From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
To: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] f2fs: add sysfs entry to avoid FUA
Date: Fri, 27 May 2022 18:06:08 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YpF1gPrQY3UFsgwC@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YpFDw3mQjN1LBd2j@gmail.com>
On 05/27, Eric Biggers wrote:
> [+Cc linux-block for FUA, and linux-xfs for iomap]
>
> On Fri, May 27, 2022 at 01:59:55PM -0700, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > Some UFS storage gives slower performance on FUA than write+cache_flush.
> > Let's give a way to manage it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
>
> Should the driver even be saying that it has FUA support in this case? If the
> driver didn't claim FUA support, that would also solve this problem.
I think there's still some benefit to use FUA such as small chunk writes
for checkpoint.
>
> > ---
> > Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-fs-f2fs | 7 +++++++
> > fs/f2fs/data.c | 2 ++
> > fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 1 +
> > fs/f2fs/sysfs.c | 2 ++
> > 4 files changed, 12 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-fs-f2fs b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-fs-f2fs
> > index 9b583dd0298b..cd96b09d7182 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-fs-f2fs
> > +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-fs-f2fs
> > @@ -434,6 +434,7 @@ Date: April 2020
> > Contact: "Daeho Jeong" <daehojeong@google.com>
> > Description: Give a way to change iostat_period time. 3secs by default.
> > The new iostat trace gives stats gap given the period.
> > +
> > What: /sys/fs/f2fs/<disk>/max_io_bytes
> > Date: December 2020
> > Contact: "Jaegeuk Kim" <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
> > @@ -442,6 +443,12 @@ Description: This gives a control to limit the bio size in f2fs.
> > whereas, if it has a certain bytes value, f2fs won't submit a
> > bio larger than that size.
> >
> > +What: /sys/fs/f2fs/<disk>/no_fua_dio
> > +Date: May 2022
> > +Contact: "Jaegeuk Kim" <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
> > +Description: This gives a signal to iomap, which should not use FUA for
> > + direct IOs. Default: 0.
>
> iomap is an implementation detail, so it shouldn't be mentioned in UAPI
> documentation. UAPI documentation should describe user-visible behavior only.
Ok.
>
> > +
> > What: /sys/fs/f2fs/<disk>/stat/sb_status
> > Date: December 2020
> > Contact: "Chao Yu" <yuchao0@huawei.com>
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> > index f5f2b7233982..23486486eab2 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/data.c
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> > @@ -4153,6 +4153,8 @@ static int f2fs_iomap_begin(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, loff_t length,
> > if ((inode->i_state & I_DIRTY_DATASYNC) ||
> > offset + length > i_size_read(inode))
> > iomap->flags |= IOMAP_F_DIRTY;
> > + if (F2FS_I_SB(inode)->no_fua_dio)
> > + iomap->flags |= IOMAP_F_DIRTY;
>
> This is overloading the IOMAP_F_DIRTY flag to mean something other than dirty.
> Perhaps this flag needs to be renamed, or a new flag should be added?
I'm not sure it's acceptable to add another flag for f2fs only.
>
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> > index e10838879538..c2400ea0080b 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> > @@ -1671,6 +1671,7 @@ struct f2fs_sb_info {
> > int dir_level; /* directory level */
> > int readdir_ra; /* readahead inode in readdir */
> > u64 max_io_bytes; /* max io bytes to merge IOs */
> > + int no_fua_dio; /* avoid FUA in DIO */
>
> Make this a bool?
Done.
>
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/sysfs.c b/fs/f2fs/sysfs.c
> > index 4c50aedd5144..24d628ca92cc 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/sysfs.c
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/sysfs.c
> > @@ -771,6 +771,7 @@ F2FS_RW_ATTR(F2FS_SBI, f2fs_sb_info, iostat_period_ms, iostat_period_ms);
> > #endif
> > F2FS_RW_ATTR(F2FS_SBI, f2fs_sb_info, readdir_ra, readdir_ra);
> > F2FS_RW_ATTR(F2FS_SBI, f2fs_sb_info, max_io_bytes, max_io_bytes);
> > +F2FS_RW_ATTR(F2FS_SBI, f2fs_sb_info, no_fua_dio, no_fua_dio);
> > F2FS_RW_ATTR(F2FS_SBI, f2fs_sb_info, gc_pin_file_thresh, gc_pin_file_threshold);
> > F2FS_RW_ATTR(F2FS_SBI, f2fs_super_block, extension_list, extension_list);
> > #ifdef CONFIG_F2FS_FAULT_INJECTION
> > @@ -890,6 +891,7 @@ static struct attribute *f2fs_attrs[] = {
> > #endif
> > ATTR_LIST(readdir_ra),
> > ATTR_LIST(max_io_bytes),
> > + ATTR_LIST(no_fua_dio),
>
> Where is it validated that only valid values (0 or 1) can be written to this
> file?
Added.
>
> - Eric
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
To: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: add sysfs entry to avoid FUA
Date: Fri, 27 May 2022 18:06:08 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YpF1gPrQY3UFsgwC@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YpFDw3mQjN1LBd2j@gmail.com>
On 05/27, Eric Biggers wrote:
> [+Cc linux-block for FUA, and linux-xfs for iomap]
>
> On Fri, May 27, 2022 at 01:59:55PM -0700, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > Some UFS storage gives slower performance on FUA than write+cache_flush.
> > Let's give a way to manage it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
>
> Should the driver even be saying that it has FUA support in this case? If the
> driver didn't claim FUA support, that would also solve this problem.
I think there's still some benefit to use FUA such as small chunk writes
for checkpoint.
>
> > ---
> > Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-fs-f2fs | 7 +++++++
> > fs/f2fs/data.c | 2 ++
> > fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 1 +
> > fs/f2fs/sysfs.c | 2 ++
> > 4 files changed, 12 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-fs-f2fs b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-fs-f2fs
> > index 9b583dd0298b..cd96b09d7182 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-fs-f2fs
> > +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-fs-f2fs
> > @@ -434,6 +434,7 @@ Date: April 2020
> > Contact: "Daeho Jeong" <daehojeong@google.com>
> > Description: Give a way to change iostat_period time. 3secs by default.
> > The new iostat trace gives stats gap given the period.
> > +
> > What: /sys/fs/f2fs/<disk>/max_io_bytes
> > Date: December 2020
> > Contact: "Jaegeuk Kim" <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
> > @@ -442,6 +443,12 @@ Description: This gives a control to limit the bio size in f2fs.
> > whereas, if it has a certain bytes value, f2fs won't submit a
> > bio larger than that size.
> >
> > +What: /sys/fs/f2fs/<disk>/no_fua_dio
> > +Date: May 2022
> > +Contact: "Jaegeuk Kim" <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
> > +Description: This gives a signal to iomap, which should not use FUA for
> > + direct IOs. Default: 0.
>
> iomap is an implementation detail, so it shouldn't be mentioned in UAPI
> documentation. UAPI documentation should describe user-visible behavior only.
Ok.
>
> > +
> > What: /sys/fs/f2fs/<disk>/stat/sb_status
> > Date: December 2020
> > Contact: "Chao Yu" <yuchao0@huawei.com>
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> > index f5f2b7233982..23486486eab2 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/data.c
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> > @@ -4153,6 +4153,8 @@ static int f2fs_iomap_begin(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, loff_t length,
> > if ((inode->i_state & I_DIRTY_DATASYNC) ||
> > offset + length > i_size_read(inode))
> > iomap->flags |= IOMAP_F_DIRTY;
> > + if (F2FS_I_SB(inode)->no_fua_dio)
> > + iomap->flags |= IOMAP_F_DIRTY;
>
> This is overloading the IOMAP_F_DIRTY flag to mean something other than dirty.
> Perhaps this flag needs to be renamed, or a new flag should be added?
I'm not sure it's acceptable to add another flag for f2fs only.
>
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> > index e10838879538..c2400ea0080b 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> > @@ -1671,6 +1671,7 @@ struct f2fs_sb_info {
> > int dir_level; /* directory level */
> > int readdir_ra; /* readahead inode in readdir */
> > u64 max_io_bytes; /* max io bytes to merge IOs */
> > + int no_fua_dio; /* avoid FUA in DIO */
>
> Make this a bool?
Done.
>
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/sysfs.c b/fs/f2fs/sysfs.c
> > index 4c50aedd5144..24d628ca92cc 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/sysfs.c
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/sysfs.c
> > @@ -771,6 +771,7 @@ F2FS_RW_ATTR(F2FS_SBI, f2fs_sb_info, iostat_period_ms, iostat_period_ms);
> > #endif
> > F2FS_RW_ATTR(F2FS_SBI, f2fs_sb_info, readdir_ra, readdir_ra);
> > F2FS_RW_ATTR(F2FS_SBI, f2fs_sb_info, max_io_bytes, max_io_bytes);
> > +F2FS_RW_ATTR(F2FS_SBI, f2fs_sb_info, no_fua_dio, no_fua_dio);
> > F2FS_RW_ATTR(F2FS_SBI, f2fs_sb_info, gc_pin_file_thresh, gc_pin_file_threshold);
> > F2FS_RW_ATTR(F2FS_SBI, f2fs_super_block, extension_list, extension_list);
> > #ifdef CONFIG_F2FS_FAULT_INJECTION
> > @@ -890,6 +891,7 @@ static struct attribute *f2fs_attrs[] = {
> > #endif
> > ATTR_LIST(readdir_ra),
> > ATTR_LIST(max_io_bytes),
> > + ATTR_LIST(no_fua_dio),
>
> Where is it validated that only valid values (0 or 1) can be written to this
> file?
Added.
>
> - Eric
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-28 1:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-27 20:59 [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: add sysfs entry to avoid FUA Jaegeuk Kim
2022-05-27 20:59 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2022-05-27 21:33 ` Eric Biggers
2022-05-27 21:33 ` [f2fs-dev] " Eric Biggers
2022-05-27 23:55 ` Dave Chinner
2022-05-27 23:55 ` [f2fs-dev] " Dave Chinner
2022-05-28 0:26 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2022-05-28 0:26 ` [f2fs-dev] " Jaegeuk Kim
2022-05-28 5:12 ` Dave Chinner
2022-05-28 5:12 ` [f2fs-dev] " Dave Chinner
2022-05-28 1:06 ` Jaegeuk Kim [this message]
2022-05-28 1:06 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2022-05-28 1:42 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-28 1:42 ` [f2fs-dev] " Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-28 5:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-05-28 5:03 ` [f2fs-dev] " Christoph Hellwig
2022-05-31 20:15 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2022-05-31 20:15 ` [f2fs-dev] " Jaegeuk Kim
2022-05-28 1:07 ` [f2fs-dev] [RFC PATCH v2] " Jaegeuk Kim
2022-05-28 1:07 ` Jaegeuk Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YpF1gPrQY3UFsgwC@google.com \
--to=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.