Re: [PATCH v5 2/6] mm: ioremap: Use more sensibly name in ioremap_prot()

From: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
To: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Cc: catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	hch@infradead.org, arnd@arndb.de, anshuman.khandual@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/6] mm: ioremap: Use more sensibly name in ioremap_prot()
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2022 15:22:53 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YqBOTfGo7uH+48UM@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YqAir8uTUziObhHn@MiWiFi-R3L-srv>

On 06/08/22 at 12:16pm, Baoquan He wrote:
> On 06/07/22 at 08:50pm, Kefeng Wang wrote:
> > Use more meaningful and sensibly naming phys_addr
> > instead addr in ioremap_prot().
> > 
> > Suggested-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
> > ---
> >  include/asm-generic/io.h |  3 ++-
> >  mm/ioremap.c             | 14 ++++++++------
> >  2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/include/asm-generic/io.h b/include/asm-generic/io.h
> > index 7ce93aaf69f8..b76379628a02 100644
> > --- a/include/asm-generic/io.h
> > +++ b/include/asm-generic/io.h
> > @@ -964,7 +964,8 @@ static inline void iounmap(volatile void __iomem *addr)
> >  #elif defined(CONFIG_GENERIC_IOREMAP)
> >  #include <linux/pgtable.h>
> >  
> > -void __iomem *ioremap_prot(phys_addr_t addr, size_t size, unsigned long prot);
> > +void __iomem *ioremap_prot(phys_addr_t phys_addr, size_t size,
> > +			   unsigned long prot);
> >  void iounmap(volatile void __iomem *addr);
> >  
> >  static inline void __iomem *ioremap(phys_addr_t addr, size_t size)
> > diff --git a/mm/ioremap.c b/mm/ioremap.c
> > index 5fe598ecd9b7..2d754b48d230 100644
> > --- a/mm/ioremap.c
> > +++ b/mm/ioremap.c
> > @@ -11,20 +11,21 @@
> >  #include <linux/io.h>
> >  #include <linux/export.h>
> >  
> > -void __iomem *ioremap_prot(phys_addr_t addr, size_t size, unsigned long prot)
> > +void __iomem *ioremap_prot(phys_addr_t phys_addr, size_t size,
> > +			   unsigned long prot)
> >  {
> >  	unsigned long offset, vaddr;
> >  	phys_addr_t last_addr;
> >  	struct vm_struct *area;
> >  
> >  	/* Disallow wrap-around or zero size */
> > -	last_addr = addr + size - 1;
> > -	if (!size || last_addr < addr)
> > +	last_addr = phys_addr + size - 1;
> > +	if (!size || last_addr < phys_addr)
> >  		return NULL;
> >  
> >  	/* Page-align mappings */
> > -	offset = addr & (~PAGE_MASK);
> > -	addr -= offset;
> > +	offset = phys_addr & (~PAGE_MASK);
>                  ~~~ use offset_in_page() instead?

Sorry, this patch only does s/addr/phys_addr/, please ignore this comment.

> 
> Other than this nitpick, this looks good to me.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
> 
> > +	phys_addr -= offset;
> >  	size = PAGE_ALIGN(size + offset);
> >  
> >  	area = get_vm_area_caller(size, VM_IOREMAP,
> > @@ -33,7 +34,8 @@ void __iomem *ioremap_prot(phys_addr_t addr, size_t size, unsigned long prot)
> >  		return NULL;
> >  	vaddr = (unsigned long)area->addr;
> >  
> > -	if (ioremap_page_range(vaddr, vaddr + size, addr, __pgprot(prot))) {
> > +	if (ioremap_page_range(vaddr, vaddr + size, phys_addr,
> > +			       __pgprot(prot))) {
> >  		free_vm_area(area);
> >  		return NULL;
> >  	}
> > -- 
> > 2.35.3
> > 
> > 
> 

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel