From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>, ChiYuan Huang <cy_huang@richtek.com>
Cc: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>,
ChiaEn Wu <chiaen_wu@richtek.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] mfd: mt6370: add bounds checking to regmap_read/write functions
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2022 08:25:34 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yv8ezribLQbq5ggv@kili> (raw)
It looks like there are a potential out of bounds accesses in the
read/write() functions. Also can "len" be negative? Let's check for
that too.
Fixes: ab9905c5e38e ("mfd: mt6370: Add MediaTek MT6370 support")
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
---
From static analysis. This code is obviously harmless however it may
not be required. The regmap range checking is slightly complicated and
I haven't remembered where all it's done.
drivers/mfd/mt6370.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/mfd/mt6370.c b/drivers/mfd/mt6370.c
index cf19cce2fdc0..fd5e1d6a0272 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/mt6370.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/mt6370.c
@@ -190,6 +190,9 @@ static int mt6370_regmap_read(void *context, const void *reg_buf,
bank_idx = u8_buf[0];
bank_addr = u8_buf[1];
+ if (bank_idx >= ARRAY_SIZE(info->i2c))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
ret = i2c_smbus_read_i2c_block_data(info->i2c[bank_idx], bank_addr,
val_size, val_buf);
if (ret < 0)
@@ -211,6 +214,9 @@ static int mt6370_regmap_write(void *context, const void *data, size_t count)
bank_idx = u8_buf[0];
bank_addr = u8_buf[1];
+ if (len < 0 || bank_idx >= ARRAY_SIZE(info->i2c))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
return i2c_smbus_write_i2c_block_data(info->i2c[bank_idx], bank_addr,
len, data + MT6370_MAX_ADDRLEN);
}
--
2.35.1
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>, ChiYuan Huang <cy_huang@richtek.com>
Cc: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>,
ChiaEn Wu <chiaen_wu@richtek.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] mfd: mt6370: add bounds checking to regmap_read/write functions
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2022 08:25:34 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yv8ezribLQbq5ggv@kili> (raw)
It looks like there are a potential out of bounds accesses in the
read/write() functions. Also can "len" be negative? Let's check for
that too.
Fixes: ab9905c5e38e ("mfd: mt6370: Add MediaTek MT6370 support")
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
---
From static analysis. This code is obviously harmless however it may
not be required. The regmap range checking is slightly complicated and
I haven't remembered where all it's done.
drivers/mfd/mt6370.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/mfd/mt6370.c b/drivers/mfd/mt6370.c
index cf19cce2fdc0..fd5e1d6a0272 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/mt6370.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/mt6370.c
@@ -190,6 +190,9 @@ static int mt6370_regmap_read(void *context, const void *reg_buf,
bank_idx = u8_buf[0];
bank_addr = u8_buf[1];
+ if (bank_idx >= ARRAY_SIZE(info->i2c))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
ret = i2c_smbus_read_i2c_block_data(info->i2c[bank_idx], bank_addr,
val_size, val_buf);
if (ret < 0)
@@ -211,6 +214,9 @@ static int mt6370_regmap_write(void *context, const void *data, size_t count)
bank_idx = u8_buf[0];
bank_addr = u8_buf[1];
+ if (len < 0 || bank_idx >= ARRAY_SIZE(info->i2c))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
return i2c_smbus_write_i2c_block_data(info->i2c[bank_idx], bank_addr,
len, data + MT6370_MAX_ADDRLEN);
}
--
2.35.1
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next reply other threads:[~2022-08-19 5:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-19 5:25 Dan Carpenter [this message]
2022-08-19 5:25 ` [PATCH] mfd: mt6370: add bounds checking to regmap_read/write functions Dan Carpenter
2022-08-19 6:27 ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-08-19 6:27 ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-08-22 12:57 ` Dan Carpenter
2022-08-22 12:57 ` Dan Carpenter
2022-09-08 6:57 ` Lee Jones
2022-09-08 6:57 ` Lee Jones
2022-09-08 7:54 ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-09-08 7:54 ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-09-08 10:49 ` Dan Carpenter
2022-09-08 10:49 ` Dan Carpenter
2022-09-09 6:59 ` Lee Jones
2022-09-09 6:59 ` Lee Jones
2022-09-14 1:33 ` ChiYuan Huang
2022-09-14 1:33 ` ChiYuan Huang
2022-08-23 22:09 ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-08-23 22:09 ` Andy Shevchenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Yv8ezribLQbq5ggv@kili \
--to=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
--cc=chiaen_wu@richtek.com \
--cc=cy_huang@richtek.com \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lee@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.