All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>
To: Tyrone Ting <warp5tw@gmail.com>
Cc: avifishman70@gmail.com, tmaimon77@gmail.com,
	tali.perry1@gmail.com, venture@google.com, yuenn@google.com,
	benjaminfair@google.com, robh+dt@kernel.org,
	krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org,
	andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com,
	semen.protsenko@linaro.org, rafal@milecki.pl, sven@svenpeter.dev,
	jsd@semihalf.com, jie.deng@intel.com, lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com,
	arnd@arndb.de, olof@lixom.net, tali.perry@nuvoton.com,
	Avi.Fishman@nuvoton.com, tomer.maimon@nuvoton.com,
	KWLIU@nuvoton.com, JJLIU0@nuvoton.com, kfting@nuvoton.com,
	openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 08/10] i2c: npcm: Remove own slave addresses 2:10
Date: Sat, 21 May 2022 07:58:52 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yoh/nEYPu++LZSvb@shikoro> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220517101142.28421-9-warp5tw@gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2079 bytes --]


> NPCM can support up to 10 own slave addresses. In practice, only one
> address is actually being used. In order to access addresses 2 and above,
> need to switch register banks. The switch needs spinlock.
> To avoid using spinlock for this useless feature removed support of SA >=
> 2. Also fix returned slave event enum.

Is the spinlock contention so high? The code paths do not really look
like hot paths to me. A bit sad to see this feature go.

>  static const int npcm_i2caddr[I2C_NUM_OWN_ADDR] = {
>  	NPCM_I2CADDR1, NPCM_I2CADDR2, NPCM_I2CADDR3, NPCM_I2CADDR4,
>  	NPCM_I2CADDR5, NPCM_I2CADDR6, NPCM_I2CADDR7, NPCM_I2CADDR8,

Why do we keep this array if we drop the support?

> @@ -604,8 +602,7 @@ static int npcm_i2c_slave_enable(struct npcm_i2c *bus, enum i2c_addr addr_type,
>  			i2cctl1 &= ~NPCM_I2CCTL1_GCMEN;
>  		iowrite8(i2cctl1, bus->reg + NPCM_I2CCTL1);
>  		return 0;
> -	}
> -	if (addr_type == I2C_ARP_ADDR) {
> +	} else if (addr_type == I2C_ARP_ADDR) {

I might be wrong but this looks like a seperate change?

> @@ -924,11 +918,15 @@ static int npcm_i2c_slave_get_wr_buf(struct npcm_i2c *bus)
>  	for (i = 0; i < I2C_HW_FIFO_SIZE; i++) {
>  		if (bus->slv_wr_size >= I2C_HW_FIFO_SIZE)
>  			break;
> -		i2c_slave_event(bus->slave, I2C_SLAVE_READ_REQUESTED, &value);
> +		if (bus->state == I2C_SLAVE_MATCH) {
> +			i2c_slave_event(bus->slave, I2C_SLAVE_READ_REQUESTED, &value);
> +			bus->state = I2C_OPER_STARTED;
> +		} else {
> +			i2c_slave_event(bus->slave, I2C_SLAVE_READ_PROCESSED, &value);
> +		}
>  		ind = (bus->slv_wr_ind + bus->slv_wr_size) % I2C_HW_FIFO_SIZE;
>  		bus->slv_wr_buf[ind] = value;
>  		bus->slv_wr_size++;
> -		i2c_slave_event(bus->slave, I2C_SLAVE_READ_PROCESSED, &value);
>  	}
>  	return I2C_HW_FIFO_SIZE - ret;
>  }
> @@ -976,7 +974,6 @@ static void npcm_i2c_slave_xmit(struct npcm_i2c *bus, u16 nwrite,
>  	if (nwrite == 0)
>  		return;
>  
> -	bus->state = I2C_OPER_STARTED;
>  	bus->operation = I2C_WRITE_OPER;

This is definately a seperate change!

All the best!

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>
To: Tyrone Ting <warp5tw@gmail.com>
Cc: tmaimon77@gmail.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	tali.perry1@gmail.com, jsd@semihalf.com,
	krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, rafal@milecki.pl,
	benjaminfair@google.com, openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org,
	JJLIU0@nuvoton.com, lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com,
	tomer.maimon@nuvoton.com, KWLIU@nuvoton.com, arnd@arndb.de,
	sven@svenpeter.dev, robh+dt@kernel.org, Avi.Fishman@nuvoton.com,
	andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, semen.protsenko@linaro.org,
	jie.deng@intel.com, avifishman70@gmail.com, venture@google.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kfting@nuvoton.com,
	tali.perry@nuvoton.com, jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com,
	olof@lixom.net, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 08/10] i2c: npcm: Remove own slave addresses 2:10
Date: Sat, 21 May 2022 07:58:52 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yoh/nEYPu++LZSvb@shikoro> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220517101142.28421-9-warp5tw@gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2079 bytes --]


> NPCM can support up to 10 own slave addresses. In practice, only one
> address is actually being used. In order to access addresses 2 and above,
> need to switch register banks. The switch needs spinlock.
> To avoid using spinlock for this useless feature removed support of SA >=
> 2. Also fix returned slave event enum.

Is the spinlock contention so high? The code paths do not really look
like hot paths to me. A bit sad to see this feature go.

>  static const int npcm_i2caddr[I2C_NUM_OWN_ADDR] = {
>  	NPCM_I2CADDR1, NPCM_I2CADDR2, NPCM_I2CADDR3, NPCM_I2CADDR4,
>  	NPCM_I2CADDR5, NPCM_I2CADDR6, NPCM_I2CADDR7, NPCM_I2CADDR8,

Why do we keep this array if we drop the support?

> @@ -604,8 +602,7 @@ static int npcm_i2c_slave_enable(struct npcm_i2c *bus, enum i2c_addr addr_type,
>  			i2cctl1 &= ~NPCM_I2CCTL1_GCMEN;
>  		iowrite8(i2cctl1, bus->reg + NPCM_I2CCTL1);
>  		return 0;
> -	}
> -	if (addr_type == I2C_ARP_ADDR) {
> +	} else if (addr_type == I2C_ARP_ADDR) {

I might be wrong but this looks like a seperate change?

> @@ -924,11 +918,15 @@ static int npcm_i2c_slave_get_wr_buf(struct npcm_i2c *bus)
>  	for (i = 0; i < I2C_HW_FIFO_SIZE; i++) {
>  		if (bus->slv_wr_size >= I2C_HW_FIFO_SIZE)
>  			break;
> -		i2c_slave_event(bus->slave, I2C_SLAVE_READ_REQUESTED, &value);
> +		if (bus->state == I2C_SLAVE_MATCH) {
> +			i2c_slave_event(bus->slave, I2C_SLAVE_READ_REQUESTED, &value);
> +			bus->state = I2C_OPER_STARTED;
> +		} else {
> +			i2c_slave_event(bus->slave, I2C_SLAVE_READ_PROCESSED, &value);
> +		}
>  		ind = (bus->slv_wr_ind + bus->slv_wr_size) % I2C_HW_FIFO_SIZE;
>  		bus->slv_wr_buf[ind] = value;
>  		bus->slv_wr_size++;
> -		i2c_slave_event(bus->slave, I2C_SLAVE_READ_PROCESSED, &value);
>  	}
>  	return I2C_HW_FIFO_SIZE - ret;
>  }
> @@ -976,7 +974,6 @@ static void npcm_i2c_slave_xmit(struct npcm_i2c *bus, u16 nwrite,
>  	if (nwrite == 0)
>  		return;
>  
> -	bus->state = I2C_OPER_STARTED;
>  	bus->operation = I2C_WRITE_OPER;

This is definately a seperate change!

All the best!

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2022-05-21  5:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-17 10:11 [PATCH v5 00/10] i2c: npcm: Bug fixes timeout, spurious interrupts Tyrone Ting
2022-05-17 10:11 ` Tyrone Ting
2022-05-17 10:11 ` [PATCH v5 01/10] dt-bindings: i2c: npcm: support NPCM845 Tyrone Ting
2022-05-17 10:11   ` Tyrone Ting
2022-05-21  6:03   ` Wolfram Sang
2022-05-21  6:03     ` Wolfram Sang
2022-05-21 12:30     ` Tyrone Ting
2022-05-17 10:11 ` [PATCH v5 02/10] i2c: npcm: Change the way of getting GCR regmap Tyrone Ting
2022-05-17 10:11   ` Tyrone Ting
2022-05-21  5:51   ` Wolfram Sang
2022-05-21  5:51     ` Wolfram Sang
2022-05-21 12:36     ` Tyrone Ting
2022-05-17 10:11 ` [PATCH v5 03/10] i2c: npcm: Remove unused variable clk_regmap Tyrone Ting
2022-05-17 10:11   ` Tyrone Ting
2022-05-21  5:51   ` Wolfram Sang
2022-05-21  5:51     ` Wolfram Sang
2022-05-21 12:53     ` Tyrone Ting
2022-05-17 10:11 ` [PATCH v5 04/10] i2c: npcm: Fix timeout calculation Tyrone Ting
2022-05-17 10:11   ` Tyrone Ting
2022-05-21  5:52   ` Wolfram Sang
2022-05-21  5:52     ` Wolfram Sang
2022-05-21 12:55     ` Tyrone Ting
2022-05-17 10:11 ` [PATCH v5 05/10] i2c: npcm: Add tx complete counter Tyrone Ting
2022-05-17 10:11   ` Tyrone Ting
2022-05-21  5:52   ` Wolfram Sang
2022-05-21  5:52     ` Wolfram Sang
2022-05-21 12:57     ` Tyrone Ting
2022-05-17 10:11 ` [PATCH v5 06/10] i2c: npcm: Correct register access width Tyrone Ting
2022-05-17 10:11   ` Tyrone Ting
2022-05-21  5:53   ` Wolfram Sang
2022-05-21  5:53     ` Wolfram Sang
2022-05-21 12:58     ` Tyrone Ting
2022-05-17 10:11 ` [PATCH v5 07/10] i2c: npcm: Handle spurious interrupts Tyrone Ting
2022-05-17 10:11   ` Tyrone Ting
2022-05-21  5:53   ` Wolfram Sang
2022-05-21  5:53     ` Wolfram Sang
2022-05-21 13:00     ` Tyrone Ting
2022-05-17 10:11 ` [PATCH v5 08/10] i2c: npcm: Remove own slave addresses 2:10 Tyrone Ting
2022-05-17 10:11   ` Tyrone Ting
2022-05-21  5:58   ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2022-05-21  5:58     ` Wolfram Sang
2022-05-22  6:56     ` Tali Perry
2022-05-22 20:09       ` Wolfram Sang
2022-05-22 20:09         ` Wolfram Sang
2022-05-17 10:11 ` [PATCH v5 09/10] i2c: npcm: Support NPCM845 Tyrone Ting
2022-05-17 10:11   ` Tyrone Ting
2022-05-21  6:00   ` Wolfram Sang
2022-05-21  6:00     ` Wolfram Sang
2022-05-21 13:10     ` Tyrone Ting
2022-05-22 21:21       ` Tomer Maimon
2022-05-17 10:11 ` [PATCH v5 10/10] i2c: npcm: Capitalize the one-line comment Tyrone Ting
2022-05-17 10:11   ` Tyrone Ting
2022-05-21  6:03   ` Wolfram Sang
2022-05-21  6:03     ` Wolfram Sang
2022-05-21 13:22     ` Tyrone Ting

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Yoh/nEYPu++LZSvb@shikoro \
    --to=wsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=Avi.Fishman@nuvoton.com \
    --cc=JJLIU0@nuvoton.com \
    --cc=KWLIU@nuvoton.com \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=avifishman70@gmail.com \
    --cc=benjaminfair@google.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jie.deng@intel.com \
    --cc=jsd@semihalf.com \
    --cc=kfting@nuvoton.com \
    --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com \
    --cc=olof@lixom.net \
    --cc=openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=rafal@milecki.pl \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=semen.protsenko@linaro.org \
    --cc=sven@svenpeter.dev \
    --cc=tali.perry1@gmail.com \
    --cc=tali.perry@nuvoton.com \
    --cc=tmaimon77@gmail.com \
    --cc=tomer.maimon@nuvoton.com \
    --cc=venture@google.com \
    --cc=warp5tw@gmail.com \
    --cc=yuenn@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.