From: Colton Lewis <coltonlewis@google.com>
To: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, maz@kernel.org,
seanjc@google.com, oupton@google.com, ricarkol@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] KVM: selftests: Randomize page access order
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2022 16:24:13 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YvZ+rTKd8dmezzgu@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YvREA1VJA3ryF+io@google.com>
On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 04:49:23PM -0700, David Matlack wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 05:58:30PM +0000, Colton Lewis wrote:
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/perf_test_util.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/perf_test_util.c
> > index 3c7b93349fef..9838d1ad9166 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/perf_test_util.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/perf_test_util.c
> > @@ -52,6 +52,9 @@ void perf_test_guest_code(uint32_t vcpu_idx)
> > struct perf_test_vcpu_args *vcpu_args = &pta->vcpu_args[vcpu_idx];
> > uint64_t gva;
> > uint64_t pages;
> > + uint64_t addr;
> > + bool random_access = pta->random_access;
> > + bool populated = false;
> > int i;
> >
> > gva = vcpu_args->gva;
> > @@ -62,7 +65,11 @@ void perf_test_guest_code(uint32_t vcpu_idx)
> >
> > while (true) {
> > for (i = 0; i < pages; i++) {
> > - uint64_t addr = gva + (i * pta->guest_page_size);
> > + if (populated && random_access)
>
> Skipping the populate phase makes sense to ensure everything is
> populated I guess. What was your rational?
That's it. Wanted to ensure everything was populated. Random
population won't hit every page, but those unpopulated pages might be
hit on subsequent iterations. I originally let population be random
too and suspect this was driving an odd behavior I noticed early in
testing where later iterations would be much faster than earlier ones.
> Either way I think this policy should be driven by the test, rather than
> harde-coded in perf_test_guest_code(). i.e. Move the call
> perf_test_set_random_access() in dirty_log_perf_test.c to just after the
> population phase.
That makes sense. Will do.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-12 16:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-10 17:58 [PATCH 0/3] KVM: selftests: Randomize memory access of dirty_log_perf_test Colton Lewis
2022-08-10 17:58 ` [PATCH 1/3] KVM: selftests: Add random table to randomize memory access Colton Lewis
2022-08-10 23:18 ` David Matlack
2022-08-10 23:26 ` David Matlack
2022-08-12 16:09 ` Colton Lewis
2022-08-10 17:58 ` [PATCH 2/3] KVM: selftests: Randomize which pages are written vs read Colton Lewis
2022-08-10 23:33 ` David Matlack
2022-08-10 23:37 ` David Matlack
2022-08-12 16:11 ` Colton Lewis
2022-08-10 17:58 ` [PATCH 3/3] KVM: selftests: Randomize page access order Colton Lewis
2022-08-10 23:49 ` David Matlack
2022-08-12 16:24 ` Colton Lewis [this message]
2022-08-12 16:28 ` David Matlack
2022-08-12 16:40 ` Colton Lewis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YvZ+rTKd8dmezzgu@google.com \
--to=coltonlewis@google.com \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oupton@google.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=ricarkol@google.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.