From: Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com>
To: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org>,
Jonas Bonn <jonas@southpole.se>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
x86@kernel.org, openrisc@lists.librecores.org,
linux-csky@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] openrisc/mm: Enable ARCH_HAS_VM_GET_PAGE_PROT
Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2022 15:07:12 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YpxIENWD3gOkFiG2@antec> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220603101411.488970-7-anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
On Fri, Jun 03, 2022 at 03:44:11PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> This defines and exports a platform specific custom vm_get_page_prot() via
> subscribing ARCH_HAS_VM_GET_PAGE_PROT. Subsequently all __SXXX and __PXXX
> macros can be dropped which are no longer needed.
>
> Cc: Jonas Bonn <jonas@southpole.se>
> Cc: openrisc@lists.librecores.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Acked-by: Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Is it possible to retract my Acked-by? I was following the discussion of this
new function actually being sub optimal. So as far as I am concerned all these
architecture patches should be nak'ed.
-Stafford
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com>
To: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Jonas Bonn <jonas@southpole.se>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-csky@vger.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
openrisc@lists.librecores.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>,
linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] openrisc/mm: Enable ARCH_HAS_VM_GET_PAGE_PROT
Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2022 15:07:12 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YpxIENWD3gOkFiG2@antec> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220603101411.488970-7-anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
On Fri, Jun 03, 2022 at 03:44:11PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> This defines and exports a platform specific custom vm_get_page_prot() via
> subscribing ARCH_HAS_VM_GET_PAGE_PROT. Subsequently all __SXXX and __PXXX
> macros can be dropped which are no longer needed.
>
> Cc: Jonas Bonn <jonas@southpole.se>
> Cc: openrisc@lists.librecores.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Acked-by: Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Is it possible to retract my Acked-by? I was following the discussion of this
new function actually being sub optimal. So as far as I am concerned all these
architecture patches should be nak'ed.
-Stafford
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com>
To: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Jonas Bonn <jonas@southpole.se>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
linux-csky@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
openrisc@lists.librecores.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>,
linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] openrisc/mm: Enable ARCH_HAS_VM_GET_PAGE_PROT
Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2022 15:07:12 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YpxIENWD3gOkFiG2@antec> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220603101411.488970-7-anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
On Fri, Jun 03, 2022 at 03:44:11PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> This defines and exports a platform specific custom vm_get_page_prot() via
> subscribing ARCH_HAS_VM_GET_PAGE_PROT. Subsequently all __SXXX and __PXXX
> macros can be dropped which are no longer needed.
>
> Cc: Jonas Bonn <jonas@southpole.se>
> Cc: openrisc@lists.librecores.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Acked-by: Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Is it possible to retract my Acked-by? I was following the discussion of this
new function actually being sub optimal. So as far as I am concerned all these
architecture patches should be nak'ed.
-Stafford
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com>
To: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org>,
Jonas Bonn <jonas@southpole.se>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
x86@kernel.org, openrisc@lists.librecores.org,
linux-csky@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] openrisc/mm: Enable ARCH_HAS_VM_GET_PAGE_PROT
Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2022 15:07:12 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YpxIENWD3gOkFiG2@antec> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220603101411.488970-7-anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
On Fri, Jun 03, 2022 at 03:44:11PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> This defines and exports a platform specific custom vm_get_page_prot() via
> subscribing ARCH_HAS_VM_GET_PAGE_PROT. Subsequently all __SXXX and __PXXX
> macros can be dropped which are no longer needed.
>
> Cc: Jonas Bonn <jonas@southpole.se>
> Cc: openrisc@lists.librecores.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Acked-by: Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Is it possible to retract my Acked-by? I was following the discussion of this
new function actually being sub optimal. So as far as I am concerned all these
architecture patches should be nak'ed.
-Stafford
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-05 6:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-03 10:14 [PATCH 0/6] mm/mmap: Enable more platforms with ARCH_HAS_VM_GET_PAGE_PROT Anshuman Khandual
2022-06-03 10:14 ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-06-03 10:14 ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-06-03 10:14 ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-06-03 10:14 ` [PATCH 1/6] mm/mmap: Restrict generic protection_map[] array visibility Anshuman Khandual
2022-06-03 10:14 ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-06-03 10:14 ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-06-03 10:14 ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-06-03 12:18 ` Christophe Leroy
2022-06-03 12:18 ` Christophe Leroy
2022-06-03 12:18 ` Christophe Leroy
2022-06-03 12:18 ` Christophe Leroy
2022-06-05 10:19 ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-06-05 10:19 ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-06-05 10:19 ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-06-05 10:19 ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-06-03 10:14 ` [PATCH 2/6] s390/mm: Enable ARCH_HAS_VM_GET_PAGE_PROT Anshuman Khandual
2022-06-03 10:14 ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-06-03 10:14 ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-06-03 10:14 ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-06-03 12:25 ` Christophe Leroy
2022-06-03 12:25 ` Christophe Leroy
2022-06-03 12:25 ` Christophe Leroy
2022-06-03 12:25 ` Christophe Leroy
2022-06-05 9:58 ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-06-05 9:58 ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-06-05 9:58 ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-06-05 9:58 ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-06-03 10:14 ` [PATCH 3/6] mips/mm: " Anshuman Khandual
2022-06-03 10:14 ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-06-03 10:14 ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-06-03 10:14 ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-06-03 10:14 ` [PATCH 4/6] csky/mm: " Anshuman Khandual
2022-06-03 10:14 ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-06-03 10:14 ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-06-03 10:14 ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-06-04 12:13 ` Guo Ren
2022-06-04 12:13 ` Guo Ren
2022-06-04 12:13 ` Guo Ren
2022-06-04 12:13 ` Guo Ren
2022-06-05 9:50 ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-06-05 9:50 ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-06-05 9:50 ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-06-05 9:50 ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-06-03 10:14 ` [PATCH 5/6] nios2/mm: " Anshuman Khandual
2022-06-03 10:14 ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-06-03 10:14 ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-06-03 10:14 ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-06-03 10:14 ` [PATCH 6/6] openrisc/mm: " Anshuman Khandual
2022-06-03 10:14 ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-06-03 10:14 ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-06-03 10:14 ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-06-05 6:07 ` Stafford Horne [this message]
2022-06-05 6:07 ` Stafford Horne
2022-06-05 6:07 ` Stafford Horne
2022-06-05 6:07 ` Stafford Horne
2022-06-05 9:48 ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-06-05 9:48 ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-06-05 9:48 ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-06-05 9:48 ` Anshuman Khandual
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YpxIENWD3gOkFiG2@antec \
--to=shorne@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dinguyen@kernel.org \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jonas@southpole.se \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-csky@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=openrisc@lists.librecores.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tsbogend@alpha.franken.de \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.