From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: Jose Ignacio Tornos Martinez <jtornosm@redhat.com>,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] USB: core: skip unconfiguration if device doesn't support it
Date: Fri, 13 May 2022 16:13:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yn5nc2mSHrdy/8h6@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Yn5mliJq+7W8khe9@rowland.harvard.edu>
On Fri, May 13, 2022 at 10:09:26AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Fri, May 13, 2022 at 11:50:26AM +0200, Jose Ignacio Tornos Martinez wrote:
> > Ok, I will try to identify the "bad" devices in some way.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > José Ignacio
> >
> >
> > On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 1:48 PM Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > I'll drop this for now as there are no in-kernel users for this quirk
> > > yet. When there is a need for one, please resubmit it.
>
> Hold on; Greg's comment doesn't seem fair. There are no in-kernel
> users for this quirk because it is meant to be a user API. (Just as
> there are no in-kernel users for read(2) -- it is there so that
> userspace can call it).
True, but the kernel calls read(2) itself as well in places, it just
looks a bit different, kernel_read_file() :)
> Jose does have users for the new quirk: Anybody with one of the bad
> Bluetooth CSR knockoff chips. Now I agree; it would be great if there
> was some way to identify them automatically. But if that's not
> possible, the only alternative is to allow userspace to set the quirk
> flag whenever it knows the quirk is needed.
Is that the case here that we know how to identify this? I thought
Marcel said something else was happening here.
If the bluetooth developers/maintainers say this is needed for some
devices to work properly and they will be handled in userspace somehow
through a udev rule or the like, I will gladly add this. But I thought
this thread died out as it was determined that this wasn't needed at
this point in time which is why I dropped it.
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-13 14:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-04 15:16 [PATCH v5] USB: core: skip unconfiguration if device doesn't support it Jose Ignacio Tornos Martinez
2022-05-04 17:54 ` Alan Stern
2022-05-12 11:47 ` Greg KH
2022-05-13 9:50 ` Jose Ignacio Tornos Martinez
2022-05-13 14:09 ` Alan Stern
2022-05-13 14:13 ` Greg KH [this message]
2022-05-13 14:26 ` Alan Stern
2022-05-13 14:46 ` Greg KH
2022-05-13 14:58 ` Jose Ignacio Tornos Martinez
2022-05-17 13:58 ` Jose Ignacio Tornos Martinez
2022-05-13 15:00 ` Bjørn Mork
2022-05-16 5:45 ` Jose Ignacio Tornos Martinez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Yn5nc2mSHrdy/8h6@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jtornosm@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcel@holtmann.org \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.