All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Cc: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>,
	joro@8bytes.org, suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com, will@kernel.org,
	robin.murphy@arm.com, robdclark@gmail.com, dwmw2@infradead.org,
	baolu.lu@linux.intel.com, agross@kernel.org,
	bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, konrad.dybcio@somainline.org,
	matthias.bgg@gmail.com, heiko@sntech.de, orsonzhai@gmail.com,
	baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com, zhang.lyra@gmail.com,
	thierry.reding@gmail.com, sricharan@codeaurora.org,
	yong.wu@mediatek.com, vdumpa@nvidia.com, jonathanh@nvidia.com,
	tglx@linutronix.de, shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com,
	thunder.leizhen@huawei.com, christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr,
	yangyingliang@huawei.com, jon@solid-run.com,
	iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] iommu: Regulate errno in ->attach_dev callback functions
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2022 10:49:42 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YyGjtsB2Yq4fQICS@myrica> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YyGaqsXSDMn8R12R@nvidia.com>

On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 06:11:06AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 01:27:03PM +0100, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> > I think in the future it will be too easy to forget about the constrained
> > return value of attach() while modifying some other part of the driver,
> > and let an external helper return EINVAL. So I'd rather not propagate ret
> > from outside of viommu_domain_attach() and finalise().
> 
> Fortunately, if -EINVAL is wrongly returned it only creates an
> inefficiency, not a functional problem. So we do not need to be
> precise here.

Ah fair. In that case the attach_dev() documentation should indicate that
EINVAL is a hint, so that callers don't rely on it (currently words "must"
and "exclusively" indicate that returning EINVAL for anything other than
device-domain incompatibility is unacceptable). The virtio-iommu
implementation may well return EINVAL from the virtio stack or from the
host response.

Thanks,
Jean

> 
> > Since we can't guarantee that APIs like virtio or ida won't ever return
> > EINVAL, we should set all return values:
> 
> I dislike this alot, it squashes all return codes to try to optimize
> an obscure failure path :(
> 
> Jason

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Cc: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>,
	joro@8bytes.org, suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com, will@kernel.org,
	robin.murphy@arm.com, robdclark@gmail.com, dwmw2@infradead.org,
	baolu.lu@linux.intel.com, agross@kernel.org,
	bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, konrad.dybcio@somainline.org,
	matthias.bgg@gmail.com, heiko@sntech.de, orsonzhai@gmail.com,
	baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com, zhang.lyra@gmail.com,
	thierry.reding@gmail.com, sricharan@codeaurora.org,
	yong.wu@mediatek.com, vdumpa@nvidia.com, jonathanh@nvidia.com,
	tglx@linutronix.de, shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com,
	thunder.leizhen@huawei.com, christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr,
	yangyingliang@huawei.com, jon@solid-run.com,
	iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] iommu: Regulate errno in ->attach_dev callback functions
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2022 10:49:42 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YyGjtsB2Yq4fQICS@myrica> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YyGaqsXSDMn8R12R@nvidia.com>

On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 06:11:06AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 01:27:03PM +0100, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> > I think in the future it will be too easy to forget about the constrained
> > return value of attach() while modifying some other part of the driver,
> > and let an external helper return EINVAL. So I'd rather not propagate ret
> > from outside of viommu_domain_attach() and finalise().
> 
> Fortunately, if -EINVAL is wrongly returned it only creates an
> inefficiency, not a functional problem. So we do not need to be
> precise here.

Ah fair. In that case the attach_dev() documentation should indicate that
EINVAL is a hint, so that callers don't rely on it (currently words "must"
and "exclusively" indicate that returning EINVAL for anything other than
device-domain incompatibility is unacceptable). The virtio-iommu
implementation may well return EINVAL from the virtio stack or from the
host response.

Thanks,
Jean

> 
> > Since we can't guarantee that APIs like virtio or ida won't ever return
> > EINVAL, we should set all return values:
> 
> I dislike this alot, it squashes all return codes to try to optimize
> an obscure failure path :(
> 
> Jason

_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Cc: heiko@sntech.de, konrad.dybcio@somainline.org,
	bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org,
	thierry.reding@gmail.com, will@kernel.org, zhang.lyra@gmail.com,
	joro@8bytes.org, jon@solid-run.com, jonathanh@nvidia.com,
	linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev,
	agross@kernel.org, Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, yangyingliang@huawei.com,
	orsonzhai@gmail.com, dwmw2@infradead.org,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, vdumpa@nvidia.com,
	christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr, baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com,
	thunder.leizhen@huawei.com, matthias.bgg@gmail.com,
	tglx@linutronix.de, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	yong.wu@mediatek.com, robin.murphy@arm.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com, robdclark@gmail.com,
	suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, sricharan@codeaurora.org,
	baolu.lu@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] iommu: Regulate errno in ->attach_dev callback functions
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2022 10:49:42 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YyGjtsB2Yq4fQICS@myrica> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YyGaqsXSDMn8R12R@nvidia.com>

On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 06:11:06AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 01:27:03PM +0100, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> > I think in the future it will be too easy to forget about the constrained
> > return value of attach() while modifying some other part of the driver,
> > and let an external helper return EINVAL. So I'd rather not propagate ret
> > from outside of viommu_domain_attach() and finalise().
> 
> Fortunately, if -EINVAL is wrongly returned it only creates an
> inefficiency, not a functional problem. So we do not need to be
> precise here.

Ah fair. In that case the attach_dev() documentation should indicate that
EINVAL is a hint, so that callers don't rely on it (currently words "must"
and "exclusively" indicate that returning EINVAL for anything other than
device-domain incompatibility is unacceptable). The virtio-iommu
implementation may well return EINVAL from the virtio stack or from the
host response.

Thanks,
Jean

> 
> > Since we can't guarantee that APIs like virtio or ida won't ever return
> > EINVAL, we should set all return values:
> 
> I dislike this alot, it squashes all return codes to try to optimize
> an obscure failure path :(
> 
> Jason
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Cc: heiko@sntech.de, konrad.dybcio@somainline.org,
	bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org,
	thierry.reding@gmail.com, will@kernel.org, zhang.lyra@gmail.com,
	joro@8bytes.org, jon@solid-run.com, jonathanh@nvidia.com,
	linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev,
	agross@kernel.org, Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, yangyingliang@huawei.com,
	orsonzhai@gmail.com, dwmw2@infradead.org,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr,
	baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com, thunder.leizhen@huawei.com,
	matthias.bgg@gmail.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, yong.wu@mediatek.com,
	robin.murphy@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com, robdclark@gmail.com,
	suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, sricharan@codeaurora.org,
	baolu.lu@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] iommu: Regulate errno in ->attach_dev callback functions
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2022 10:49:42 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YyGjtsB2Yq4fQICS@myrica> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YyGaqsXSDMn8R12R@nvidia.com>

On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 06:11:06AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 01:27:03PM +0100, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> > I think in the future it will be too easy to forget about the constrained
> > return value of attach() while modifying some other part of the driver,
> > and let an external helper return EINVAL. So I'd rather not propagate ret
> > from outside of viommu_domain_attach() and finalise().
> 
> Fortunately, if -EINVAL is wrongly returned it only creates an
> inefficiency, not a functional problem. So we do not need to be
> precise here.

Ah fair. In that case the attach_dev() documentation should indicate that
EINVAL is a hint, so that callers don't rely on it (currently words "must"
and "exclusively" indicate that returning EINVAL for anything other than
device-domain incompatibility is unacceptable). The virtio-iommu
implementation may well return EINVAL from the virtio stack or from the
host response.

Thanks,
Jean

> 
> > Since we can't guarantee that APIs like virtio or ida won't ever return
> > EINVAL, we should set all return values:
> 
> I dislike this alot, it squashes all return codes to try to optimize
> an obscure failure path :(
> 
> Jason

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2022-09-14  9:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-13  8:24 [PATCH 0/5] iommu: Define EINVAL as device/domain incompatibility Nicolin Chen
2022-09-13  8:24 ` Nicolin Chen
2022-09-13  8:24 ` Nicolin Chen
2022-09-13  8:24 ` [PATCH 1/5] iommu/msm: Add missing __disable_clocks calls Nicolin Chen
2022-09-13  8:24   ` Nicolin Chen
2022-09-13  8:24   ` Nicolin Chen
2022-09-13  8:24 ` [PATCH 2/5] iommu/amd: Drop unnecessary checks in amd_iommu_attach_device() Nicolin Chen
2022-09-13  8:24   ` Nicolin Chen
2022-09-13  8:24   ` Nicolin Chen
2022-09-13  8:24 ` [PATCH 3/5] iommu: Add return errno rules to ->attach_dev ops Nicolin Chen
2022-09-13  8:24   ` Nicolin Chen
2022-09-13  8:24   ` Nicolin Chen
2022-09-13 18:41   ` Jeff Johnson
2022-09-13 18:41     ` Jeff Johnson
2022-09-13 18:41     ` Jeff Johnson
2022-09-13 20:00     ` Nicolin Chen
2022-09-13 20:00       ` Nicolin Chen
2022-09-13 20:00       ` Nicolin Chen
2022-09-13  8:24 ` [PATCH 4/5] iommu: Regulate errno in ->attach_dev callback functions Nicolin Chen
2022-09-13  8:24   ` Nicolin Chen
2022-09-13  8:24   ` Nicolin Chen
2022-09-13 12:27   ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2022-09-13 12:27     ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2022-09-13 12:27     ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2022-09-13 12:27     ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2022-09-13 20:14     ` Nicolin Chen
2022-09-13 20:14       ` Nicolin Chen
2022-09-13 20:14       ` Nicolin Chen
2022-09-14  9:11     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-09-14  9:11       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-09-14  9:11       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-09-14  9:49       ` Jean-Philippe Brucker [this message]
2022-09-14  9:49         ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2022-09-14  9:49         ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2022-09-14  9:49         ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2022-09-14 17:58         ` Nicolin Chen
2022-09-14 17:58           ` Nicolin Chen
2022-09-14 17:58           ` Nicolin Chen
2022-09-14 19:53           ` Robin Murphy
2022-09-14 19:53             ` Robin Murphy
2022-09-14 19:53             ` Robin Murphy
2022-09-14 19:53             ` Robin Murphy
2022-09-14 20:55             ` Nicolin Chen
2022-09-14 20:55               ` Nicolin Chen
2022-09-14 20:55               ` Nicolin Chen
2022-09-13  8:24 ` [PATCH 5/5] iommu: Use EINVAL for incompatible device/domain in ->attach_dev Nicolin Chen
2022-09-13  8:24   ` Nicolin Chen
2022-09-13  8:24   ` Nicolin Chen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YyGjtsB2Yq4fQICS@myrica \
    --to=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
    --cc=agross@kernel.org \
    --cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
    --cc=christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=jon@solid-run.com \
    --cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=konrad.dybcio@somainline.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
    --cc=orsonzhai@gmail.com \
    --cc=robdclark@gmail.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \
    --cc=sricharan@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    --cc=thunder.leizhen@huawei.com \
    --cc=vdumpa@nvidia.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yangyingliang@huawei.com \
    --cc=yong.wu@mediatek.com \
    --cc=zhang.lyra@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.