From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Daniil Lunev <dlunev@google.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
Sarthak Kukreti <sarthakkukreti@chromium.org>,
"Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@google.com>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@google.com>,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
dm-devel@redhat.com, Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Evan Green <evgreen@google.com>,
Alasdair Kergon <agk@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH RFC 0/8] Introduce provisioning primitives for thinly provisioned storage
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2022 04:30:16 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YymkSDsFVVg1nbDP@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAKderPF5Z5QLxyEb80Y+90+eR0sfRmL-WfgXLp=eL=HxWSZ9g@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 08:17:10PM +1000, Daniil Lunev wrote:
> to WRITE ZERO command in NVMe, but to WRITE UNAVAILABLE in
There is no such thing as WRITE UNAVAILABLE in NVMe.
> NVME 2.0 spec, and to UNMAP ANCHORED in SCSI spec.
The SCSI anchored LBA state is quite complicated, and in addition
to UNMAP you can also create it using WRITE SAME, which is at least
partially useful, as it allows for sensible initialization pattern.
For the purpose of Linux that woud be 0.
That being siad you still haven't actually explained what problem
you're even trying to solve.
--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Daniil Lunev <dlunev@google.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Sarthak Kukreti <sarthakkukreti@chromium.org>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
dm-devel@redhat.com, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
"Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Alasdair Kergon <agk@redhat.com>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@kernel.org>, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@google.com>,
Evan Green <evgreen@google.com>,
Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/8] Introduce provisioning primitives for thinly provisioned storage
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2022 04:30:16 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YymkSDsFVVg1nbDP@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAKderPF5Z5QLxyEb80Y+90+eR0sfRmL-WfgXLp=eL=HxWSZ9g@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 08:17:10PM +1000, Daniil Lunev wrote:
> to WRITE ZERO command in NVMe, but to WRITE UNAVAILABLE in
There is no such thing as WRITE UNAVAILABLE in NVMe.
> NVME 2.0 spec, and to UNMAP ANCHORED in SCSI spec.
The SCSI anchored LBA state is quite complicated, and in addition
to UNMAP you can also create it using WRITE SAME, which is at least
partially useful, as it allows for sensible initialization pattern.
For the purpose of Linux that woud be 0.
That being siad you still haven't actually explained what problem
you're even trying to solve.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Daniil Lunev <dlunev@google.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
Sarthak Kukreti <sarthakkukreti@chromium.org>,
"Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@google.com>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@google.com>,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
dm-devel@redhat.com, Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Evan Green <evgreen@google.com>,
Alasdair Kergon <agk@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/8] Introduce provisioning primitives for thinly provisioned storage
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2022 04:30:16 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YymkSDsFVVg1nbDP@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAKderPF5Z5QLxyEb80Y+90+eR0sfRmL-WfgXLp=eL=HxWSZ9g@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 08:17:10PM +1000, Daniil Lunev wrote:
> to WRITE ZERO command in NVMe, but to WRITE UNAVAILABLE in
There is no such thing as WRITE UNAVAILABLE in NVMe.
> NVME 2.0 spec, and to UNMAP ANCHORED in SCSI spec.
The SCSI anchored LBA state is quite complicated, and in addition
to UNMAP you can also create it using WRITE SAME, which is at least
partially useful, as it allows for sensible initialization pattern.
For the purpose of Linux that woud be 0.
That being siad you still haven't actually explained what problem
you're even trying to solve.
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-20 11:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 102+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-15 16:48 [dm-devel] [PATCH RFC 0/8] Introduce provisioning primitives for thinly provisioned storage Sarthak Kukreti
2022-09-15 16:48 ` Sarthak Kukreti
2022-09-15 16:48 ` [dm-devel] [PATCH RFC 1/8] block: Introduce provisioning primitives Sarthak Kukreti
2022-09-15 16:48 ` Sarthak Kukreti
2022-09-23 15:15 ` [dm-devel] " Mike Snitzer
2022-09-23 15:15 ` Mike Snitzer
2022-09-23 15:15 ` Mike Snitzer
2022-12-29 8:17 ` [dm-devel] " Sarthak Kukreti
2022-12-29 8:17 ` Sarthak Kukreti
2022-09-15 16:48 ` [dm-devel] [PATCH RFC 2/8] dm: Add support for block provisioning Sarthak Kukreti
2022-09-15 16:48 ` Sarthak Kukreti
2022-09-23 14:23 ` [dm-devel] " Mike Snitzer
2022-09-23 14:23 ` Mike Snitzer
2022-09-23 14:23 ` Mike Snitzer
2022-12-29 8:22 ` [dm-devel] " Sarthak Kukreti
2022-12-29 8:22 ` Sarthak Kukreti
2022-09-15 16:48 ` [dm-devel] [PATCH RFC 3/8] virtio_blk: Add support for provision requests Sarthak Kukreti
2022-09-15 16:48 ` Sarthak Kukreti
2022-09-16 5:48 ` [dm-devel] " Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-09-16 5:48 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-09-16 5:48 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-09-20 2:33 ` [dm-devel] " Sarthak Kukreti
2022-09-20 2:33 ` Sarthak Kukreti
2022-09-27 21:37 ` [dm-devel] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-09-27 21:37 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-09-27 21:37 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-09-15 16:48 ` [dm-devel] [PATCH RFC 4/8] fs: Introduce FALLOC_FL_PROVISION Sarthak Kukreti
2022-09-15 16:48 ` Sarthak Kukreti
2022-09-16 11:56 ` [dm-devel] " Brian Foster
2022-09-16 11:56 ` Brian Foster
2022-09-16 11:56 ` Brian Foster
2022-09-16 21:02 ` [dm-devel] " Sarthak Kukreti
2022-09-16 21:02 ` Sarthak Kukreti
2022-09-21 15:39 ` [dm-devel] " Brian Foster
2022-09-21 15:39 ` Brian Foster
2022-09-21 15:39 ` Brian Foster
2022-09-22 8:04 ` [dm-devel] " Sarthak Kukreti
2022-09-22 8:04 ` Sarthak Kukreti
2022-09-22 18:29 ` [dm-devel] " Brian Foster
2022-09-22 18:29 ` Brian Foster
2022-09-22 18:29 ` Brian Foster
2022-12-29 8:13 ` [dm-devel] " Sarthak Kukreti
2022-12-29 8:13 ` Sarthak Kukreti
2022-09-20 7:49 ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2022-09-20 7:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-09-20 7:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-09-21 5:54 ` [dm-devel] " Sarthak Kukreti
2022-09-21 5:54 ` Sarthak Kukreti
2022-09-21 15:21 ` [dm-devel] " Mike Snitzer
2022-09-21 15:21 ` Mike Snitzer
2022-09-21 15:21 ` Mike Snitzer
2022-09-22 8:08 ` [dm-devel] " Sarthak Kukreti
2022-09-22 8:08 ` Sarthak Kukreti
2022-09-23 8:45 ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2022-09-23 8:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-09-23 8:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-12-29 8:14 ` [dm-devel] " Sarthak Kukreti
2022-12-29 8:14 ` Sarthak Kukreti
2022-09-15 16:48 ` [dm-devel] [PATCH RFC 5/8] loop: Add support for provision requests Sarthak Kukreti
2022-09-15 16:48 ` Sarthak Kukreti
2022-09-15 16:48 ` [dm-devel] [PATCH RFC 6/8] ext4: Add support for FALLOC_FL_PROVISION Sarthak Kukreti
2022-09-15 16:48 ` Sarthak Kukreti
2022-09-15 16:48 ` [dm-devel] [PATCH RFC 7/8] ext4: Add mount option for provisioning blocks during allocations Sarthak Kukreti
2022-09-15 16:48 ` Sarthak Kukreti
2022-09-15 16:48 ` [dm-devel] [PATCH RFC 8/8] ext4: Add a per-file provision override xattr Sarthak Kukreti
2022-09-15 16:48 ` Sarthak Kukreti
2022-09-16 6:09 ` [dm-devel] [PATCH RFC 0/8] Introduce provisioning primitives for thinly provisioned storage Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-09-16 6:09 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-09-16 6:09 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-09-16 18:48 ` [dm-devel] " Sarthak Kukreti
2022-09-16 18:48 ` Sarthak Kukreti
2022-09-16 20:01 ` [dm-devel] " Bart Van Assche
2022-09-16 20:01 ` Bart Van Assche
2022-09-16 20:01 ` Bart Van Assche
2022-09-16 21:59 ` [dm-devel] " Sarthak Kukreti
2022-09-16 21:59 ` Sarthak Kukreti
2022-09-20 7:46 ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2022-09-20 7:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-09-20 7:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-09-20 10:17 ` [dm-devel] " Daniil Lunev
2022-09-20 11:30 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2022-09-20 11:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-09-20 11:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-09-20 21:48 ` [dm-devel] " Daniil Lunev
2022-09-21 15:08 ` Mike Snitzer
2022-09-21 15:08 ` Mike Snitzer
2022-09-21 15:08 ` Mike Snitzer
2022-09-23 8:51 ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2022-09-23 8:51 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-09-23 8:51 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-09-23 14:08 ` [dm-devel] " Mike Snitzer
2022-09-23 14:08 ` Mike Snitzer
2022-09-23 14:08 ` Mike Snitzer
2022-12-29 8:17 ` [dm-devel] " Sarthak Kukreti
2022-12-29 8:17 ` Sarthak Kukreti
2022-09-17 3:03 ` [dm-devel] " Darrick J. Wong
2022-09-17 3:03 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-09-17 19:46 ` Sarthak Kukreti
2022-09-17 19:46 ` Sarthak Kukreti
2022-09-19 16:36 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-09-19 16:36 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-09-19 16:36 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YymkSDsFVVg1nbDP@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=agk@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bvanassche@google.com \
--cc=dlunev@google.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=evgreen@google.com \
--cc=gwendal@google.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=sarthakkukreti@chromium.org \
--cc=snitzer@kernel.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.