From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
To: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org,
Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu <quic_srivasam@quicinc.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bard.liao@intel.com,
pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] soundwire: qcom: adjust autoenumeration timeout
Date: Mon, 9 May 2022 12:03:22 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yni1sr0R34C+bR6X@matsya> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220506084705.18525-1-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
On 06-05-22, 09:47, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
> Currently timeout for autoenumeration during probe and bus reset is set to
> 2 secs which is really a big value. This can have an adverse effect on
> boot time if the slave device is not ready/reset.
> This was the case with wcd938x which was not reset yet but we spent 2
> secs waiting in the soundwire controller probe. Reduce this time to
> 1/10 of Hz which should be good enough time to finish autoenumeration
> if any slaves are available on the bus.
Applied, thanks
--
~Vinod
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
To: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com, bard.liao@intel.com,
Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu <quic_srivasam@quicinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] soundwire: qcom: adjust autoenumeration timeout
Date: Mon, 9 May 2022 12:03:22 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yni1sr0R34C+bR6X@matsya> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220506084705.18525-1-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
On 06-05-22, 09:47, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
> Currently timeout for autoenumeration during probe and bus reset is set to
> 2 secs which is really a big value. This can have an adverse effect on
> boot time if the slave device is not ready/reset.
> This was the case with wcd938x which was not reset yet but we spent 2
> secs waiting in the soundwire controller probe. Reduce this time to
> 1/10 of Hz which should be good enough time to finish autoenumeration
> if any slaves are available on the bus.
Applied, thanks
--
~Vinod
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-09 6:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-06 8:47 [PATCH v2] soundwire: qcom: adjust autoenumeration timeout Srinivas Kandagatla
2022-05-06 8:47 ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2022-05-06 14:13 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2022-05-07 6:52 ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2022-05-09 13:31 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2022-05-09 14:08 ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2022-05-09 14:24 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2022-05-09 14:32 ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2022-05-09 14:36 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2022-05-09 14:42 ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2022-05-09 6:33 ` Vinod Koul [this message]
2022-05-09 6:33 ` Vinod Koul
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Yni1sr0R34C+bR6X@matsya \
--to=vkoul@kernel.org \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=bard.liao@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=quic_srivasam@quicinc.com \
--cc=srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.