Re: [PATCH v7 2/3] clk: thead: Add clock support for VO subsystem in T-HEAD TH1520 SoC

From: Drew Fustini <drew@pdp7.com>
To: Michal Wilczynski <m.wilczynski@samsung.com>
Cc: mturquette@baylibre.com, sboyd@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org,
	krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, guoren@kernel.org,
	wefu@redhat.com, paul.walmsley@sifive.com, palmer@dabbelt.com,
	aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, alex@ghiti.fr, jszhang@kernel.org,
	p.zabel@pengutronix.de, m.szyprowski@samsung.com,
	linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/3] clk: thead: Add clock support for VO subsystem in T-HEAD TH1520 SoC
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2025 17:40:19 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z/B78yemvvSS1oLe@x1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250403094425.876981-3-m.wilczynski@samsung.com>

On Thu, Apr 03, 2025 at 11:44:24AM +0200, Michal Wilczynski wrote:
> The T-Head TH1520 SoC integrates a variety of clocks for its subsystems,
> including the Application Processor (AP) and the Video Output (VO) [1].
> Up until now, the T-Head clock driver only supported AP clocks.
> 
> Extend the driver to provide clock functionality for the VO subsystem.
> At this stage, the focus is on implementing the VO clock gates, as these
> are currently the most relevant and required components for enabling and
> disabling the VO subsystem functionality.  Future enhancements may
> introduce additional VO-related clocks as necessary.
> 
> Link: https://openbeagle.org/beaglev-ahead/beaglev-ahead/-/blob/main/docs/TH1520%20System%20User%20Manual.pdf [1]
> 
> Signed-off-by: Michal Wilczynski <m.wilczynski@samsung.com>
> ---
>  drivers/clk/thead/clk-th1520-ap.c | 196 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 168 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/thead/clk-th1520-ap.c b/drivers/clk/thead/clk-th1520-ap.c
> index 4c9555fc6184..ebfb1d59401d 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/thead/clk-th1520-ap.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/thead/clk-th1520-ap.c
> @@ -847,6 +847,67 @@ static CCU_GATE(CLK_SRAM1, sram1_clk, "sram1", axi_aclk_pd, 0x20c, BIT(3), 0);
>  static CCU_GATE(CLK_SRAM2, sram2_clk, "sram2", axi_aclk_pd, 0x20c, BIT(2), 0);
>  static CCU_GATE(CLK_SRAM3, sram3_clk, "sram3", axi_aclk_pd, 0x20c, BIT(1), 0);
>  
> +static CCU_GATE(CLK_AXI4_VO_ACLK, axi4_vo_aclk, "axi4-vo-aclk",
> +		video_pll_clk_pd, 0x0, BIT(0), 0);

Is CLKCTRL_GPU_MEM_CLK_EN (bit 2) skipped on purpose?

> +static CCU_GATE(CLK_GPU_CORE, gpu_core_clk, "gpu-core-clk", video_pll_clk_pd,
> +		0x0, BIT(3), 0);
> +static CCU_GATE(CLK_GPU_CFG_ACLK, gpu_cfg_aclk, "gpu-cfg-aclk",
> +		video_pll_clk_pd, 0x0, BIT(4), 0);
> +static CCU_GATE(CLK_DPU_PIXELCLK0, dpu0_pixelclk, "dpu0-pixelclk",
> +		video_pll_clk_pd, 0x0, BIT(5), 0);
> +static CCU_GATE(CLK_DPU_PIXELCLK1, dpu1_pixelclk, "dpu1-pixelclk",
> +		video_pll_clk_pd, 0x0, BIT(6), 0);
> +static CCU_GATE(CLK_DPU_HCLK, dpu_hclk, "dpu-hclk", video_pll_clk_pd, 0x0,
> +		BIT(7), 0);
> +static CCU_GATE(CLK_DPU_ACLK, dpu_aclk, "dpu-aclk", video_pll_clk_pd, 0x0,
> +		BIT(8), 0);
> +static CCU_GATE(CLK_DPU_CCLK, dpu_cclk, "dpu-cclk", video_pll_clk_pd, 0x0,
> +		BIT(9), 0);
> +static CCU_GATE(CLK_HDMI_SFR, hdmi_sfr_clk, "hdmi-sfr-clk", video_pll_clk_pd,
> +		0x0, BIT(10), 0);
> +static CCU_GATE(CLK_HDMI_PCLK, hdmi_pclk, "hdmi-pclk", video_pll_clk_pd, 0x0,
> +		BIT(11), 0);
> +static CCU_GATE(CLK_HDMI_CEC, hdmi_cec_clk, "hdmi-cec-clk", video_pll_clk_pd,
> +		0x0, BIT(12), 0);
> +static CCU_GATE(CLK_MIPI_DSI0_PCLK, mipi_dsi0_pclk, "mipi-dsi0-pclk",
> +		video_pll_clk_pd, 0x0, BIT(13), 0);
> +static CCU_GATE(CLK_MIPI_DSI1_PCLK, mipi_dsi1_pclk, "mipi-dsi1-pclk",
> +		video_pll_clk_pd, 0x0, BIT(14), 0);
> +static CCU_GATE(CLK_MIPI_DSI0_CFG, mipi_dsi0_cfg_clk, "mipi-dsi0-cfg-clk",
> +		video_pll_clk_pd, 0x0, BIT(15), 0);
> +static CCU_GATE(CLK_MIPI_DSI1_CFG, mipi_dsi1_cfg_clk, "mipi-dsi1-cfg-clk",
> +		video_pll_clk_pd, 0x0, BIT(16), 0);
> +static CCU_GATE(CLK_MIPI_DSI0_REFCLK, mipi_dsi0_refclk, "mipi-dsi0-refclk",
> +		video_pll_clk_pd, 0x0, BIT(17), 0);
> +static CCU_GATE(CLK_MIPI_DSI1_REFCLK, mipi_dsi1_refclk, "mipi-dsi1-refclk",
> +		video_pll_clk_pd, 0x0, BIT(18), 0);
> +static CCU_GATE(CLK_HDMI_I2S, hdmi_i2s_clk, "hdmi-i2s-clk", video_pll_clk_pd,
> +		0x0, BIT(19), 0);
> +static CCU_GATE(CLK_X2H_DPU1_ACLK, x2h_dpu1_aclk, "x2h-dpu1-aclk",
> +		video_pll_clk_pd, 0x0, BIT(20), 0);
> +static CCU_GATE(CLK_X2H_DPU_ACLK, x2h_dpu_aclk, "x2h-dpu-aclk",
> +		video_pll_clk_pd, 0x0, BIT(21), 0);
> +static CCU_GATE(CLK_AXI4_VO_PCLK, axi4_vo_pclk, "axi4-vo-pclk",
> +		video_pll_clk_pd, 0x0, BIT(22), 0);
> +static CCU_GATE(CLK_IOPMP_VOSYS_DPU_PCLK, iopmp_vosys_dpu_pclk,
> +		"iopmp-vosys-dpu-pclk", video_pll_clk_pd, 0x0, BIT(23), 0);
> +static CCU_GATE(CLK_IOPMP_VOSYS_DPU1_PCLK, iopmp_vosys_dpu1_pclk,
> +		"iopmp-vosys-dpu1-pclk", video_pll_clk_pd, 0x0, BIT(24), 0);
> +static CCU_GATE(CLK_IOPMP_VOSYS_GPU_PCLK, iopmp_vosys_gpu_pclk,
> +		"iopmp-vosys-gpu-pclk", video_pll_clk_pd, 0x0, BIT(25), 0);
> +static CCU_GATE(CLK_IOPMP_DPU1_ACLK, iopmp_dpu1_aclk, "iopmp-dpu1-aclk",
> +		video_pll_clk_pd, 0x0, BIT(27), 0);
> +static CCU_GATE(CLK_IOPMP_DPU_ACLK, iopmp_dpu_aclk, "iopmp-dpu-aclk",
> +		video_pll_clk_pd, 0x0, BIT(28), 0);
> +static CCU_GATE(CLK_IOPMP_GPU_ACLK, iopmp_gpu_aclk, "iopmp-gpu-aclk",
> +		video_pll_clk_pd, 0x0, BIT(29), 0);
> +static CCU_GATE(CLK_MIPIDSI0_PIXCLK, mipi_dsi0_pixclk, "mipi-dsi0-pixclk",
> +		video_pll_clk_pd, 0x0, BIT(30), 0);
> +static CCU_GATE(CLK_MIPIDSI1_PIXCLK, mipi_dsi1_pixclk, "mipi-dsi1-pixclk",
> +		video_pll_clk_pd, 0x0, BIT(31), 0);
> +static CCU_GATE(CLK_HDMI_PIXCLK, hdmi_pixclk, "hdmi-pixclk", video_pll_clk_pd,
> +		0x4, BIT(0), 0);

Did you intentionally skip VOSYS_DPU_CCLK_CFG.VOSYS_DPU_CCLK_CFG and
TEST_CLK_CFG.TEST_CLK_CFG as they aren't needed?

Thanks,
Drew