From: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
To: "Kwapulinski, Piotr" <piotr.kwapulinski@intel.com>
Cc: "intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org"
<intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"dan.carpenter@linaro.org" <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>,
"yuehaibing@huawei.com" <yuehaibing@huawei.com>,
"Kitszel, Przemyslaw" <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next v2] ixgbe: Fix possible skb NULL pointer dereference
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2025 13:27:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z5I1vbqNpAUnyxnC@boxer> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DM6PR11MB4610D74ED1F1AB5575AE246EF3E02@DM6PR11MB4610.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 09:19:34AM +0100, Kwapulinski, Piotr wrote:
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Fijalkowski, Maciej <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
> >Sent: Monday, January 20, 2025 3:45 PM
> >To: Kwapulinski, Piotr <piotr.kwapulinski@intel.com>
> >Cc: intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org; netdev@vger.kernel.org; dan.carpenter@linaro.org; yuehaibing@huawei.com; Kitszel, Przemyslaw <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>
> >Subject: Re: [PATCH iwl-next v2] ixgbe: Fix possible skb NULL pointer dereference
> >
> >On Fri, Jan 17, 2025 at 04:49:35PM +0100, Piotr Kwapulinski wrote:
> >> The commit c824125cbb18 ("ixgbe: Fix passing 0 to ERR_PTR in
> >> ixgbe_run_xdp()") stopped utilizing the ERR-like macros for xdp status
> >> encoding. Propagate this logic to the ixgbe_put_rx_buffer().
> >>
> >> The commit also relaxed the skb NULL pointer check - caught by Smatch.
> >> Restore this check.
> >>
> >> Fixes: c824125cbb18 ("ixgbe: Fix passing 0 to ERR_PTR in
> >> ixgbe_run_xdp()")
> >> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
> >> Signed-off-by: Piotr Kwapulinski <piotr.kwapulinski@intel.com>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c | 9 +++++----
> >> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
> >> b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
> >> index 7236f20..c682c3d 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
> >> @@ -2098,14 +2098,14 @@ static struct ixgbe_rx_buffer
> >> *ixgbe_get_rx_buffer(struct ixgbe_ring *rx_ring,
> >>
> >> static void ixgbe_put_rx_buffer(struct ixgbe_ring *rx_ring,
> >> struct ixgbe_rx_buffer *rx_buffer,
> >> - struct sk_buff *skb,
> >> - int rx_buffer_pgcnt)
> >> + struct sk_buff *skb, int rx_buffer_pgcnt,
> >> + int xdp_res)
> >> {
> >> if (ixgbe_can_reuse_rx_page(rx_buffer, rx_buffer_pgcnt)) {
> >> /* hand second half of page back to the ring */
> >> ixgbe_reuse_rx_page(rx_ring, rx_buffer);
> >> } else {
> >> - if (!IS_ERR(skb) && IXGBE_CB(skb)->dma == rx_buffer->dma) {
> >> + if (skb && !xdp_res && IXGBE_CB(skb)->dma == rx_buffer->dma) {
> >
> >xdp_res check is redundant here. skb ptr will be non-null only for xdp_res == 0. so skb != NULL implies xdp_res == 0.
> That was tempting but eventually the ixgbe_run_xdp() handles the error exclusively. I suggest to leave it as it is.
ixgbe_run_xdp() on error paths will still return one of our homegrown XDP
statuses:
#define IXGBE_XDP_PASS 0
#define IXGBE_XDP_CONSUMED BIT(0)
#define IXGBE_XDP_TX BIT(1)
#define IXGBE_XDP_REDIR BIT(2)
#define IXGBE_XDP_EXIT BIT(3)
Plus the case "!xdp_res && !skb" is explicitly checked before calling
ixgbe_put_rx_buffer() and you're gonna break the rx loop altogether. This
happens when you failed to alloc skb for IXGBE_XDP_PASS.
> Thanks,
> Piotr
>
> >
> >If I am not mistaken:D or ixgbe has some code path I missed.
> >
> >Besides this, thanks for improving commit message!
> >
> >> /* the page has been released from the ring */
> >> IXGBE_CB(skb)->page_released = true;
> >> } else {
> >> @@ -2415,7 +2415,8 @@ static int ixgbe_clean_rx_irq(struct ixgbe_q_vector *q_vector,
> >> break;
> >> }
> >>
> >> - ixgbe_put_rx_buffer(rx_ring, rx_buffer, skb, rx_buffer_pgcnt);
> >> + ixgbe_put_rx_buffer(rx_ring, rx_buffer, skb, rx_buffer_pgcnt,
> >> + xdp_res);
> >> cleaned_count++;
> >>
> >> /* place incomplete frames back on ring for completion */
> >> --
> >> v1 -> v2
> >> Provide extra details in commit message for motivation of this patch.
> >>
> >> 2.43.0
> >>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
To: "Kwapulinski, Piotr" <piotr.kwapulinski@intel.com>
Cc: "intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org"
<intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"dan.carpenter@linaro.org" <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>,
"yuehaibing@huawei.com" <yuehaibing@huawei.com>,
"Kitszel, Przemyslaw" <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH iwl-next v2] ixgbe: Fix possible skb NULL pointer dereference
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2025 13:27:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z5I1vbqNpAUnyxnC@boxer> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DM6PR11MB4610D74ED1F1AB5575AE246EF3E02@DM6PR11MB4610.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 09:19:34AM +0100, Kwapulinski, Piotr wrote:
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Fijalkowski, Maciej <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
> >Sent: Monday, January 20, 2025 3:45 PM
> >To: Kwapulinski, Piotr <piotr.kwapulinski@intel.com>
> >Cc: intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org; netdev@vger.kernel.org; dan.carpenter@linaro.org; yuehaibing@huawei.com; Kitszel, Przemyslaw <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>
> >Subject: Re: [PATCH iwl-next v2] ixgbe: Fix possible skb NULL pointer dereference
> >
> >On Fri, Jan 17, 2025 at 04:49:35PM +0100, Piotr Kwapulinski wrote:
> >> The commit c824125cbb18 ("ixgbe: Fix passing 0 to ERR_PTR in
> >> ixgbe_run_xdp()") stopped utilizing the ERR-like macros for xdp status
> >> encoding. Propagate this logic to the ixgbe_put_rx_buffer().
> >>
> >> The commit also relaxed the skb NULL pointer check - caught by Smatch.
> >> Restore this check.
> >>
> >> Fixes: c824125cbb18 ("ixgbe: Fix passing 0 to ERR_PTR in
> >> ixgbe_run_xdp()")
> >> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
> >> Signed-off-by: Piotr Kwapulinski <piotr.kwapulinski@intel.com>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c | 9 +++++----
> >> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
> >> b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
> >> index 7236f20..c682c3d 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
> >> @@ -2098,14 +2098,14 @@ static struct ixgbe_rx_buffer
> >> *ixgbe_get_rx_buffer(struct ixgbe_ring *rx_ring,
> >>
> >> static void ixgbe_put_rx_buffer(struct ixgbe_ring *rx_ring,
> >> struct ixgbe_rx_buffer *rx_buffer,
> >> - struct sk_buff *skb,
> >> - int rx_buffer_pgcnt)
> >> + struct sk_buff *skb, int rx_buffer_pgcnt,
> >> + int xdp_res)
> >> {
> >> if (ixgbe_can_reuse_rx_page(rx_buffer, rx_buffer_pgcnt)) {
> >> /* hand second half of page back to the ring */
> >> ixgbe_reuse_rx_page(rx_ring, rx_buffer);
> >> } else {
> >> - if (!IS_ERR(skb) && IXGBE_CB(skb)->dma == rx_buffer->dma) {
> >> + if (skb && !xdp_res && IXGBE_CB(skb)->dma == rx_buffer->dma) {
> >
> >xdp_res check is redundant here. skb ptr will be non-null only for xdp_res == 0. so skb != NULL implies xdp_res == 0.
> That was tempting but eventually the ixgbe_run_xdp() handles the error exclusively. I suggest to leave it as it is.
ixgbe_run_xdp() on error paths will still return one of our homegrown XDP
statuses:
#define IXGBE_XDP_PASS 0
#define IXGBE_XDP_CONSUMED BIT(0)
#define IXGBE_XDP_TX BIT(1)
#define IXGBE_XDP_REDIR BIT(2)
#define IXGBE_XDP_EXIT BIT(3)
Plus the case "!xdp_res && !skb" is explicitly checked before calling
ixgbe_put_rx_buffer() and you're gonna break the rx loop altogether. This
happens when you failed to alloc skb for IXGBE_XDP_PASS.
> Thanks,
> Piotr
>
> >
> >If I am not mistaken:D or ixgbe has some code path I missed.
> >
> >Besides this, thanks for improving commit message!
> >
> >> /* the page has been released from the ring */
> >> IXGBE_CB(skb)->page_released = true;
> >> } else {
> >> @@ -2415,7 +2415,8 @@ static int ixgbe_clean_rx_irq(struct ixgbe_q_vector *q_vector,
> >> break;
> >> }
> >>
> >> - ixgbe_put_rx_buffer(rx_ring, rx_buffer, skb, rx_buffer_pgcnt);
> >> + ixgbe_put_rx_buffer(rx_ring, rx_buffer, skb, rx_buffer_pgcnt,
> >> + xdp_res);
> >> cleaned_count++;
> >>
> >> /* place incomplete frames back on ring for completion */
> >> --
> >> v1 -> v2
> >> Provide extra details in commit message for motivation of this patch.
> >>
> >> 2.43.0
> >>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-23 12:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-17 15:49 [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next v2] ixgbe: Fix possible skb NULL pointer dereference Piotr Kwapulinski
2025-01-17 15:49 ` Piotr Kwapulinski
2025-01-20 14:45 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Maciej Fijalkowski
2025-01-20 14:45 ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2025-01-23 8:19 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Kwapulinski, Piotr
2025-01-23 8:19 ` Kwapulinski, Piotr
2025-01-23 12:27 ` Maciej Fijalkowski [this message]
2025-01-23 12:27 ` Maciej Fijalkowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z5I1vbqNpAUnyxnC@boxer \
--to=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
--cc=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=piotr.kwapulinski@intel.com \
--cc=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
--cc=yuehaibing@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.