From: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
To: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com>
Cc: wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
elver@google.com, vincenzo.frascino@arm.com, will@kernel.org,
android-mm@google.com, maz@kernel.org,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, madvenka@linux.microsoft.com,
kernel-team@android.com, drjones@redhat.com, ast@kernel.org,
broonie@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
andreyknvl@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
mhiramat@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 16/17] KVM: arm64: Introduce pkvm_dump_backtrace()
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2022 12:16:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YtqHDTpnn376Qb7u@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220721055728.718573-17-kaleshsingh@google.com>
Hi Kalesh,
On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 10:57:27PM -0700, Kalesh Singh wrote:
[...]
> +/*
> + * pkvm_dump_backtrace - Dump the protected nVHE HYP backtrace.
> + *
> + * @hyp_offset: hypervisor offset, used for address translation.
> + *
> + * Dumping of the pKVM HYP backtrace is done by reading the
> + * stack addresses from the shared stacktrace buffer, since the
> + * host cannot direclty access hyperviosr memory in protected
> + * mode.
> + */
> +static void pkvm_dump_backtrace(unsigned long hyp_offset)
> +{
> + unsigned long *stacktrace_entry
> + = (unsigned long *)this_cpu_ptr_nvhe_sym(pkvm_stacktrace);
> + unsigned long va_mask, pc;
> +
> + va_mask = GENMASK_ULL(vabits_actual - 1, 0);
> +
> + kvm_err("Protected nVHE HYP call trace:\n");
This and the footer printks should be put in respective helpers to share
between pKVM and non-pKVM backtrace implementations. I imagine users
will invariably bake some pattern matching to scrape traces, and it
should be consistent between both flavors.
> + /* The stack trace is terminated by a null entry */
> + for (; *stacktrace_entry; stacktrace_entry++) {
At the point we're dumping the backtrace we know that EL2 has already
soiled itself, so we shouldn't explicitly depend on it providing NULL
terminators. I believe this loop should have an explicit range && NULL
check.
--
Thanks,
Oliver
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
To: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com>
Cc: maz@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, broonie@kernel.org,
madvenka@linux.microsoft.com, tabba@google.com, will@kernel.org,
qperret@google.com, james.morse@arm.com,
alexandru.elisei@arm.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, andreyknvl@gmail.com,
vincenzo.frascino@arm.com, mhiramat@kernel.org, ast@kernel.org,
drjones@redhat.com, wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com, elver@google.com,
keirf@google.com, yuzenghui@huawei.com, ardb@kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
android-mm@google.com, kernel-team@android.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 16/17] KVM: arm64: Introduce pkvm_dump_backtrace()
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2022 12:16:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YtqHDTpnn376Qb7u@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220721055728.718573-17-kaleshsingh@google.com>
Hi Kalesh,
On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 10:57:27PM -0700, Kalesh Singh wrote:
[...]
> +/*
> + * pkvm_dump_backtrace - Dump the protected nVHE HYP backtrace.
> + *
> + * @hyp_offset: hypervisor offset, used for address translation.
> + *
> + * Dumping of the pKVM HYP backtrace is done by reading the
> + * stack addresses from the shared stacktrace buffer, since the
> + * host cannot direclty access hyperviosr memory in protected
> + * mode.
> + */
> +static void pkvm_dump_backtrace(unsigned long hyp_offset)
> +{
> + unsigned long *stacktrace_entry
> + = (unsigned long *)this_cpu_ptr_nvhe_sym(pkvm_stacktrace);
> + unsigned long va_mask, pc;
> +
> + va_mask = GENMASK_ULL(vabits_actual - 1, 0);
> +
> + kvm_err("Protected nVHE HYP call trace:\n");
This and the footer printks should be put in respective helpers to share
between pKVM and non-pKVM backtrace implementations. I imagine users
will invariably bake some pattern matching to scrape traces, and it
should be consistent between both flavors.
> + /* The stack trace is terminated by a null entry */
> + for (; *stacktrace_entry; stacktrace_entry++) {
At the point we're dumping the backtrace we know that EL2 has already
soiled itself, so we shouldn't explicitly depend on it providing NULL
terminators. I believe this loop should have an explicit range && NULL
check.
--
Thanks,
Oliver
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
To: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com>
Cc: maz@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, broonie@kernel.org,
madvenka@linux.microsoft.com, tabba@google.com, will@kernel.org,
qperret@google.com, james.morse@arm.com,
alexandru.elisei@arm.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, andreyknvl@gmail.com,
vincenzo.frascino@arm.com, mhiramat@kernel.org, ast@kernel.org,
drjones@redhat.com, wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com, elver@google.com,
keirf@google.com, yuzenghui@huawei.com, ardb@kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
android-mm@google.com, kernel-team@android.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 16/17] KVM: arm64: Introduce pkvm_dump_backtrace()
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2022 12:16:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YtqHDTpnn376Qb7u@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220721055728.718573-17-kaleshsingh@google.com>
Hi Kalesh,
On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 10:57:27PM -0700, Kalesh Singh wrote:
[...]
> +/*
> + * pkvm_dump_backtrace - Dump the protected nVHE HYP backtrace.
> + *
> + * @hyp_offset: hypervisor offset, used for address translation.
> + *
> + * Dumping of the pKVM HYP backtrace is done by reading the
> + * stack addresses from the shared stacktrace buffer, since the
> + * host cannot direclty access hyperviosr memory in protected
> + * mode.
> + */
> +static void pkvm_dump_backtrace(unsigned long hyp_offset)
> +{
> + unsigned long *stacktrace_entry
> + = (unsigned long *)this_cpu_ptr_nvhe_sym(pkvm_stacktrace);
> + unsigned long va_mask, pc;
> +
> + va_mask = GENMASK_ULL(vabits_actual - 1, 0);
> +
> + kvm_err("Protected nVHE HYP call trace:\n");
This and the footer printks should be put in respective helpers to share
between pKVM and non-pKVM backtrace implementations. I imagine users
will invariably bake some pattern matching to scrape traces, and it
should be consistent between both flavors.
> + /* The stack trace is terminated by a null entry */
> + for (; *stacktrace_entry; stacktrace_entry++) {
At the point we're dumping the backtrace we know that EL2 has already
soiled itself, so we shouldn't explicitly depend on it providing NULL
terminators. I believe this loop should have an explicit range && NULL
check.
--
Thanks,
Oliver
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-22 11:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 120+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-21 5:57 [PATCH v5 00/17] KVM nVHE Hypervisor stack unwinder Kalesh Singh
2022-07-21 5:57 ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-21 5:57 ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-21 5:57 ` [PATCH v5 01/17] arm64: stacktrace: Add shared header for common stack unwinding code Kalesh Singh
2022-07-21 5:57 ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-21 5:57 ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-21 5:57 ` [PATCH v5 02/17] arm64: stacktrace: Factor out on_accessible_stack_common() Kalesh Singh
2022-07-21 5:57 ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-21 5:57 ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-21 5:57 ` [PATCH v5 03/17] arm64: stacktrace: Factor out unwind_next_common() Kalesh Singh
2022-07-21 5:57 ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-21 5:57 ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-21 5:57 ` [PATCH v5 04/17] arm64: stacktrace: Handle frame pointer from different address spaces Kalesh Singh
2022-07-21 5:57 ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-21 5:57 ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-21 9:57 ` Fuad Tabba
2022-07-21 9:57 ` Fuad Tabba
2022-07-21 9:57 ` Fuad Tabba
2022-07-21 5:57 ` [PATCH v5 05/17] arm64: stacktrace: Factor out common unwind() Kalesh Singh
2022-07-21 5:57 ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-21 5:57 ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-25 14:05 ` Mark Brown
2022-07-25 14:05 ` Mark Brown
2022-07-25 14:05 ` Mark Brown
2022-07-21 5:57 ` [PATCH v5 06/17] arm64: stacktrace: Add description of stacktrace/common.h Kalesh Singh
2022-07-21 5:57 ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-21 5:57 ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-21 9:57 ` Fuad Tabba
2022-07-21 9:57 ` Fuad Tabba
2022-07-21 9:57 ` Fuad Tabba
2022-07-21 5:57 ` [PATCH v5 07/17] KVM: arm64: On stack overflow switch to hyp overflow_stack Kalesh Singh
2022-07-21 5:57 ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-21 5:57 ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-21 5:57 ` [PATCH v5 08/17] KVM: arm64: Add PROTECTED_NVHE_STACKTRACE Kconfig Kalesh Singh
2022-07-21 5:57 ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-21 5:57 ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-21 9:57 ` Fuad Tabba
2022-07-21 9:57 ` Fuad Tabba
2022-07-21 9:57 ` Fuad Tabba
2022-07-21 5:57 ` [PATCH v5 09/17] KVM: arm64: Allocate shared pKVM hyp stacktrace buffers Kalesh Singh
2022-07-21 5:57 ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-21 5:57 ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-21 9:57 ` Fuad Tabba
2022-07-21 9:57 ` Fuad Tabba
2022-07-21 9:57 ` Fuad Tabba
2022-07-21 5:57 ` [PATCH v5 10/17] KVM: arm64: Stub implementation of pKVM HYP stack unwinder Kalesh Singh
2022-07-21 5:57 ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-21 5:57 ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-21 9:58 ` Fuad Tabba
2022-07-21 9:58 ` Fuad Tabba
2022-07-21 9:58 ` Fuad Tabba
2022-07-21 5:57 ` [PATCH v5 11/17] KVM: arm64: Stub implementation of non-protected nVHE " Kalesh Singh
2022-07-21 5:57 ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-21 5:57 ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-21 9:58 ` Fuad Tabba
2022-07-21 9:58 ` Fuad Tabba
2022-07-21 9:58 ` Fuad Tabba
2022-07-21 5:57 ` [PATCH v5 12/17] KVM: arm64: Save protected-nVHE (pKVM) hyp stacktrace Kalesh Singh
2022-07-21 5:57 ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-21 5:57 ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-21 9:58 ` Fuad Tabba
2022-07-21 9:58 ` Fuad Tabba
2022-07-21 9:58 ` Fuad Tabba
2022-07-22 15:33 ` Oliver Upton
2022-07-22 15:33 ` Oliver Upton
2022-07-22 15:33 ` Oliver Upton
2022-07-22 17:28 ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-22 17:28 ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-22 17:28 ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-21 5:57 ` [PATCH v5 13/17] KVM: arm64: Prepare non-protected nVHE hypervisor stacktrace Kalesh Singh
2022-07-21 5:57 ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-21 5:57 ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-21 9:58 ` Fuad Tabba
2022-07-21 9:58 ` Fuad Tabba
2022-07-21 9:58 ` Fuad Tabba
2022-07-21 5:57 ` [PATCH v5 14/17] KVM: arm64: Implement protected nVHE hyp stack unwinder Kalesh Singh
2022-07-21 5:57 ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-21 5:57 ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-21 9:58 ` Fuad Tabba
2022-07-21 9:58 ` Fuad Tabba
2022-07-21 9:58 ` Fuad Tabba
2022-07-21 5:57 ` [PATCH v5 15/17] KVM: arm64: Implement non-protected " Kalesh Singh
2022-07-21 5:57 ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-21 5:57 ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-21 9:58 ` Fuad Tabba
2022-07-21 9:58 ` Fuad Tabba
2022-07-21 9:58 ` Fuad Tabba
2022-07-21 5:57 ` [PATCH v5 16/17] KVM: arm64: Introduce pkvm_dump_backtrace() Kalesh Singh
2022-07-21 5:57 ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-21 5:57 ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-21 9:59 ` Fuad Tabba
2022-07-21 9:59 ` Fuad Tabba
2022-07-21 9:59 ` Fuad Tabba
2022-07-22 11:16 ` Oliver Upton [this message]
2022-07-22 11:16 ` Oliver Upton
2022-07-22 11:16 ` Oliver Upton
2022-07-22 17:25 ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-22 17:25 ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-22 17:25 ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-21 5:57 ` [PATCH v5 17/17] KVM: arm64: Introduce hyp_dump_backtrace() Kalesh Singh
2022-07-21 5:57 ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-21 5:57 ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-21 9:59 ` Fuad Tabba
2022-07-21 9:59 ` Fuad Tabba
2022-07-21 9:59 ` Fuad Tabba
2022-07-21 20:35 ` Oliver Upton
2022-07-21 20:35 ` Oliver Upton
2022-07-21 20:35 ` Oliver Upton
2022-07-22 0:01 ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-22 0:01 ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-22 0:01 ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-21 9:55 ` [PATCH v5 00/17] KVM nVHE Hypervisor stack unwinder Fuad Tabba
2022-07-21 9:55 ` Fuad Tabba
2022-07-21 9:55 ` Fuad Tabba
2022-07-21 16:06 ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-21 16:06 ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-21 16:06 ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-22 10:48 ` Oliver Upton
2022-07-22 10:48 ` Oliver Upton
2022-07-22 10:48 ` Oliver Upton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YtqHDTpnn376Qb7u@google.com \
--to=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=andreyknvl@gmail.com \
--cc=android-mm@google.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=drjones@redhat.com \
--cc=elver@google.com \
--cc=kaleshsingh@google.com \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=madvenka@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \
--cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.