All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
To: Li Wang <liwang@redhat.com>
Cc: Richard Palethorpe <rpalethorpe@suse.com>,
	LTP List <ltp@lists.linux.it>,
	Martin Doucha <martin.doucha@suse.com>,
	automated-testing@lists.yoctoproject.org
Subject: Re: [LTP] September LTP release
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2022 13:50:28 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YyBuhAed+rlLDYGd@yuki> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEemH2eNjP++fxhP5ZSsX+fq5vAd6h0_qNX6Rx82AdpzN9fyGQ@mail.gmail.com>

Hi!
> Well, if more than three people are involved in the release work,
> I think that the release workflow should be arranged in time order,
> otherwise, we're easily going to fall into chaos. e.g.
> 
> Assumption work starting from the second week of the release month:
> 
> 1. Collecting the patch list for a new release, like this email does (Cyril)
> 
> 2. Reviewing and merging the patch list of step1 (All maintainers,
> LTP-users)
> 
> 3. Pre-release widely testing, we need to explicitly post results in step1
> email (Petr, Li Wang)
> 
> 4. Tiny fix according to pre-release testing result (All maintainers, users)
> 
> 5. Writing release note (Cyril)
> 
> 6. Uploading tarballs (Petr)
> 
> 7. Announcement email of LTP release (Cyril)
> 
> 
> Does this look useful? or anything else?

Thanks a lot for writing this down. Agree on all points, lets get to
work so that we actually manage to produce the release at the end of the
month.

-- 
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz

-- 
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp

  reply	other threads:[~2022-09-13 11:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-09  8:49 [LTP] September LTP release Cyril Hrubis
2022-09-09 10:39 ` Li Wang
2022-09-09 11:10   ` Cyril Hrubis
2022-09-09 14:36     ` Petr Vorel
2022-09-13  7:11       ` Li Wang
2022-09-13 11:50         ` Cyril Hrubis [this message]
2022-09-26  9:58         ` Cyril Hrubis
2022-09-26 10:13           ` Li Wang
2022-09-26 12:26             ` Petr Vorel
2022-09-27  7:44             ` Li Wang
2022-09-27  8:10               ` Petr Vorel
2022-09-27  8:25                 ` Li Wang
2022-09-30 14:00                   ` Petr Vorel
2022-09-26 10:43           ` Petr Vorel
2022-09-26 10:48           ` Petr Vorel
2022-09-09 14:56   ` Petr Vorel
2022-09-12  9:36     ` Cyril Hrubis
2022-09-12  9:45       ` Petr Vorel
2022-09-13  8:19 ` xuyang2018.jy
2022-09-13  9:23   ` Cyril Hrubis
2022-09-19 15:31 ` Petr Vorel
2022-09-23 11:01   ` Petr Vorel
2022-09-23 11:59     ` Cyril Hrubis
2022-09-23 12:16       ` Petr Vorel
2022-09-26  9:49         ` Cyril Hrubis
2022-09-30 10:05 ` Petr Vorel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YyBuhAed+rlLDYGd@yuki \
    --to=chrubis@suse.cz \
    --cc=automated-testing@lists.yoctoproject.org \
    --cc=liwang@redhat.com \
    --cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
    --cc=martin.doucha@suse.com \
    --cc=rpalethorpe@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.