All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
To: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 2/3] f2fs: run GCs synchronously given user requests
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2022 15:34:49 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yq+kiXPyBsXgdYb2@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c45a9c8b-c73a-76bc-6725-5d7e48e7a3f2@kernel.org>

On 06/19, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2022/6/18 6:31, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > When users set GC_URGENT or GC_MID, they expected to do GCs right away.
> > But, there's a condition to bypass it. Let's indicate we need to do now
> > in the thread.
> 
> .should_migrate_blocks is used to force migrating blocks in full
> section, so what is the condition here? GC should not never select
> a full section, right?

I think it'll move a full section given .victim_segno is not NULL_SEGNO,
as __get_victim will give a dirty segment all the time. wdyt?

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
> > ---
> >   fs/f2fs/gc.c | 8 ++++++--
> >   1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/gc.c b/fs/f2fs/gc.c
> > index d5fb426e0747..f4aa3c88118b 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/gc.c
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/gc.c
> > @@ -37,7 +37,6 @@ static int gc_thread_func(void *data)
> >   	unsigned int wait_ms;
> >   	struct f2fs_gc_control gc_control = {
> >   		.victim_segno = NULL_SEGNO,
> > -		.should_migrate_blocks = false,
> >   		.err_gc_skipped = false };
> >   	wait_ms = gc_th->min_sleep_time;
> > @@ -113,7 +112,10 @@ static int gc_thread_func(void *data)
> >   				sbi->gc_mode == GC_URGENT_MID) {
> >   			wait_ms = gc_th->urgent_sleep_time;
> >   			f2fs_down_write(&sbi->gc_lock);
> > +			gc_control.should_migrate_blocks = true;
> >   			goto do_gc;
> > +		} else {
> > +			gc_control.should_migrate_blocks = false;
> >   		}
> >   		if (foreground) {
> > @@ -139,7 +141,9 @@ static int gc_thread_func(void *data)
> >   		if (!foreground)
> >   			stat_inc_bggc_count(sbi->stat_info);
> > -		sync_mode = F2FS_OPTION(sbi).bggc_mode == BGGC_MODE_SYNC;
> > +		sync_mode = F2FS_OPTION(sbi).bggc_mode == BGGC_MODE_SYNC ||
> > +				sbi->gc_mode == GC_URGENT_HIGH ||
> > +				sbi->gc_mode == GC_URGENT_MID;
> >   		/* foreground GC was been triggered via f2fs_balance_fs() */
> >   		if (foreground)


_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
To: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 2/3] f2fs: run GCs synchronously given user requests
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2022 15:34:49 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yq+kiXPyBsXgdYb2@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c45a9c8b-c73a-76bc-6725-5d7e48e7a3f2@kernel.org>

On 06/19, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2022/6/18 6:31, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > When users set GC_URGENT or GC_MID, they expected to do GCs right away.
> > But, there's a condition to bypass it. Let's indicate we need to do now
> > in the thread.
> 
> .should_migrate_blocks is used to force migrating blocks in full
> section, so what is the condition here? GC should not never select
> a full section, right?

I think it'll move a full section given .victim_segno is not NULL_SEGNO,
as __get_victim will give a dirty segment all the time. wdyt?

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
> > ---
> >   fs/f2fs/gc.c | 8 ++++++--
> >   1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/gc.c b/fs/f2fs/gc.c
> > index d5fb426e0747..f4aa3c88118b 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/gc.c
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/gc.c
> > @@ -37,7 +37,6 @@ static int gc_thread_func(void *data)
> >   	unsigned int wait_ms;
> >   	struct f2fs_gc_control gc_control = {
> >   		.victim_segno = NULL_SEGNO,
> > -		.should_migrate_blocks = false,
> >   		.err_gc_skipped = false };
> >   	wait_ms = gc_th->min_sleep_time;
> > @@ -113,7 +112,10 @@ static int gc_thread_func(void *data)
> >   				sbi->gc_mode == GC_URGENT_MID) {
> >   			wait_ms = gc_th->urgent_sleep_time;
> >   			f2fs_down_write(&sbi->gc_lock);
> > +			gc_control.should_migrate_blocks = true;
> >   			goto do_gc;
> > +		} else {
> > +			gc_control.should_migrate_blocks = false;
> >   		}
> >   		if (foreground) {
> > @@ -139,7 +141,9 @@ static int gc_thread_func(void *data)
> >   		if (!foreground)
> >   			stat_inc_bggc_count(sbi->stat_info);
> > -		sync_mode = F2FS_OPTION(sbi).bggc_mode == BGGC_MODE_SYNC;
> > +		sync_mode = F2FS_OPTION(sbi).bggc_mode == BGGC_MODE_SYNC ||
> > +				sbi->gc_mode == GC_URGENT_HIGH ||
> > +				sbi->gc_mode == GC_URGENT_MID;
> >   		/* foreground GC was been triggered via f2fs_balance_fs() */
> >   		if (foreground)

  reply	other threads:[~2022-06-19 22:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-17 22:31 [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 1/3] f2fs: attach inline_data after setting compression Jaegeuk Kim
2022-06-17 22:31 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2022-06-17 22:31 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 2/3] f2fs: run GCs synchronously given user requests Jaegeuk Kim
2022-06-17 22:31   ` Jaegeuk Kim
2022-06-19  0:41   ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2022-06-19  0:41     ` Chao Yu
2022-06-19 22:34     ` Jaegeuk Kim [this message]
2022-06-19 22:34       ` Jaegeuk Kim
2022-06-22 14:02       ` Chao Yu
2022-06-22 14:02         ` Chao Yu
2022-06-22 16:58         ` Jaegeuk Kim
2022-06-22 16:58           ` Jaegeuk Kim
2022-06-28  7:59           ` Chao Yu
2022-06-28  7:59             ` Chao Yu
2022-06-28 18:17             ` Jaegeuk Kim
2022-06-28 18:17               ` Jaegeuk Kim
2022-06-29 16:30               ` Jaegeuk Kim
2022-06-29 16:30                 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2022-06-17 22:31 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 3/3] f2fs: do not skip updating inode when retrying to flush node page Jaegeuk Kim
2022-06-17 22:31   ` Jaegeuk Kim
2022-06-19  0:54   ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2022-06-19  0:54     ` Chao Yu
2022-06-19  0:35 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 1/3] f2fs: attach inline_data after setting compression Chao Yu
2022-06-19  0:35   ` Chao Yu
2022-06-22 14:06   ` Chao Yu
2022-06-22 14:06     ` Chao Yu
2022-06-22 16:52     ` Jaegeuk Kim
2022-06-22 16:52       ` Jaegeuk Kim
2022-06-22 16:53 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 1/3 v2] " Jaegeuk Kim
2022-06-22 16:53   ` Jaegeuk Kim
2022-06-28  7:46   ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2022-06-28  7:46     ` Chao Yu
2022-06-28  7:50     ` Chao Yu
2022-06-28  7:50       ` Chao Yu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Yq+kiXPyBsXgdYb2@google.com \
    --to=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=chao@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.