All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: Siddh Raman Pant <code@siddh.me>
Cc: syzbot+c70d87ac1d001f29a058
	<syzbot+c70d87ac1d001f29a058@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>,
	linux-kernel-mentees
	<linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org>,
	linux-security-modules <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>,
	"Fabio M. De Francesco" <fmdefrancesco@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] kernel/watch_queue: Make pipe NULL while clearing watch_queue
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2022 21:12:28 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yun1rC59USrgd0fu@sol.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <18261d8a63a.33799d2a402802.7512018232560408914@siddh.me>

On Wed, Aug 03, 2022 at 09:26:04AM +0530, Siddh Raman Pant wrote:
> On Wed, 03 Aug 2022 06:38:36 +0530  Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 09:21:21PM +0530, Siddh Raman Pant wrote:
> > > If not done, a reference to a freed pipe remains in the watch_queue,
> > > as this function is called before freeing a pipe in free_pipe_info()
> > > (see line 834 of fs/pipe.c).
> > > 
> > > This causes a UAF when post_one_notification() tries to access the pipe
> > > on a key update, which is reported by syzbot.
> > > 
> > > We also need to use READ_ONCE() in post_one_notification() to prevent the
> > > compiler from optimising and loading a non-NULL value from wqueue->pipe.
> > 
> > Didn't this already get fixed by the following commit?
> > 
> >     commit 353f7988dd8413c47718f7ca79c030b6fb62cfe5
> >     Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
> >     Date:   Tue Jul 19 11:09:01 2022 -0700
> > 
> >         watchqueue: make sure to serialize 'wqueue->defunct' properly
> > 
> > With that, post_one_notification() only runs while the watch_queue is locked and
> > not "defunct".  So it's guaranteed that the pipe still exists.  Any concurrent
> > free_pipe_info() waits for the watch_queue to be unlocked in watch_queue_clear()
> > before proceeding to free the pipe.  So where is there still a bug?
> 
> It doesn't fix the dangling pointer to the freed pipe in the watch_queue, which
> had caused this crash.
> 

Under what circumstances is the pipe pointer still being dereferenced after the
pipe has been freed?  I don't see how it can be; see my explanation above.

- Eric
_______________________________________________
Linux-kernel-mentees mailing list
Linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-kernel-mentees

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: Siddh Raman Pant <code@siddh.me>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	"Fabio M. De Francesco" <fmdefrancesco@gmail.com>,
	linux-security-modules <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel-mentees 
	<linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org>,
	syzbot+c70d87ac1d001f29a058 
	<syzbot+c70d87ac1d001f29a058@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] kernel/watch_queue: Make pipe NULL while clearing watch_queue
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2022 21:12:28 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yun1rC59USrgd0fu@sol.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <18261d8a63a.33799d2a402802.7512018232560408914@siddh.me>

On Wed, Aug 03, 2022 at 09:26:04AM +0530, Siddh Raman Pant wrote:
> On Wed, 03 Aug 2022 06:38:36 +0530  Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 09:21:21PM +0530, Siddh Raman Pant wrote:
> > > If not done, a reference to a freed pipe remains in the watch_queue,
> > > as this function is called before freeing a pipe in free_pipe_info()
> > > (see line 834 of fs/pipe.c).
> > > 
> > > This causes a UAF when post_one_notification() tries to access the pipe
> > > on a key update, which is reported by syzbot.
> > > 
> > > We also need to use READ_ONCE() in post_one_notification() to prevent the
> > > compiler from optimising and loading a non-NULL value from wqueue->pipe.
> > 
> > Didn't this already get fixed by the following commit?
> > 
> >     commit 353f7988dd8413c47718f7ca79c030b6fb62cfe5
> >     Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
> >     Date:   Tue Jul 19 11:09:01 2022 -0700
> > 
> >         watchqueue: make sure to serialize 'wqueue->defunct' properly
> > 
> > With that, post_one_notification() only runs while the watch_queue is locked and
> > not "defunct".  So it's guaranteed that the pipe still exists.  Any concurrent
> > free_pipe_info() waits for the watch_queue to be unlocked in watch_queue_clear()
> > before proceeding to free the pipe.  So where is there still a bug?
> 
> It doesn't fix the dangling pointer to the freed pipe in the watch_queue, which
> had caused this crash.
> 

Under what circumstances is the pipe pointer still being dereferenced after the
pipe has been freed?  I don't see how it can be; see my explanation above.

- Eric

  reply	other threads:[~2022-08-03  4:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-28 15:51 [PATCH v3] kernel/watch_queue: Make pipe NULL while clearing watch_queue Siddh Raman Pant via Linux-kernel-mentees
2022-07-28 15:51 ` Siddh Raman Pant
2022-08-01  9:34 ` Siddh Raman Pant via Linux-kernel-mentees
2022-08-01  9:34   ` Siddh Raman Pant
2022-08-01 10:24   ` Greg KH
2022-08-01 10:24     ` Greg KH
2022-08-01 12:58     ` Siddh Raman Pant via Linux-kernel-mentees
2022-08-01 12:58       ` Siddh Raman Pant
2022-08-01 13:00       ` Siddh Raman Pant via Linux-kernel-mentees
2022-08-01 13:00         ` Siddh Raman Pant
2022-08-01 16:16         ` Dipanjan Das
2022-08-01 16:16           ` Dipanjan Das
2022-08-01 18:49           ` Siddh Raman Pant via Linux-kernel-mentees
2022-08-01 18:49             ` Siddh Raman Pant
2022-08-03  1:16             ` Eric Biggers
2022-08-03  1:16               ` Eric Biggers
2022-08-03  3:58               ` Siddh Raman Pant via Linux-kernel-mentees
2022-08-03  3:58                 ` Siddh Raman Pant
2022-08-03  4:10             ` Dipanjan Das
2022-08-03  4:10               ` Dipanjan Das
2022-08-03  1:08 ` Eric Biggers
2022-08-03  1:08   ` Eric Biggers
2022-08-03  3:56   ` Siddh Raman Pant via Linux-kernel-mentees
2022-08-03  3:56     ` Siddh Raman Pant
2022-08-03  4:12     ` Eric Biggers [this message]
2022-08-03  4:12       ` Eric Biggers
2022-08-03  5:13       ` Siddh Raman Pant via Linux-kernel-mentees
2022-08-03  5:13         ` Siddh Raman Pant
2022-08-03  5:41         ` Eric Biggers
2022-08-03  5:41           ` Eric Biggers
2022-08-03  8:40           ` Siddh Raman Pant via Linux-kernel-mentees
2022-08-03  8:40             ` Siddh Raman Pant
2022-08-03 18:15             ` Eric Biggers
2022-08-03 18:15               ` Eric Biggers
2022-08-04  8:39               ` Siddh Raman Pant via Linux-kernel-mentees
2022-08-04  8:39                 ` Siddh Raman Pant

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Yun1rC59USrgd0fu@sol.localdomain \
    --to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
    --cc=christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr \
    --cc=code@siddh.me \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=fmdefrancesco@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=syzbot+c70d87ac1d001f29a058@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.