From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: Qin Jian <qinjian@cqplus1.com>
Cc: krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: arm: sunplus: Add bindings for Sunplus SP7021 SoC boards
Date: Thu, 5 May 2022 17:34:11 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YnRQ4ya2trphqQuo@robh.at.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220505064430.124657-1-qinjian@cqplus1.com>
On Thu, May 05, 2022 at 02:44:30PM +0800, Qin Jian wrote:
> This introduces bindings for boards based Sunplus SP7021 SoC.
>
> This patch is separated from the patch series:
> Add Sunplus SP7021 SoC Support. [1]
> To simply thing, I extract it from the original and resend this patch.
This information doesn't belong in the commit msg. You should put
context like this below the '---'.
Who suggested splitting this out? Normally, new SoC families series are
applied as a whole by the SoC maintainers (Arnd/Olof).
Rob
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: Qin Jian <qinjian@cqplus1.com>
Cc: krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: arm: sunplus: Add bindings for Sunplus SP7021 SoC boards
Date: Thu, 5 May 2022 17:34:11 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YnRQ4ya2trphqQuo@robh.at.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220505064430.124657-1-qinjian@cqplus1.com>
On Thu, May 05, 2022 at 02:44:30PM +0800, Qin Jian wrote:
> This introduces bindings for boards based Sunplus SP7021 SoC.
>
> This patch is separated from the patch series:
> Add Sunplus SP7021 SoC Support. [1]
> To simply thing, I extract it from the original and resend this patch.
This information doesn't belong in the commit msg. You should put
context like this below the '---'.
Who suggested splitting this out? Normally, new SoC families series are
applied as a whole by the SoC maintainers (Arnd/Olof).
Rob
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-05 22:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-05 6:44 [PATCH] dt-bindings: arm: sunplus: Add bindings for Sunplus SP7021 SoC boards Qin Jian
2022-05-05 6:44 ` Qin Jian
2022-05-05 22:34 ` Rob Herring [this message]
2022-05-05 22:34 ` Rob Herring
2022-05-06 2:10 ` qinjian[覃健]
2022-05-06 2:10 ` qinjian[覃健]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YnRQ4ya2trphqQuo@robh.at.kernel.org \
--to=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=qinjian@cqplus1.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.