Re: [PATCH v3 09/13] mm, swap: reduce contention on device lock

[Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>]

On 12/31/24 at 01:46am, Kairui Song wrote:
......snip..
> +
> +/*
> + * Must be called after allocation, moves the cluster to full or frag list.
> + * Note: allocation doesn't acquire si lock, and may drop the ci lock for
> + * reclaim, so the cluster could be any where when called.
> + */
> +static void relocate_cluster(struct swap_info_struct *si,
> +			     struct swap_cluster_info *ci)
> +{
> +	lockdep_assert_held(&ci->lock);
> +
> +	/* Discard cluster must remain off-list or on discard list */
> +	if (cluster_is_discard(ci))
> +		return;
> +
> +	if (!ci->count) {
> +		free_cluster(si, ci);

relocate_cluster() is only called in alloc_swap_scan_cluster(), there
seems to be no chance to have 'ci->count == 0' case when allocating. Do
I miss anything here? 


> +	} else if (ci->count != SWAPFILE_CLUSTER) {
> +		if (ci->flags != CLUSTER_FLAG_FRAG)
> +			cluster_move(si, ci, &si->frag_clusters[ci->order],
> +				     CLUSTER_FLAG_FRAG);
> +	} else {
> +		if (ci->flags != CLUSTER_FLAG_FULL)
> +			cluster_move(si, ci, &si->full_clusters,
> +				     CLUSTER_FLAG_FULL);
> +	}
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * The cluster corresponding to page_nr will be used. The cluster will not be
>   * added to free cluster list and its usage counter will be increased by 1.