From: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc: "Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
"Manivannan Sadhasivam" <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>,
"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"Heiko Stuebner" <heiko@sntech.de>,
"Damien Le Moal" <dlemoal@kernel.org>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: dw-rockchip: Enumerate endpoints based on dll_link_up irq in the combined sys irq
Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2025 18:09:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z3bIQj4b-9gV-Sd9@ryzen> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241230191908.GA3962801@bhelgaas>
On Mon, Dec 30, 2024 at 01:19:08PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 03:50:42PM +0100, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> > Most boards using the pcie-dw-rockchip PCIe controller lack standard
> > hotplug support.
> >
> > Thus, when an endpoint is attached to the SoC, users have to rescan the bus
> > manually to enumerate the device. This can be avoided by using the
> > 'dll_link_up' interrupt in the combined system interrupt 'sys'.
> >
> > Once the 'dll_link_up' irq is received, the bus underneath the host bridge
> > is scanned to enumerate PCIe endpoint devices.
> >
> > This commit implements the same functionality that was implemented in the
> > DWC based pcie-qcom driver in commit 4581403f6792 ("PCI: qcom: Enumerate
> > endpoints based on Link up event in 'global_irq' interrupt").
> >
> > The Root Complex specific device tree binding for pcie-dw-rockchip already
> > has the 'sys' interrupt marked as required, so there is no need to update
> > the device tree binding. This also means that we can request the 'sys' IRQ
> > unconditionally.
>
> Thanks for doing this!
>
> > @@ -436,7 +481,16 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_configure_rc(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip)
> > pp = &rockchip->pci.pp;
> > pp->ops = &rockchip_pcie_host_ops;
> >
> > - return dw_pcie_host_init(pp);
> > + ret = dw_pcie_host_init(pp);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + dev_err(dev, "failed to initialize host\n");
> > + return ret;
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* unmask DLL up/down indicator */
> > + rockchip_pcie_writel_apb(rockchip, 0x20000, PCIE_CLIENT_INTR_MASK_MISC);
>
> I know we already had a bare 0x60000 in rockchip_pcie_configure_ep(),
> but can we add #defines for both of these PCIE_CLIENT_INTR_MASK_MISC
> bits?
Sure, I will send a follow-up patch.
Kind regards,
Niklas
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc: "Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
"Manivannan Sadhasivam" <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>,
"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"Heiko Stuebner" <heiko@sntech.de>,
"Damien Le Moal" <dlemoal@kernel.org>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: dw-rockchip: Enumerate endpoints based on dll_link_up irq in the combined sys irq
Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2025 18:09:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z3bIQj4b-9gV-Sd9@ryzen> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241230191908.GA3962801@bhelgaas>
On Mon, Dec 30, 2024 at 01:19:08PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 03:50:42PM +0100, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> > Most boards using the pcie-dw-rockchip PCIe controller lack standard
> > hotplug support.
> >
> > Thus, when an endpoint is attached to the SoC, users have to rescan the bus
> > manually to enumerate the device. This can be avoided by using the
> > 'dll_link_up' interrupt in the combined system interrupt 'sys'.
> >
> > Once the 'dll_link_up' irq is received, the bus underneath the host bridge
> > is scanned to enumerate PCIe endpoint devices.
> >
> > This commit implements the same functionality that was implemented in the
> > DWC based pcie-qcom driver in commit 4581403f6792 ("PCI: qcom: Enumerate
> > endpoints based on Link up event in 'global_irq' interrupt").
> >
> > The Root Complex specific device tree binding for pcie-dw-rockchip already
> > has the 'sys' interrupt marked as required, so there is no need to update
> > the device tree binding. This also means that we can request the 'sys' IRQ
> > unconditionally.
>
> Thanks for doing this!
>
> > @@ -436,7 +481,16 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_configure_rc(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip)
> > pp = &rockchip->pci.pp;
> > pp->ops = &rockchip_pcie_host_ops;
> >
> > - return dw_pcie_host_init(pp);
> > + ret = dw_pcie_host_init(pp);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + dev_err(dev, "failed to initialize host\n");
> > + return ret;
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* unmask DLL up/down indicator */
> > + rockchip_pcie_writel_apb(rockchip, 0x20000, PCIE_CLIENT_INTR_MASK_MISC);
>
> I know we already had a bare 0x60000 in rockchip_pcie_configure_ep(),
> but can we add #defines for both of these PCIE_CLIENT_INTR_MASK_MISC
> bits?
Sure, I will send a follow-up patch.
Kind regards,
Niklas
_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-02 17:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-27 14:50 [PATCH] PCI: dw-rockchip: Enumerate endpoints based on dll_link_up irq in the combined sys irq Niklas Cassel
2024-11-27 14:50 ` Niklas Cassel
2024-12-11 5:31 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-12-11 5:31 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-12-12 8:04 ` Niklas Cassel
2024-12-12 8:04 ` Niklas Cassel
2024-12-19 14:22 ` Niklas Cassel
2024-12-19 14:22 ` Niklas Cassel
2024-12-22 21:12 ` Krzysztof Wilczyński
2024-12-22 21:12 ` Krzysztof Wilczyński
2024-12-30 19:19 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-12-30 19:19 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-01-02 17:09 ` Niklas Cassel [this message]
2025-01-02 17:09 ` Niklas Cassel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z3bIQj4b-9gV-Sd9@ryzen \
--to=cassel@kernel.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=kw@linux.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.