From: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>,
David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/14] KVM: arm64: Parallel stage-2 fault handling
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2022 11:01:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YxsPFltAMvls/A9n@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87o7vsvn4m.wl-maz@kernel.org>
Hey Marc,
On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 11:00:09AM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
[...]
> This fails to build on -rc4:
>
> MODPOST vmlinux.symvers
> MODINFO modules.builtin.modinfo
> GEN modules.builtin
> CC .vmlinux.export.o
> LD .tmp_vmlinux.kallsyms1
> ld: Unexpected GOT/PLT entries detected!
> ld: Unexpected run-time procedure linkages detected!
> ld: ID map text too big or misaligned
> ld: arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/kvm_nvhe.o: in function `__kvm_nvhe_kvm_pgtable_walk':
> (.hyp.text+0xdc0c): undefined reference to `__kvm_nvhe___rcu_read_lock'
> ld: (.hyp.text+0xdc1c): undefined reference to `__kvm_nvhe___rcu_read_unlock'
> ld: arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/kvm_nvhe.o: in function `__kvm_nvhe_kvm_pgtable_get_leaf':
> (.hyp.text+0xdc80): undefined reference to `__kvm_nvhe___rcu_read_lock'
> ld: (.hyp.text+0xdc90): undefined reference to `__kvm_nvhe___rcu_read_unlock'
> ld: arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/kvm_nvhe.o: in function `__kvm_nvhe_kvm_pgtable_hyp_map':
> (.hyp.text+0xddb0): undefined reference to `__kvm_nvhe___rcu_read_lock'
> ld: (.hyp.text+0xddc0): undefined reference to `__kvm_nvhe___rcu_read_unlock'
> ld: arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/kvm_nvhe.o: in function `__kvm_nvhe_kvm_pgtable_hyp_unmap':
> (.hyp.text+0xde44): undefined reference to `__kvm_nvhe___rcu_read_lock'
> ld: (.hyp.text+0xde50): undefined reference to `__kvm_nvhe___rcu_read_unlock'
> ld: arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/kvm_nvhe.o: in function `__kvm_nvhe_kvm_pgtable_hyp_destroy':
> (.hyp.text+0xdf40): undefined reference to `__kvm_nvhe___rcu_read_lock'
> ld: (.hyp.text+0xdf50): undefined reference to `__kvm_nvhe___rcu_read_unlock'
> ld: arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/kvm_nvhe.o: in function `__kvm_nvhe_kvm_pgtable_stage2_map':
> (.hyp.text+0xe16c): undefined reference to `__kvm_nvhe___rcu_read_lock'
> ld: (.hyp.text+0xe17c): undefined reference to `__kvm_nvhe___rcu_read_unlock'
> ld: arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/kvm_nvhe.o: in function `__kvm_nvhe_kvm_pgtable_stage2_set_owner':
> (.hyp.text+0xe264): undefined reference to `__kvm_nvhe___rcu_read_lock'
> ld: (.hyp.text+0xe274): undefined reference to `__kvm_nvhe___rcu_read_unlock'
> ld: arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/kvm_nvhe.o: in function `__kvm_nvhe_kvm_pgtable_stage2_unmap':
> (.hyp.text+0xe2d4): undefined reference to `__kvm_nvhe___rcu_read_lock'
> ld: (.hyp.text+0xe2e4): undefined reference to `__kvm_nvhe___rcu_read_unlock'
> ld: arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/kvm_nvhe.o: in function `__kvm_nvhe_kvm_pgtable_stage2_flush':
> (.hyp.text+0xe5b4): undefined reference to `__kvm_nvhe___rcu_read_lock'
> ld: (.hyp.text+0xe5c4): undefined reference to `__kvm_nvhe___rcu_read_unlock'
> ld: arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/kvm_nvhe.o: in function `__kvm_nvhe_kvm_pgtable_stage2_destroy':
> (.hyp.text+0xe6f0): undefined reference to `__kvm_nvhe___rcu_read_lock'
> ld: (.hyp.text+0xe700): undefined reference to `__kvm_nvhe___rcu_read_unlock'
> make[3]: *** [Makefile:1169: vmlinux] Error 1
> make[2]: *** [debian/rules:7: build-arch] Error 2
>
> as this drags the RCU read-lock into EL2, and that's not going to
> work... The following fixes it, but I wonder how you tested it.
Ugh. I was carrying a patch on top of my series to handle compilation
issues with rseq_test, I managed to squash the equivalent of below in
that patch.
Nonetheless, I *did* actually test it to get the numbers above :)
--
Thanks,
Oliver
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_pgtable.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_pgtable.h
> index dc839db86a1a..adf170122daf 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_pgtable.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_pgtable.h
> @@ -580,7 +580,7 @@ enum kvm_pgtable_prot kvm_pgtable_stage2_pte_prot(kvm_pte_t pte);
> */
> enum kvm_pgtable_prot kvm_pgtable_hyp_pte_prot(kvm_pte_t pte);
>
> -#if defined(__KVM_NVHE_HYPERVISOR___)
> +#if defined(__KVM_NVHE_HYPERVISOR__)
>
> static inline void kvm_pgtable_walk_begin(void) {}
> static inline void kvm_pgtable_walk_end(void) {}
>
> --
> Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>,
Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>,
Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>,
David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>,
Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/14] KVM: arm64: Parallel stage-2 fault handling
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2022 11:01:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YxsPFltAMvls/A9n@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87o7vsvn4m.wl-maz@kernel.org>
Hey Marc,
On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 11:00:09AM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
[...]
> This fails to build on -rc4:
>
> MODPOST vmlinux.symvers
> MODINFO modules.builtin.modinfo
> GEN modules.builtin
> CC .vmlinux.export.o
> LD .tmp_vmlinux.kallsyms1
> ld: Unexpected GOT/PLT entries detected!
> ld: Unexpected run-time procedure linkages detected!
> ld: ID map text too big or misaligned
> ld: arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/kvm_nvhe.o: in function `__kvm_nvhe_kvm_pgtable_walk':
> (.hyp.text+0xdc0c): undefined reference to `__kvm_nvhe___rcu_read_lock'
> ld: (.hyp.text+0xdc1c): undefined reference to `__kvm_nvhe___rcu_read_unlock'
> ld: arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/kvm_nvhe.o: in function `__kvm_nvhe_kvm_pgtable_get_leaf':
> (.hyp.text+0xdc80): undefined reference to `__kvm_nvhe___rcu_read_lock'
> ld: (.hyp.text+0xdc90): undefined reference to `__kvm_nvhe___rcu_read_unlock'
> ld: arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/kvm_nvhe.o: in function `__kvm_nvhe_kvm_pgtable_hyp_map':
> (.hyp.text+0xddb0): undefined reference to `__kvm_nvhe___rcu_read_lock'
> ld: (.hyp.text+0xddc0): undefined reference to `__kvm_nvhe___rcu_read_unlock'
> ld: arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/kvm_nvhe.o: in function `__kvm_nvhe_kvm_pgtable_hyp_unmap':
> (.hyp.text+0xde44): undefined reference to `__kvm_nvhe___rcu_read_lock'
> ld: (.hyp.text+0xde50): undefined reference to `__kvm_nvhe___rcu_read_unlock'
> ld: arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/kvm_nvhe.o: in function `__kvm_nvhe_kvm_pgtable_hyp_destroy':
> (.hyp.text+0xdf40): undefined reference to `__kvm_nvhe___rcu_read_lock'
> ld: (.hyp.text+0xdf50): undefined reference to `__kvm_nvhe___rcu_read_unlock'
> ld: arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/kvm_nvhe.o: in function `__kvm_nvhe_kvm_pgtable_stage2_map':
> (.hyp.text+0xe16c): undefined reference to `__kvm_nvhe___rcu_read_lock'
> ld: (.hyp.text+0xe17c): undefined reference to `__kvm_nvhe___rcu_read_unlock'
> ld: arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/kvm_nvhe.o: in function `__kvm_nvhe_kvm_pgtable_stage2_set_owner':
> (.hyp.text+0xe264): undefined reference to `__kvm_nvhe___rcu_read_lock'
> ld: (.hyp.text+0xe274): undefined reference to `__kvm_nvhe___rcu_read_unlock'
> ld: arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/kvm_nvhe.o: in function `__kvm_nvhe_kvm_pgtable_stage2_unmap':
> (.hyp.text+0xe2d4): undefined reference to `__kvm_nvhe___rcu_read_lock'
> ld: (.hyp.text+0xe2e4): undefined reference to `__kvm_nvhe___rcu_read_unlock'
> ld: arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/kvm_nvhe.o: in function `__kvm_nvhe_kvm_pgtable_stage2_flush':
> (.hyp.text+0xe5b4): undefined reference to `__kvm_nvhe___rcu_read_lock'
> ld: (.hyp.text+0xe5c4): undefined reference to `__kvm_nvhe___rcu_read_unlock'
> ld: arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/kvm_nvhe.o: in function `__kvm_nvhe_kvm_pgtable_stage2_destroy':
> (.hyp.text+0xe6f0): undefined reference to `__kvm_nvhe___rcu_read_lock'
> ld: (.hyp.text+0xe700): undefined reference to `__kvm_nvhe___rcu_read_unlock'
> make[3]: *** [Makefile:1169: vmlinux] Error 1
> make[2]: *** [debian/rules:7: build-arch] Error 2
>
> as this drags the RCU read-lock into EL2, and that's not going to
> work... The following fixes it, but I wonder how you tested it.
Ugh. I was carrying a patch on top of my series to handle compilation
issues with rseq_test, I managed to squash the equivalent of below in
that patch.
Nonetheless, I *did* actually test it to get the numbers above :)
--
Thanks,
Oliver
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_pgtable.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_pgtable.h
> index dc839db86a1a..adf170122daf 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_pgtable.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_pgtable.h
> @@ -580,7 +580,7 @@ enum kvm_pgtable_prot kvm_pgtable_stage2_pte_prot(kvm_pte_t pte);
> */
> enum kvm_pgtable_prot kvm_pgtable_hyp_pte_prot(kvm_pte_t pte);
>
> -#if defined(__KVM_NVHE_HYPERVISOR___)
> +#if defined(__KVM_NVHE_HYPERVISOR__)
>
> static inline void kvm_pgtable_walk_begin(void) {}
> static inline void kvm_pgtable_walk_end(void) {}
>
> --
> Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>,
Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>,
Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>,
David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>,
Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/14] KVM: arm64: Parallel stage-2 fault handling
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2022 11:01:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YxsPFltAMvls/A9n@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87o7vsvn4m.wl-maz@kernel.org>
Hey Marc,
On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 11:00:09AM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
[...]
> This fails to build on -rc4:
>
> MODPOST vmlinux.symvers
> MODINFO modules.builtin.modinfo
> GEN modules.builtin
> CC .vmlinux.export.o
> LD .tmp_vmlinux.kallsyms1
> ld: Unexpected GOT/PLT entries detected!
> ld: Unexpected run-time procedure linkages detected!
> ld: ID map text too big or misaligned
> ld: arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/kvm_nvhe.o: in function `__kvm_nvhe_kvm_pgtable_walk':
> (.hyp.text+0xdc0c): undefined reference to `__kvm_nvhe___rcu_read_lock'
> ld: (.hyp.text+0xdc1c): undefined reference to `__kvm_nvhe___rcu_read_unlock'
> ld: arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/kvm_nvhe.o: in function `__kvm_nvhe_kvm_pgtable_get_leaf':
> (.hyp.text+0xdc80): undefined reference to `__kvm_nvhe___rcu_read_lock'
> ld: (.hyp.text+0xdc90): undefined reference to `__kvm_nvhe___rcu_read_unlock'
> ld: arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/kvm_nvhe.o: in function `__kvm_nvhe_kvm_pgtable_hyp_map':
> (.hyp.text+0xddb0): undefined reference to `__kvm_nvhe___rcu_read_lock'
> ld: (.hyp.text+0xddc0): undefined reference to `__kvm_nvhe___rcu_read_unlock'
> ld: arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/kvm_nvhe.o: in function `__kvm_nvhe_kvm_pgtable_hyp_unmap':
> (.hyp.text+0xde44): undefined reference to `__kvm_nvhe___rcu_read_lock'
> ld: (.hyp.text+0xde50): undefined reference to `__kvm_nvhe___rcu_read_unlock'
> ld: arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/kvm_nvhe.o: in function `__kvm_nvhe_kvm_pgtable_hyp_destroy':
> (.hyp.text+0xdf40): undefined reference to `__kvm_nvhe___rcu_read_lock'
> ld: (.hyp.text+0xdf50): undefined reference to `__kvm_nvhe___rcu_read_unlock'
> ld: arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/kvm_nvhe.o: in function `__kvm_nvhe_kvm_pgtable_stage2_map':
> (.hyp.text+0xe16c): undefined reference to `__kvm_nvhe___rcu_read_lock'
> ld: (.hyp.text+0xe17c): undefined reference to `__kvm_nvhe___rcu_read_unlock'
> ld: arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/kvm_nvhe.o: in function `__kvm_nvhe_kvm_pgtable_stage2_set_owner':
> (.hyp.text+0xe264): undefined reference to `__kvm_nvhe___rcu_read_lock'
> ld: (.hyp.text+0xe274): undefined reference to `__kvm_nvhe___rcu_read_unlock'
> ld: arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/kvm_nvhe.o: in function `__kvm_nvhe_kvm_pgtable_stage2_unmap':
> (.hyp.text+0xe2d4): undefined reference to `__kvm_nvhe___rcu_read_lock'
> ld: (.hyp.text+0xe2e4): undefined reference to `__kvm_nvhe___rcu_read_unlock'
> ld: arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/kvm_nvhe.o: in function `__kvm_nvhe_kvm_pgtable_stage2_flush':
> (.hyp.text+0xe5b4): undefined reference to `__kvm_nvhe___rcu_read_lock'
> ld: (.hyp.text+0xe5c4): undefined reference to `__kvm_nvhe___rcu_read_unlock'
> ld: arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/kvm_nvhe.o: in function `__kvm_nvhe_kvm_pgtable_stage2_destroy':
> (.hyp.text+0xe6f0): undefined reference to `__kvm_nvhe___rcu_read_lock'
> ld: (.hyp.text+0xe700): undefined reference to `__kvm_nvhe___rcu_read_unlock'
> make[3]: *** [Makefile:1169: vmlinux] Error 1
> make[2]: *** [debian/rules:7: build-arch] Error 2
>
> as this drags the RCU read-lock into EL2, and that's not going to
> work... The following fixes it, but I wonder how you tested it.
Ugh. I was carrying a patch on top of my series to handle compilation
issues with rseq_test, I managed to squash the equivalent of below in
that patch.
Nonetheless, I *did* actually test it to get the numbers above :)
--
Thanks,
Oliver
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_pgtable.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_pgtable.h
> index dc839db86a1a..adf170122daf 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_pgtable.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_pgtable.h
> @@ -580,7 +580,7 @@ enum kvm_pgtable_prot kvm_pgtable_stage2_pte_prot(kvm_pte_t pte);
> */
> enum kvm_pgtable_prot kvm_pgtable_hyp_pte_prot(kvm_pte_t pte);
>
> -#if defined(__KVM_NVHE_HYPERVISOR___)
> +#if defined(__KVM_NVHE_HYPERVISOR__)
>
> static inline void kvm_pgtable_walk_begin(void) {}
> static inline void kvm_pgtable_walk_end(void) {}
>
> --
> Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-09 10:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 96+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-30 19:41 [PATCH 00/14] KVM: arm64: Parallel stage-2 fault handling Oliver Upton
2022-08-30 19:41 ` Oliver Upton
2022-08-30 19:41 ` Oliver Upton
2022-08-30 19:41 ` [PATCH 01/14] KVM: arm64: Add a helper to tear down unlinked stage-2 subtrees Oliver Upton
2022-08-30 19:41 ` Oliver Upton
2022-08-30 19:41 ` Oliver Upton
2022-08-30 19:41 ` [PATCH 02/14] KVM: arm64: Tear down unlinked stage-2 subtree after break-before-make Oliver Upton
2022-08-30 19:41 ` Oliver Upton
2022-08-30 19:41 ` Oliver Upton
2022-09-06 14:35 ` Quentin Perret
2022-09-06 14:35 ` Quentin Perret
2022-09-06 14:35 ` Quentin Perret
2022-09-09 10:04 ` Oliver Upton
2022-09-09 10:04 ` Oliver Upton
2022-09-09 10:04 ` Oliver Upton
2022-09-07 20:57 ` David Matlack
2022-09-07 20:57 ` David Matlack
2022-09-07 20:57 ` David Matlack
2022-09-09 10:07 ` Oliver Upton
2022-09-09 10:07 ` Oliver Upton
2022-09-09 10:07 ` Oliver Upton
2022-09-14 0:20 ` Ricardo Koller
2022-09-14 0:20 ` Ricardo Koller
2022-09-14 0:20 ` Ricardo Koller
2022-10-10 3:58 ` Oliver Upton
2022-10-10 3:58 ` Oliver Upton
2022-10-10 3:58 ` Oliver Upton
2022-08-30 19:41 ` [PATCH 03/14] KVM: arm64: Directly read owner id field in stage2_pte_is_counted() Oliver Upton
2022-08-30 19:41 ` Oliver Upton
2022-08-30 19:41 ` Oliver Upton
2022-08-30 19:41 ` [PATCH 04/14] KVM: arm64: Read the PTE once per visit Oliver Upton
2022-08-30 19:41 ` Oliver Upton
2022-08-30 19:41 ` Oliver Upton
2022-08-30 19:41 ` [PATCH 05/14] KVM: arm64: Split init and set for table PTE Oliver Upton
2022-08-30 19:41 ` Oliver Upton
2022-08-30 19:41 ` Oliver Upton
2022-08-30 19:41 ` [PATCH 06/14] KVM: arm64: Return next table from map callbacks Oliver Upton
2022-08-30 19:41 ` Oliver Upton
2022-08-30 19:41 ` Oliver Upton
2022-09-07 21:32 ` David Matlack
2022-09-07 21:32 ` David Matlack
2022-09-07 21:32 ` David Matlack
2022-09-09 9:38 ` Oliver Upton
2022-09-09 9:38 ` Oliver Upton
2022-09-09 9:38 ` Oliver Upton
2022-08-30 19:41 ` [PATCH 07/14] KVM: arm64: Document behavior of pgtable visitor callback Oliver Upton
2022-08-30 19:41 ` Oliver Upton
2022-08-30 19:41 ` Oliver Upton
2022-08-30 19:41 ` [PATCH 08/14] KVM: arm64: Protect page table traversal with RCU Oliver Upton
2022-08-30 19:41 ` Oliver Upton
2022-08-30 19:41 ` Oliver Upton
2022-09-07 21:47 ` David Matlack
2022-09-07 21:47 ` David Matlack
2022-09-07 21:47 ` David Matlack
2022-09-09 9:55 ` Oliver Upton
2022-09-09 9:55 ` Oliver Upton
2022-09-09 9:55 ` Oliver Upton
2022-08-30 19:41 ` [PATCH 09/14] KVM: arm64: Free removed stage-2 tables in RCU callback Oliver Upton
2022-08-30 19:41 ` Oliver Upton
2022-08-30 19:41 ` Oliver Upton
2022-09-07 22:00 ` David Matlack
2022-09-07 22:00 ` David Matlack
2022-09-07 22:00 ` David Matlack
2022-09-08 16:40 ` David Matlack
2022-09-08 16:40 ` David Matlack
2022-09-08 16:40 ` David Matlack
2022-09-14 0:49 ` Ricardo Koller
2022-09-14 0:49 ` Ricardo Koller
2022-09-14 0:49 ` Ricardo Koller
2022-08-30 19:50 ` [PATCH 10/14] KVM: arm64: Atomically update stage 2 leaf attributes in parallel walks Oliver Upton
2022-08-30 19:50 ` Oliver Upton
2022-08-30 19:50 ` Oliver Upton
2022-08-30 19:51 ` [PATCH 11/14] KVM: arm64: Make changes block->table to leaf PTEs parallel-aware Oliver Upton
2022-08-30 19:51 ` Oliver Upton
2022-08-30 19:51 ` Oliver Upton
2022-09-14 0:51 ` Ricardo Koller
2022-09-14 0:51 ` Ricardo Koller
2022-09-14 0:51 ` Ricardo Koller
2022-09-14 0:53 ` Ricardo Koller
2022-09-14 0:53 ` Ricardo Koller
2022-09-14 0:53 ` Ricardo Koller
2022-08-30 19:51 ` [PATCH 12/14] KVM: arm64: Make leaf->leaf PTE changes parallel-aware Oliver Upton
2022-08-30 19:51 ` Oliver Upton
2022-08-30 19:51 ` Oliver Upton
2022-08-30 19:51 ` [PATCH 13/14] KVM: arm64: Make table->block " Oliver Upton
2022-08-30 19:51 ` Oliver Upton
2022-08-30 19:51 ` Oliver Upton
2022-08-30 19:52 ` [PATCH 14/14] KVM: arm64: Handle stage-2 faults in parallel Oliver Upton
2022-08-30 19:52 ` Oliver Upton
2022-08-30 19:52 ` Oliver Upton
2022-09-06 10:00 ` [PATCH 00/14] KVM: arm64: Parallel stage-2 fault handling Marc Zyngier
2022-09-06 10:00 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-09-06 10:00 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-09-09 10:01 ` Oliver Upton [this message]
2022-09-09 10:01 ` Oliver Upton
2022-09-09 10:01 ` Oliver Upton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YxsPFltAMvls/A9n@google.com \
--to=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=bgardon@google.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.