From: Charlie Jenkins <charlie@rivosinc.com>
To: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>
Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
WANG Xuerui <kernel@xen0n.name>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@rivosinc.com>,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
loongarch@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] loongarch: entry: Migrate ret_from_fork() to C
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2025 14:23:42 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z5QS7iQroTpt5kpr@ghost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z5Pb4jsO_qH6Wrx7@ghost>
On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 10:28:50AM -0800, Charlie Jenkins wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 05:05:21PM +0800, Huacai Chen wrote:
> > Hi, Charlie,
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 3:15 AM Charlie Jenkins <charlie@rivosinc.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Loongarch is the only architecture that calls
> > We usually use "LoongArch" instead of "loongarch" or "Loongarch".
> >
> > > syscall_exit_to_user_mode() from asm. Move the call into C so that this
> > > function can be inlined across all architectures.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Charlie Jenkins <charlie@rivosinc.com>
> > > ---
> > > arch/loongarch/include/asm/asm-prototypes.h | 5 +++++
> > > arch/loongarch/include/asm/switch_to.h | 8 +++++++
> > > arch/loongarch/kernel/entry.S | 22 +++++++++----------
> > > arch/loongarch/kernel/process.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> > > 4 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/asm-prototypes.h b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/asm-prototypes.h
> > > index 51f224bcfc654228ae423e9a066b25b35102a5b9..0195d4309fd29f94664d5f34247198c769033b1b 100644
> > > --- a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/asm-prototypes.h
> > > +++ b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/asm-prototypes.h
> > > @@ -12,3 +12,8 @@ __int128_t __ashlti3(__int128_t a, int b);
> > > __int128_t __ashrti3(__int128_t a, int b);
> > > __int128_t __lshrti3(__int128_t a, int b);
> > > #endif
> > > +
> > > +asmlinkage void noinstr __no_stack_protector ret_from_kernel_thread(struct task_struct *prev,
> > > + struct pt_regs *regs,
> > > + int (*fn)(void *),
> > > + void *fn_arg);
> > It is a little strange that we only need to declare
> > ret_from_kernel_thread() but not ret_from_fork().
>
> Just an oversight by me, thank you for pointing that out.
Oh I see what I did, I meant to put these functions in asm-prototypes
and not in switch_to but I ended up putting them in both.
- Charlie
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Charlie Jenkins <charlie@rivosinc.com>
To: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>
Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
WANG Xuerui <kernel@xen0n.name>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@rivosinc.com>,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
loongarch@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] loongarch: entry: Migrate ret_from_fork() to C
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2025 14:23:42 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z5QS7iQroTpt5kpr@ghost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z5Pb4jsO_qH6Wrx7@ghost>
On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 10:28:50AM -0800, Charlie Jenkins wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 05:05:21PM +0800, Huacai Chen wrote:
> > Hi, Charlie,
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 3:15 AM Charlie Jenkins <charlie@rivosinc.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Loongarch is the only architecture that calls
> > We usually use "LoongArch" instead of "loongarch" or "Loongarch".
> >
> > > syscall_exit_to_user_mode() from asm. Move the call into C so that this
> > > function can be inlined across all architectures.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Charlie Jenkins <charlie@rivosinc.com>
> > > ---
> > > arch/loongarch/include/asm/asm-prototypes.h | 5 +++++
> > > arch/loongarch/include/asm/switch_to.h | 8 +++++++
> > > arch/loongarch/kernel/entry.S | 22 +++++++++----------
> > > arch/loongarch/kernel/process.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> > > 4 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/asm-prototypes.h b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/asm-prototypes.h
> > > index 51f224bcfc654228ae423e9a066b25b35102a5b9..0195d4309fd29f94664d5f34247198c769033b1b 100644
> > > --- a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/asm-prototypes.h
> > > +++ b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/asm-prototypes.h
> > > @@ -12,3 +12,8 @@ __int128_t __ashlti3(__int128_t a, int b);
> > > __int128_t __ashrti3(__int128_t a, int b);
> > > __int128_t __lshrti3(__int128_t a, int b);
> > > #endif
> > > +
> > > +asmlinkage void noinstr __no_stack_protector ret_from_kernel_thread(struct task_struct *prev,
> > > + struct pt_regs *regs,
> > > + int (*fn)(void *),
> > > + void *fn_arg);
> > It is a little strange that we only need to declare
> > ret_from_kernel_thread() but not ret_from_fork().
>
> Just an oversight by me, thank you for pointing that out.
Oh I see what I did, I meant to put these functions in asm-prototypes
and not in switch_to but I ended up putting them in both.
- Charlie
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-24 22:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-23 19:14 [PATCH v2 0/4] entry: Move ret_from_fork() to C and inline syscall_exit_to_user_mode() Charlie Jenkins
2025-01-23 19:14 ` Charlie Jenkins
2025-01-23 19:14 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] riscv: entry: Convert ret_from_fork() to C Charlie Jenkins
2025-01-23 19:14 ` Charlie Jenkins
2025-01-24 13:14 ` Brian Gerst
2025-01-24 13:14 ` Brian Gerst
2025-01-24 18:23 ` Charlie Jenkins
2025-01-24 18:23 ` Charlie Jenkins
2025-01-23 19:14 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] riscv: entry: Split ret_from_fork() into user and kernel Charlie Jenkins
2025-01-23 19:14 ` Charlie Jenkins
2025-01-24 7:19 ` Alexandre Ghiti
2025-01-24 7:19 ` Alexandre Ghiti
2025-01-24 7:53 ` Charlie Jenkins
2025-01-24 7:53 ` Charlie Jenkins
2025-01-24 13:08 ` Brian Gerst
2025-01-24 13:08 ` Brian Gerst
2025-01-24 18:26 ` Charlie Jenkins
2025-01-24 18:26 ` Charlie Jenkins
2025-01-23 19:14 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] loongarch: entry: Migrate ret_from_fork() to C Charlie Jenkins
2025-01-23 19:14 ` Charlie Jenkins
2025-01-24 9:05 ` Huacai Chen
2025-01-24 9:05 ` Huacai Chen
2025-01-24 18:28 ` Charlie Jenkins
2025-01-24 18:28 ` Charlie Jenkins
2025-01-24 22:23 ` Charlie Jenkins [this message]
2025-01-24 22:23 ` Charlie Jenkins
2025-01-23 19:14 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] entry: Inline syscall_exit_to_user_mode() Charlie Jenkins
2025-01-23 19:14 ` Charlie Jenkins
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z5QS7iQroTpt5kpr@ghost \
--to=charlie@rivosinc.com \
--cc=alexghiti@rivosinc.com \
--cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel@xen0n.name \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=loongarch@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.