From: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
To: Andrea Cervesato <andrea.cervesato@suse.com>
Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: Re: [LTP] [RFC][PATCH 0/2] Merge runtest files
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2025 17:47:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z-6tnZLIQvY3IIbb@yuki.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0045063b-ae7f-4dd6-9b8e-9d760713ea3b@suse.com>
Hi!
> this is a _huge_ topic that might affect LTP automation configurations.
>
> It's a job that IMHO should be done, but it makes more sense to wait for
> testing suites definition in metadata, as well as a total refactoring of
> old LTP tests.
For a bigger changes yes. I would say that eliminating runtest files
with a single test could be done sooner.
> The reason of my statements is not only that runtest files should be
> removed one day, but also that known issues inside products which are
> tested, often require years of analysis of the runtest files and their
> executions. By shuffling tests around will create issues where there's
> no need due to a small logical improvement.
I do not think that it's as severe as you describe it. We change runtest
files a lot in each release and additions to runtest/syscall are the most
frequent.
> I think we should start to push more on testing suites definition inside
> metadata and to refactor tests as fast as possible. So we will be free
> from runtest files, leading to a more coherent structure of the tests
> organization.
We are getting there slowly, but I'm afraid that it will take years to
get there.
--
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz
--
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-03 15:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-03 10:19 [LTP] [RFC][PATCH 0/2] Merge runtest files Petr Vorel
2025-04-03 10:19 ` [LTP] [RFC][PATCH 1/2] runtest/ipc: Enable named pipes on non-blocking IO Petr Vorel
2025-04-06 2:55 ` Li Wang via ltp
2025-04-08 18:37 ` Cyril Hrubis
2025-04-03 10:19 ` [LTP] [RFC][PATCH 2/2] runtest: Move ipc into syscalls Petr Vorel
2025-04-06 3:01 ` Li Wang via ltp
2025-04-07 12:15 ` Petr Vorel
2025-04-07 12:19 ` Petr Vorel
2025-04-17 9:22 ` Cyril Hrubis
2025-04-17 11:14 ` Petr Vorel
2025-04-03 11:33 ` [LTP] [RFC][PATCH 0/2] Merge runtest files Andrea Cervesato via ltp
2025-04-03 15:47 ` Cyril Hrubis [this message]
2025-04-06 2:52 ` Li Wang via ltp
2025-04-06 2:43 ` Li Wang via ltp
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z-6tnZLIQvY3IIbb@yuki.lan \
--to=chrubis@suse.cz \
--cc=andrea.cervesato@suse.com \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.