All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jaegeuk Kim via Linux-f2fs-devel <linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
To: Yi Sun <yi.sun@unisoc.com>
Cc: ke.wang@unisoc.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, sunyibuaa@gmail.com,
	Hao_hao.Wang@unisoc.com
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v3 3/5] f2fs: introduce update_sit_entry_for_release()
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2024 21:22:08 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z2XgAMRm6uMAT2XM@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241104034545.497907-4-yi.sun@unisoc.com>

This makes the code being inconsistent. Can you refactor first and add the loop
later separately?

For example,
1) add two functions, update_sit_entry_for_alloc() and update_sit_entry_for_release()
2) add a loop in update_sit_entry_for_release()

Thanks,

On 11/04, Yi Sun wrote:
> This function can process some consecutive blocks at a time.
> 
> When using update_sit_entry() to release consecutive blocks,
> ensure that the consecutive blocks belong to the same segment.
> Because after update_sit_entry_for_realese(), @segno is still
> in use in update_sit_entry().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yi Sun <yi.sun@unisoc.com>
> ---
>  fs/f2fs/segment.c | 103 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
>  1 file changed, 68 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> index 5386ae18d808..843171ce414b 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> @@ -2424,6 +2424,70 @@ static void update_segment_mtime(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, block_t blkaddr,
>  		SIT_I(sbi)->max_mtime = ctime;
>  }
>  
> +/*
> + * NOTE: when updating multiple blocks at the same time, please ensure
> + * that the consecutive input blocks belong to the same segment.
> + */
> +
> +static int update_sit_entry_for_release(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct seg_entry *se,
> +				block_t blkaddr, unsigned int offset, int del)
> +{
> +	bool exist;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_F2FS_CHECK_FS
> +	bool mir_exist;
> +#endif
> +	int i;
> +	int del_count = -del;
> +
> +	f2fs_bug_on(sbi, GET_SEGNO(sbi, blkaddr) != GET_SEGNO(sbi, blkaddr + del_count - 1));
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < del_count; i++) {
> +		exist = f2fs_test_and_clear_bit(offset + i, se->cur_valid_map);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_F2FS_CHECK_FS
> +		mir_exist = f2fs_test_and_clear_bit(offset + i,
> +						se->cur_valid_map_mir);
> +		if (unlikely(exist != mir_exist)) {
> +			f2fs_err(sbi, "Inconsistent error when clearing bitmap, blk:%u, old bit:%d",
> +				 blkaddr + i, exist);
> +			f2fs_bug_on(sbi, 1);
> +		}
> +#endif
> +		if (unlikely(!exist)) {
> +			f2fs_err(sbi, "Bitmap was wrongly cleared, blk:%u",
> +				 blkaddr + i);
> +			f2fs_bug_on(sbi, 1);
> +			se->valid_blocks++;
> +			del += 1;
> +		} else if (unlikely(is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_CP_DISABLED))) {
> +			/*
> +			 * If checkpoints are off, we must not reuse data that
> +			 * was used in the previous checkpoint. If it was used
> +			 * before, we must track that to know how much space we
> +			 * really have.
> +			 */
> +			if (f2fs_test_bit(offset + i, se->ckpt_valid_map)) {
> +				spin_lock(&sbi->stat_lock);
> +				sbi->unusable_block_count++;
> +				spin_unlock(&sbi->stat_lock);
> +			}
> +		}
> +
> +		if (f2fs_block_unit_discard(sbi) &&
> +			f2fs_test_and_clear_bit(offset + i, se->discard_map))
> +			sbi->discard_blks++;
> +
> +		if (!f2fs_test_bit(offset + i, se->ckpt_valid_map))
> +			se->ckpt_valid_blocks -= 1;
> +	}
> +
> +	return del;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * If releasing blocks, this function supports updating multiple consecutive blocks
> + * at one time, but please note that these consecutive blocks need to belong to the
> + * same segment.
> + */
>  static void update_sit_entry(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, block_t blkaddr, int del)
>  {
>  	struct seg_entry *se;
> @@ -2479,43 +2543,12 @@ static void update_sit_entry(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, block_t blkaddr, int del)
>  			if (!f2fs_test_and_set_bit(offset, se->ckpt_valid_map))
>  				se->ckpt_valid_blocks++;
>  		}
> -	} else {
> -		exist = f2fs_test_and_clear_bit(offset, se->cur_valid_map);
> -#ifdef CONFIG_F2FS_CHECK_FS
> -		mir_exist = f2fs_test_and_clear_bit(offset,
> -						se->cur_valid_map_mir);
> -		if (unlikely(exist != mir_exist)) {
> -			f2fs_err(sbi, "Inconsistent error when clearing bitmap, blk:%u, old bit:%d",
> -				 blkaddr, exist);
> -			f2fs_bug_on(sbi, 1);
> -		}
> -#endif
> -		if (unlikely(!exist)) {
> -			f2fs_err(sbi, "Bitmap was wrongly cleared, blk:%u",
> -				 blkaddr);
> -			f2fs_bug_on(sbi, 1);
> -			se->valid_blocks++;
> -			del = 0;
> -		} else if (unlikely(is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_CP_DISABLED))) {
> -			/*
> -			 * If checkpoints are off, we must not reuse data that
> -			 * was used in the previous checkpoint. If it was used
> -			 * before, we must track that to know how much space we
> -			 * really have.
> -			 */
> -			if (f2fs_test_bit(offset, se->ckpt_valid_map)) {
> -				spin_lock(&sbi->stat_lock);
> -				sbi->unusable_block_count++;
> -				spin_unlock(&sbi->stat_lock);
> -			}
> -		}
>  
> -		if (f2fs_block_unit_discard(sbi) &&
> -			f2fs_test_and_clear_bit(offset, se->discard_map))
> -			sbi->discard_blks++;
> +		if (!f2fs_test_bit(offset, se->ckpt_valid_map))
> +			se->ckpt_valid_blocks += del;
> +	} else {
> +		del = update_sit_entry_for_release(sbi, se, blkaddr, offset, del);
>  	}
> -	if (!f2fs_test_bit(offset, se->ckpt_valid_map))
> -		se->ckpt_valid_blocks += del;
>  
>  	__mark_sit_entry_dirty(sbi, segno);
>  
> -- 
> 2.25.1


_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
To: Yi Sun <yi.sun@unisoc.com>
Cc: chao@kernel.org, sunyibuaa@gmail.com,
	linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, niuzhiguo84@gmail.com,
	Hao_hao.Wang@unisoc.com, ke.wang@unisoc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] f2fs: introduce update_sit_entry_for_release()
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2024 21:22:08 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z2XgAMRm6uMAT2XM@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241104034545.497907-4-yi.sun@unisoc.com>

This makes the code being inconsistent. Can you refactor first and add the loop
later separately?

For example,
1) add two functions, update_sit_entry_for_alloc() and update_sit_entry_for_release()
2) add a loop in update_sit_entry_for_release()

Thanks,

On 11/04, Yi Sun wrote:
> This function can process some consecutive blocks at a time.
> 
> When using update_sit_entry() to release consecutive blocks,
> ensure that the consecutive blocks belong to the same segment.
> Because after update_sit_entry_for_realese(), @segno is still
> in use in update_sit_entry().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yi Sun <yi.sun@unisoc.com>
> ---
>  fs/f2fs/segment.c | 103 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
>  1 file changed, 68 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> index 5386ae18d808..843171ce414b 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> @@ -2424,6 +2424,70 @@ static void update_segment_mtime(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, block_t blkaddr,
>  		SIT_I(sbi)->max_mtime = ctime;
>  }
>  
> +/*
> + * NOTE: when updating multiple blocks at the same time, please ensure
> + * that the consecutive input blocks belong to the same segment.
> + */
> +
> +static int update_sit_entry_for_release(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct seg_entry *se,
> +				block_t blkaddr, unsigned int offset, int del)
> +{
> +	bool exist;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_F2FS_CHECK_FS
> +	bool mir_exist;
> +#endif
> +	int i;
> +	int del_count = -del;
> +
> +	f2fs_bug_on(sbi, GET_SEGNO(sbi, blkaddr) != GET_SEGNO(sbi, blkaddr + del_count - 1));
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < del_count; i++) {
> +		exist = f2fs_test_and_clear_bit(offset + i, se->cur_valid_map);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_F2FS_CHECK_FS
> +		mir_exist = f2fs_test_and_clear_bit(offset + i,
> +						se->cur_valid_map_mir);
> +		if (unlikely(exist != mir_exist)) {
> +			f2fs_err(sbi, "Inconsistent error when clearing bitmap, blk:%u, old bit:%d",
> +				 blkaddr + i, exist);
> +			f2fs_bug_on(sbi, 1);
> +		}
> +#endif
> +		if (unlikely(!exist)) {
> +			f2fs_err(sbi, "Bitmap was wrongly cleared, blk:%u",
> +				 blkaddr + i);
> +			f2fs_bug_on(sbi, 1);
> +			se->valid_blocks++;
> +			del += 1;
> +		} else if (unlikely(is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_CP_DISABLED))) {
> +			/*
> +			 * If checkpoints are off, we must not reuse data that
> +			 * was used in the previous checkpoint. If it was used
> +			 * before, we must track that to know how much space we
> +			 * really have.
> +			 */
> +			if (f2fs_test_bit(offset + i, se->ckpt_valid_map)) {
> +				spin_lock(&sbi->stat_lock);
> +				sbi->unusable_block_count++;
> +				spin_unlock(&sbi->stat_lock);
> +			}
> +		}
> +
> +		if (f2fs_block_unit_discard(sbi) &&
> +			f2fs_test_and_clear_bit(offset + i, se->discard_map))
> +			sbi->discard_blks++;
> +
> +		if (!f2fs_test_bit(offset + i, se->ckpt_valid_map))
> +			se->ckpt_valid_blocks -= 1;
> +	}
> +
> +	return del;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * If releasing blocks, this function supports updating multiple consecutive blocks
> + * at one time, but please note that these consecutive blocks need to belong to the
> + * same segment.
> + */
>  static void update_sit_entry(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, block_t blkaddr, int del)
>  {
>  	struct seg_entry *se;
> @@ -2479,43 +2543,12 @@ static void update_sit_entry(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, block_t blkaddr, int del)
>  			if (!f2fs_test_and_set_bit(offset, se->ckpt_valid_map))
>  				se->ckpt_valid_blocks++;
>  		}
> -	} else {
> -		exist = f2fs_test_and_clear_bit(offset, se->cur_valid_map);
> -#ifdef CONFIG_F2FS_CHECK_FS
> -		mir_exist = f2fs_test_and_clear_bit(offset,
> -						se->cur_valid_map_mir);
> -		if (unlikely(exist != mir_exist)) {
> -			f2fs_err(sbi, "Inconsistent error when clearing bitmap, blk:%u, old bit:%d",
> -				 blkaddr, exist);
> -			f2fs_bug_on(sbi, 1);
> -		}
> -#endif
> -		if (unlikely(!exist)) {
> -			f2fs_err(sbi, "Bitmap was wrongly cleared, blk:%u",
> -				 blkaddr);
> -			f2fs_bug_on(sbi, 1);
> -			se->valid_blocks++;
> -			del = 0;
> -		} else if (unlikely(is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_CP_DISABLED))) {
> -			/*
> -			 * If checkpoints are off, we must not reuse data that
> -			 * was used in the previous checkpoint. If it was used
> -			 * before, we must track that to know how much space we
> -			 * really have.
> -			 */
> -			if (f2fs_test_bit(offset, se->ckpt_valid_map)) {
> -				spin_lock(&sbi->stat_lock);
> -				sbi->unusable_block_count++;
> -				spin_unlock(&sbi->stat_lock);
> -			}
> -		}
>  
> -		if (f2fs_block_unit_discard(sbi) &&
> -			f2fs_test_and_clear_bit(offset, se->discard_map))
> -			sbi->discard_blks++;
> +		if (!f2fs_test_bit(offset, se->ckpt_valid_map))
> +			se->ckpt_valid_blocks += del;
> +	} else {
> +		del = update_sit_entry_for_release(sbi, se, blkaddr, offset, del);
>  	}
> -	if (!f2fs_test_bit(offset, se->ckpt_valid_map))
> -		se->ckpt_valid_blocks += del;
>  
>  	__mark_sit_entry_dirty(sbi, segno);
>  
> -- 
> 2.25.1

  reply	other threads:[~2024-12-20 21:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-11-04  3:45 [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v3 0/5] Speed up f2fs truncate Yi Sun
2024-11-04  3:45 ` Yi Sun
2024-11-04  3:45 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v3 1/5] f2fs: expand f2fs_invalidate_compress_page() to f2fs_invalidate_compress_pages_range() Yi Sun
2024-11-04  3:45   ` Yi Sun
2024-11-04  3:45 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v3 2/5] f2fs: add parameter @len to f2fs_invalidate_internal_cache() Yi Sun
2024-11-04  3:45   ` Yi Sun
2024-11-04  3:45 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v3 3/5] f2fs: introduce update_sit_entry_for_release() Yi Sun
2024-11-04  3:45   ` Yi Sun
2024-12-20 21:22   ` Jaegeuk Kim via Linux-f2fs-devel [this message]
2024-12-20 21:22     ` Jaegeuk Kim
2024-11-04  3:45 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v3 4/5] f2fs: add parameter @len to f2fs_invalidate_blocks() Yi Sun
2024-11-04  3:45   ` Yi Sun
2024-11-04  3:45 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v3 5/5] f2fs: Optimize f2fs_truncate_data_blocks_range() Yi Sun
2024-11-04  3:45   ` Yi Sun
2024-12-11  3:08   ` [f2fs-dev] " yi sun
2024-12-11  3:08     ` yi sun
2024-12-12 16:22     ` [f2fs-dev] " Jaegeuk Kim via Linux-f2fs-devel
2024-12-12 16:22       ` Jaegeuk Kim
2024-12-18  8:00       ` [f2fs-dev] " yi sun
2024-12-18  8:00         ` yi sun

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z2XgAMRm6uMAT2XM@google.com \
    --to=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=Hao_hao.Wang@unisoc.com \
    --cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=ke.wang@unisoc.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sunyibuaa@gmail.com \
    --cc=yi.sun@unisoc.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.