@ void rss_stat_free(struct task_struct *p)
kfree(p->rss_stat.numa_count);
}
#else
-void rss_stat_free(struct task_struct *p) {}
+static void rss_stat_free(struct task_struct *p) {}
#endif
void __put_task_struct(struct task_struct *tsk)
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-05-12 21:21 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-05-12 21:21 [PATCH 2/5 v1] mm: add numa_count field for rss_stat kernel test robot
2022-05-12 21:12 ` [RFC PATCH] mm: rss_stat_free() can be static kernel test robot
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.