All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy@kernel.org>
To: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Cc: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>,
	Nick Desaulniers <nick.desaulniers+lkml@gmail.com>,
	Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com>,
	Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org,
	llvm@lists.linux.dev, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 2/2] wcslen() prototype in string.h
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2025 18:17:34 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z-LXHssrcpdtFqqn@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250325-string-add-wcslen-for-llvm-opt-v1-2-b8f1e2c17888@kernel.org>

On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 08:45:19AM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> If this is desired, it should be squashed into the previous change. I
> wrote it separately because it is slightly more invasive.
> 
> In order to export wcslen() to the rest of the kernel (should it ever be
> necessary elsewhere), it needs to be added to string.h, along with nls.h
> for the typedef of wchar_t. However, dragging in nls.h into string.h
> causes an error in the efistub due to a conflicting function name:
> 
>   drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/printk.c:27:5: error: static declaration of 'utf8_to_utf32' follows non-static declaration
>      27 | u32 utf8_to_utf32(const u8 **s8)
>         |     ^
>   include/linux/nls.h:55:12: note: previous declaration is here
>      55 | extern int utf8_to_utf32(const u8 *s, int len, unicode_t *pu);
>         |            ^
>   drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/printk.c:85:26: error: too few arguments to function call, expected 3, have 1
>      85 |                 c32 = utf8_to_utf32(&s8);
>         |                       ~~~~~~~~~~~~~    ^
>   include/linux/nls.h:55:12: note: 'utf8_to_utf32' declared here
>      55 | extern int utf8_to_utf32(const u8 *s, int len, unicode_t *pu);
>         |            ^             ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>   2 errors generated.
> 
> Rename the efi function to avoid the conflict.

Hmm... Why not split this to two, rename patch as a standalone makes sense to
me even outside of this series.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko



  reply	other threads:[~2025-03-25 16:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-25 15:45 [PATCH 0/2] string.c: Add wcslen() Nathan Chancellor
2025-03-25 15:45 ` [PATCH 1/2] lib/string.c: " Nathan Chancellor
2025-03-25 15:45 ` [PATCH RFC 2/2] wcslen() prototype in string.h Nathan Chancellor
2025-03-25 16:17   ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2025-03-25 16:58     ` Nathan Chancellor
2025-03-25 17:05       ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-03-25 21:45         ` Nathan Chancellor
2025-03-26  0:33           ` Nathan Chancellor
2025-03-26  8:59             ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-03-26 15:37               ` Nathan Chancellor
2025-03-26 15:43                 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-03-26  8:52           ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-03-25 23:55   ` kernel test robot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z-LXHssrcpdtFqqn@smile.fi.intel.com \
    --to=andy@kernel.org \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=justinstitt@google.com \
    --cc=kees@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=morbo@google.com \
    --cc=nathan@kernel.org \
    --cc=nick.desaulniers+lkml@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.