From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: jolsa@kernel.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com, rnsastry@linux.ibm.com,
kjain@linux.ibm.com, disgoel@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/3] tools/perf/tests: Fix branch stack sampling test to include sanity check for branch filter
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2022 11:29:44 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YzRaWCpWkEMV3HqS@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220921145255.20972-2-atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Em Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 08:22:54PM +0530, Athira Rajeev escreveu:
> commit b55878c90ab9 ("perf test: Add test for branch stack sampling")
> added test for branch stack sampling. There is a sanity check in the
> beginning to skip the test if the hardware doesn't support branch stack
> sampling.
>
> Snippet
> <<>>
> skip the test if the hardware doesn't support branch stack sampling
> perf record -b -o- -B true > /dev/null 2>&1 || exit 2
> <<>>
>
> But the testcase also uses branch sample types: save_type, any. if any
> platform doesn't support the branch filters used in the test, the testcase
> will fail. In powerpc, currently mutliple branch filters are not supported
> and hence this test fails in powerpc. Fix the sanity check to look at
> the support for branch filters used in this test before proceeding with
>> the test.
Applied the tools/perf/ part
- Arnaldo
> Fixes: b55878c90ab9 ("perf test: Add test for branch stack sampling")
> Reported-by: Disha Goel <disgoel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Kajol Jain <kjain@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> tools/perf/tests/shell/test_brstack.sh | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_brstack.sh b/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_brstack.sh
> index c644f94a6500..ec801cffae6b 100755
> --- a/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_brstack.sh
> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_brstack.sh
> @@ -12,7 +12,8 @@ if ! [ -x "$(command -v cc)" ]; then
> fi
>
> # skip the test if the hardware doesn't support branch stack sampling
> -perf record -b -o- -B true > /dev/null 2>&1 || exit 2
> +# and if the architecture doesn't support filter types: any,save_type,u
> +perf record -b -o- -B --branch-filter any,save_type,u true > /dev/null 2>&1 || exit 2
>
> TMPDIR=$(mktemp -d /tmp/__perf_test.program.XXXXX)
>
> --
> 2.31.1
--
- Arnaldo
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com, rnsastry@linux.ibm.com,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, jolsa@kernel.org,
kjain@linux.ibm.com, disgoel@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/3] tools/perf/tests: Fix branch stack sampling test to include sanity check for branch filter
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2022 11:29:44 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YzRaWCpWkEMV3HqS@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220921145255.20972-2-atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Em Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 08:22:54PM +0530, Athira Rajeev escreveu:
> commit b55878c90ab9 ("perf test: Add test for branch stack sampling")
> added test for branch stack sampling. There is a sanity check in the
> beginning to skip the test if the hardware doesn't support branch stack
> sampling.
>
> Snippet
> <<>>
> skip the test if the hardware doesn't support branch stack sampling
> perf record -b -o- -B true > /dev/null 2>&1 || exit 2
> <<>>
>
> But the testcase also uses branch sample types: save_type, any. if any
> platform doesn't support the branch filters used in the test, the testcase
> will fail. In powerpc, currently mutliple branch filters are not supported
> and hence this test fails in powerpc. Fix the sanity check to look at
> the support for branch filters used in this test before proceeding with
>> the test.
Applied the tools/perf/ part
- Arnaldo
> Fixes: b55878c90ab9 ("perf test: Add test for branch stack sampling")
> Reported-by: Disha Goel <disgoel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Kajol Jain <kjain@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> tools/perf/tests/shell/test_brstack.sh | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_brstack.sh b/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_brstack.sh
> index c644f94a6500..ec801cffae6b 100755
> --- a/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_brstack.sh
> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_brstack.sh
> @@ -12,7 +12,8 @@ if ! [ -x "$(command -v cc)" ]; then
> fi
>
> # skip the test if the hardware doesn't support branch stack sampling
> -perf record -b -o- -B true > /dev/null 2>&1 || exit 2
> +# and if the architecture doesn't support filter types: any,save_type,u
> +perf record -b -o- -B --branch-filter any,save_type,u true > /dev/null 2>&1 || exit 2
>
> TMPDIR=$(mktemp -d /tmp/__perf_test.program.XXXXX)
>
> --
> 2.31.1
--
- Arnaldo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-28 14:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-21 14:52 [PATCH V2 1/3] powerpc/perf: Fix branch_filter support for multiple filters in powerpc Athira Rajeev
2022-09-21 14:52 ` Athira Rajeev
2022-09-21 14:52 ` [PATCH V2 2/3] tools/perf/tests: Fix branch stack sampling test to include sanity check for branch filter Athira Rajeev
2022-09-21 14:52 ` Athira Rajeev
2022-09-28 14:27 ` Athira Rajeev
2022-09-28 14:29 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2022-09-28 14:29 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2022-09-29 5:35 ` Michael Ellerman
2022-09-29 5:35 ` Michael Ellerman
2022-09-21 14:52 ` [PATCH V2 3/3] tools/testing/selftests/powerpc: Update the bhrb filter sampling test to test for multiple branch filters Athira Rajeev
2022-09-21 14:52 ` Athira Rajeev
2022-10-04 13:25 ` (subset) [PATCH V2 1/3] powerpc/perf: Fix branch_filter support for multiple filters in powerpc Michael Ellerman
2022-10-04 13:25 ` Michael Ellerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YzRaWCpWkEMV3HqS@kernel.org \
--to=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=disgoel@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kjain@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=rnsastry@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.