From: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
To: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org>, Barry Song <v-songbaohua@oppo.com>,
Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>,
"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com>,
Nhat Pham <nphamcs@gmail.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/13] mm, swap: minor clean up for swap entry allocation
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2025 12:04:49 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z39K4cGuXbQs9Pwu@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241230174621.61185-2-ryncsn@gmail.com>
On 12/31/24 at 01:46am, Kairui Song wrote:
> From: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>
>
> Direct reclaim can skip the whole folio after reclaimed a set of
> folio based slots. Also simplify the code for allocation, reduce
> indention.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>
> ---
> mm/swapfile.c | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
> 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
This actually can be split as two patches. Anyway,
Reviewed-by: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
>
> diff --git a/mm/swapfile.c b/mm/swapfile.c
> index b0a9071cfe1d..f8002f110104 100644
> --- a/mm/swapfile.c
> +++ b/mm/swapfile.c
> @@ -604,23 +604,28 @@ static bool cluster_reclaim_range(struct swap_info_struct *si,
> unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
> {
> unsigned char *map = si->swap_map;
> - unsigned long offset;
> + unsigned long offset = start;
> + int nr_reclaim;
>
> spin_unlock(&ci->lock);
> spin_unlock(&si->lock);
>
> - for (offset = start; offset < end; offset++) {
> + do {
> switch (READ_ONCE(map[offset])) {
> case 0:
> - continue;
> + offset++;
> + break;
> case SWAP_HAS_CACHE:
> - if (__try_to_reclaim_swap(si, offset, TTRS_ANYWAY | TTRS_DIRECT) > 0)
> - continue;
> - goto out;
> + nr_reclaim = __try_to_reclaim_swap(si, offset, TTRS_ANYWAY | TTRS_DIRECT);
> + if (nr_reclaim > 0)
> + offset += nr_reclaim;
> + else
> + goto out;
> + break;
> default:
> goto out;
> }
> - }
> + } while (offset < end);
> out:
> spin_lock(&si->lock);
> spin_lock(&ci->lock);
> @@ -838,35 +843,30 @@ static unsigned long cluster_alloc_swap_entry(struct swap_info_struct *si, int o
> &found, order, usage);
> frags++;
> if (found)
> - break;
> + goto done;
> }
>
> - if (!found) {
> + /*
> + * Nonfull clusters are moved to frag tail if we reached
> + * here, count them too, don't over scan the frag list.
> + */
> + while (frags < si->frag_cluster_nr[order]) {
> + ci = list_first_entry(&si->frag_clusters[order],
> + struct swap_cluster_info, list);
> /*
> - * Nonfull clusters are moved to frag tail if we reached
> - * here, count them too, don't over scan the frag list.
> + * Rotate the frag list to iterate, they were all failing
> + * high order allocation or moved here due to per-CPU usage,
> + * this help keeping usable cluster ahead.
> */
> - while (frags < si->frag_cluster_nr[order]) {
> - ci = list_first_entry(&si->frag_clusters[order],
> - struct swap_cluster_info, list);
> - /*
> - * Rotate the frag list to iterate, they were all failing
> - * high order allocation or moved here due to per-CPU usage,
> - * this help keeping usable cluster ahead.
> - */
> - list_move_tail(&ci->list, &si->frag_clusters[order]);
> - offset = alloc_swap_scan_cluster(si, cluster_offset(si, ci),
> - &found, order, usage);
> - frags++;
> - if (found)
> - break;
> - }
> + list_move_tail(&ci->list, &si->frag_clusters[order]);
> + offset = alloc_swap_scan_cluster(si, cluster_offset(si, ci),
> + &found, order, usage);
> + frags++;
> + if (found)
> + goto done;
> }
> }
>
> - if (found)
> - goto done;
> -
> if (!list_empty(&si->discard_clusters)) {
> /*
> * we don't have free cluster but have some clusters in
> @@ -904,7 +904,6 @@ static unsigned long cluster_alloc_swap_entry(struct swap_info_struct *si, int o
> goto done;
> }
> }
> -
> done:
> cluster->next[order] = offset;
> return found;
> --
> 2.47.1
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-09 4:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-30 17:46 [PATCH v3 00/13] mm, swap: rework of swap allocator locks Kairui Song
2024-12-30 17:46 ` [PATCH v3 01/13] mm, swap: minor clean up for swap entry allocation Kairui Song
2025-01-09 4:04 ` Baoquan He [this message]
2024-12-30 17:46 ` [PATCH v3 02/13] mm, swap: fold swap_info_get_cont in the only caller Kairui Song
2025-01-09 4:05 ` Baoquan He
2024-12-30 17:46 ` [PATCH v3 03/13] mm, swap: remove old allocation path for HDD Kairui Song
2025-01-09 4:06 ` Baoquan He
2024-12-30 17:46 ` [PATCH v3 04/13] mm, swap: use cluster lock " Kairui Song
2025-01-09 4:07 ` Baoquan He
2024-12-30 17:46 ` [PATCH v3 05/13] mm, swap: clean up device availability check Kairui Song
2025-01-09 4:08 ` Baoquan He
2024-12-30 17:46 ` [PATCH v3 06/13] mm, swap: clean up plist removal and adding Kairui Song
2025-01-02 8:59 ` Baoquan He
2025-01-03 8:07 ` Kairui Song
2024-12-30 17:46 ` [PATCH v3 07/13] mm, swap: hold a reference during scan and cleanup flag usage Kairui Song
2025-01-04 5:46 ` Baoquan He
2025-01-13 5:34 ` Kairui Song
2025-01-20 2:39 ` Baoquan He
2025-01-27 9:19 ` Kairui Song
2025-02-05 9:18 ` Baoquan He
2024-12-30 17:46 ` [PATCH v3 08/13] mm, swap: use an enum to define all cluster flags and wrap flags changes Kairui Song
2025-01-06 8:43 ` Baoquan He
2025-01-13 5:49 ` Kairui Song
2024-12-30 17:46 ` [PATCH v3 09/13] mm, swap: reduce contention on device lock Kairui Song
2025-01-06 10:12 ` Baoquan He
2025-01-08 11:09 ` Baoquan He
2025-01-09 2:15 ` Kairui Song
2025-01-10 11:23 ` Baoquan He
2025-01-13 6:33 ` Kairui Song
2025-01-13 8:07 ` Kairui Song
2024-12-30 17:46 ` [PATCH v3 10/13] mm, swap: simplify percpu cluster updating Kairui Song
2025-01-09 2:07 ` Baoquan He
2024-12-30 17:46 ` [PATCH v3 11/13] mm, swap: introduce a helper for retrieving cluster from offset Kairui Song
2024-12-30 17:46 ` [PATCH v3 12/13] mm, swap: use a global swap cluster for non-rotation devices Kairui Song
2024-12-30 17:46 ` [PATCH v3 13/13] mm, swap_slots: remove slot cache for freeing path Kairui Song
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z39K4cGuXbQs9Pwu@MiWiFi-R3L-srv \
--to=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=chrisl@kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=kaleshsingh@google.com \
--cc=kasong@tencent.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=nphamcs@gmail.com \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=v-songbaohua@oppo.com \
--cc=ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=yosryahmed@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.