All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org>
To: Waiman Long <longman-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
	Vincent Guittot
	<vincent.guittot-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt-nx8X9YLhiw1AfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org>,
	Ben Segall <bsegall-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>,
	Daniel Bristot de Oliveira
	<bristot-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
	Valentin Schneider
	<vschneid-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
	Tejun Heo <tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
	Zefan Li <lizefan.x-EC8Uxl6Npydl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes-druUgvl0LCNAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org>,
	Will Deacon <will-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
	cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	Linus Torvalds
	<torvalds-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] sched: Use user_cpus_ptr for saving user provided cpumask in sched_setaffinity()
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2022 10:28:50 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YvymwlTkdsVDtmRB@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220816192734.67115-2-longman-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>

On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 03:27:32PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:

> This will be some changes in behavior for arm64 systems with asymmetric
> CPUs in some corner cases. For instance, if sched_setaffinity()
> has never been called and there is a cpuset change before
> relax_compatible_cpus_allowed_ptr() is called, its subsequent call will
> follow what the cpuset allows but not what the previous cpu affinity
> setting allows.

That's arguably a correctness fix, no? That is, the save/restore should
not have been allowed to revert to an earlier cpuset state.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
	Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Zefan Li <lizefan.x@bytedance.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] sched: Use user_cpus_ptr for saving user provided cpumask in sched_setaffinity()
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2022 10:28:50 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YvymwlTkdsVDtmRB@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220816192734.67115-2-longman@redhat.com>

On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 03:27:32PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:

> This will be some changes in behavior for arm64 systems with asymmetric
> CPUs in some corner cases. For instance, if sched_setaffinity()
> has never been called and there is a cpuset change before
> relax_compatible_cpus_allowed_ptr() is called, its subsequent call will
> follow what the cpuset allows but not what the previous cpu affinity
> setting allows.

That's arguably a correctness fix, no? That is, the save/restore should
not have been allowed to revert to an earlier cpuset state.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-08-17  8:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-16 19:27 [PATCH v5 0/3] sched, cgroup/cpuset: Keep user set cpus affinity Waiman Long
2022-08-16 19:27 ` Waiman Long
     [not found] ` <20220816192734.67115-1-longman-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2022-08-16 19:27   ` [PATCH v5 1/3] sched: Use user_cpus_ptr for saving user provided cpumask in sched_setaffinity() Waiman Long
2022-08-16 19:27     ` Waiman Long
2022-08-17  8:41     ` Peter Zijlstra
     [not found]       ` <Yvyp02LLIQQPs5d6-IIpfhp3q70z/8w/KjCw3T+5/BudmfyzbbVWyRVo5IupeoWH0uzbU5w@public.gmane.org>
2022-08-18 15:31         ` Waiman Long
2022-08-18 15:31           ` Waiman Long
     [not found]     ` <20220816192734.67115-2-longman-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2022-08-17  8:28       ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2022-08-17  8:28         ` Peter Zijlstra
     [not found]         ` <YvymwlTkdsVDtmRB-IIpfhp3q70z/8w/KjCw3T+5/BudmfyzbbVWyRVo5IupeoWH0uzbU5w@public.gmane.org>
2022-08-18 14:37           ` Waiman Long
2022-08-18 14:37             ` Waiman Long
2022-08-17  8:46       ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-08-17  8:46         ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-08-16 19:27   ` [PATCH v5 2/3] sched: Provide copy_user_cpus_mask() to copy out user mask Waiman Long
2022-08-16 19:27     ` Waiman Long
2022-08-16 19:27   ` [PATCH v5 3/3] cgroup/cpuset: Keep user set cpus affinity Waiman Long
2022-08-16 19:27     ` Waiman Long
     [not found]     ` <20220816192734.67115-4-longman-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2022-08-16 20:15       ` Tejun Heo
2022-08-16 20:15         ` Tejun Heo
     [not found]         ` <Yvv66EWygCwHUCqy-NiLfg/pYEd1N0TnZuCh8vA@public.gmane.org>
2022-08-16 22:11           ` Waiman Long
2022-08-16 22:11             ` Waiman Long
     [not found]             ` <c10e4f69-9951-6c38-6e28-fafcaec00d89-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2022-08-16 22:19               ` Tejun Heo
2022-08-16 22:19                 ` Tejun Heo
     [not found]                 ` <YvwX24GXadKQNp6V-NiLfg/pYEd1N0TnZuCh8vA@public.gmane.org>
2022-08-17  0:13                   ` Waiman Long
2022-08-17  0:13                     ` Waiman Long

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YvymwlTkdsVDtmRB@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz-wegcikhe2lqwvfeawa7xhq@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=bristot-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=bsegall-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=hannes-druUgvl0LCNAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=juri.lelli-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=lizefan.x-EC8Uxl6Npydl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=longman-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=mgorman-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=mingo-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=rostedt-nx8X9YLhiw1AfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=torvalds-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=vincent.guittot-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=vschneid-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=will-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.