All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Long Li <leo.lilong@huawei.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Cc: <cem@kernel.org>, <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>,
	<david@fromorbit.com>, <yi.zhang@huawei.com>,
	<houtao1@huawei.com>, <yangerkun@huawei.com>,
	<lonuxli.64@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] xfs: correct the sb_rgcount when the disk not support rt volume
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2025 15:10:28 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z34k5Pu8UaG0DzsB@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z34hciJJXpgdoMOc@infradead.org>

On Tue, Jan 07, 2025 at 10:55:46PM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 06, 2025 at 11:52:20AM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 31, 2024 at 10:34:22AM +0800, Long Li wrote:
> > > When mounting an xfs disk that incompat with metadir and has no realtime
> > > subvolume, if CONFIG_XFS_RT is not enabled in the kernel, the mount will
> > > fail. During superblock log recovery, since mp->m_sb.sb_rgcount is greater
> > > than 0, updating the last rtag in-core is required, however, without
> > > CONFIG_XFS_RT enabled, xfs_update_last_rtgroup_size() always returns
> > > -EOPNOTSUPP, leading to mount failure.
> > 
> > Didn't we fix the xfs_update_last_rtgroup_size stub to return 0?
> 
> Hmm, looks like the patch did not get merged.  I'll send a ping.
> 

Oh, I didn't notice you fixed this before!

  reply	other threads:[~2025-01-08  7:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-12-31  2:34 [PATCH 0/2] xfs: fix two issues regarding mount failures Long Li
2024-12-31  2:34 ` [PATCH 1/2] xfs: correct the sb_rgcount when the disk not support rt volume Long Li
2025-01-06 19:52   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-01-07 13:11     ` Long Li
2025-01-08  0:32       ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-01-08  1:26         ` Long Li
2025-01-08  6:58       ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-08  7:22         ` Long Li
2025-01-08  6:55     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-08  7:10       ` Long Li [this message]
2024-12-31  2:34 ` [PATCH 2/2] xfs: fix mount hang during primary superblock recovery failure Long Li
2025-01-06 19:55   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-01-07 13:39     ` Long Li
2025-01-08  0:34       ` Darrick J. Wong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z34k5Pu8UaG0DzsB@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=leo.lilong@huawei.com \
    --cc=cem@kernel.org \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=houtao1@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lonuxli.64@gmail.com \
    --cc=yangerkun@huawei.com \
    --cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.