From: "Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)" <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org
Subject: build failure of next-20220919 due to c0357a73fa4a ("arm64/sysreg: Align field names in ID_AA64DFR0_EL1 with architecture")
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2022 13:43:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yyhj+gqfS6mdRnGv@debian> (raw)
Hi All,
The builds of arm64 allmodconfig have failed to build next-20220919
with the error:
drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c: In function 'arm_spe_pmsevfr_res0':
drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c:679:14: error: 'ID_AA64DFR0_PMSVER_8_2' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMSVer_IMP'?
679 | case ID_AA64DFR0_PMSVER_8_2:
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMSVer_IMP
drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c:679:14: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c:681:14: error: 'ID_AA64DFR0_PMSVER_8_3' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMSVer_IMP'?
681 | case ID_AA64DFR0_PMSVER_8_3:
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMSVer_IMP
drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c: In function '__arm_spe_pmu_dev_probe':
drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c:963:52: error: 'ID_AA64DFR0_PMSVER_SHIFT' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMSVer_SHIFT'?
963 | ID_AA64DFR0_PMSVER_SHIFT);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMSVer_SHIFT
git bisect pointed to c0357a73fa4a ("arm64/sysreg: Align field names in ID_AA64DFR0_EL1 with architecture").
I will be happy to test any patch or provide any extra log if needed.
--
Regards
Sudip
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)" <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org
Subject: build failure of next-20220919 due to c0357a73fa4a ("arm64/sysreg: Align field names in ID_AA64DFR0_EL1 with architecture")
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2022 13:43:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yyhj+gqfS6mdRnGv@debian> (raw)
Hi All,
The builds of arm64 allmodconfig have failed to build next-20220919
with the error:
drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c: In function 'arm_spe_pmsevfr_res0':
drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c:679:14: error: 'ID_AA64DFR0_PMSVER_8_2' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMSVer_IMP'?
679 | case ID_AA64DFR0_PMSVER_8_2:
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMSVer_IMP
drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c:679:14: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c:681:14: error: 'ID_AA64DFR0_PMSVER_8_3' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMSVer_IMP'?
681 | case ID_AA64DFR0_PMSVER_8_3:
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMSVer_IMP
drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c: In function '__arm_spe_pmu_dev_probe':
drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c:963:52: error: 'ID_AA64DFR0_PMSVER_SHIFT' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMSVer_SHIFT'?
963 | ID_AA64DFR0_PMSVER_SHIFT);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMSVer_SHIFT
git bisect pointed to c0357a73fa4a ("arm64/sysreg: Align field names in ID_AA64DFR0_EL1 with architecture").
I will be happy to test any patch or provide any extra log if needed.
--
Regards
Sudip
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next reply other threads:[~2022-09-19 12:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-19 12:43 Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink) [this message]
2022-09-19 12:43 ` build failure of next-20220919 due to c0357a73fa4a ("arm64/sysreg: Align field names in ID_AA64DFR0_EL1 with architecture") Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Yyhj+gqfS6mdRnGv@debian \
--to=sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.