* [PATCH v2 1/2] sched_ext: Add an event, SCX_EV_ENQ_SLICE_DFL
2025-02-07 6:40 [PATCH v2 0/2] sched_ext: Add a core event and update scx schedulers Changwoo Min
@ 2025-02-07 6:40 ` Changwoo Min
2025-02-07 6:40 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] sched_ext: Print an event, SCX_EV_ENQ_SLICE_DFL, in scx_qmap/central Changwoo Min
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Changwoo Min @ 2025-02-07 6:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: tj, void, arighi; +Cc: kernel-dev, linux-kernel, Changwoo Min
Add a core event, SCX_EV_ENQ_SLICE_DFL, which represents how many
tasks have been enqueued (or pick_task-ed or select_cpu-ed) with
a default time slice (SCX_SLICE_DFL).
Scheduling a task with SCX_SLICE_DFL unintentionally would be a source
of latency spikes because SCX_SLICE_DFL is relatively long (20 msec).
Thus, soaring the SCX_EV_ENQ_SLICE_DFL value would be a sign of BPF
scheduler bugs, causing latency spikes, especially when ops.select_cpu()
is provided.
__scx_add_event() is used since the caller holds an rq lock or p->pi_lock,
so the preemption has already been disabled.
Signed-off-by: Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>
---
kernel/sched/ext.c | 16 +++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext.c b/kernel/sched/ext.c
index 8a9a30895381..5ef90d9bcdd2 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/ext.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/ext.c
@@ -1468,6 +1468,12 @@ struct scx_event_stats {
*/
u64 SCX_EV_ENQ_SKIP_EXITING;
+ /*
+ * The total number of tasks enqueued (or pick_task-ed) with a
+ * default time slice (SCX_SLICE_DFL).
+ */
+ u64 SCX_EV_ENQ_SLICE_DFL;
+
/*
* The total duration of bypass modes in nanoseconds.
*/
@@ -2134,6 +2140,7 @@ static void do_enqueue_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, u64 enq_flags,
*/
touch_core_sched(rq, p);
p->scx.slice = SCX_SLICE_DFL;
+ __scx_add_event(SCX_EV_ENQ_SLICE_DFL, 1);
local_norefill:
dispatch_enqueue(&rq->scx.local_dsq, p, enq_flags);
return;
@@ -2141,6 +2148,7 @@ static void do_enqueue_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, u64 enq_flags,
global:
touch_core_sched(rq, p); /* see the comment in local: */
p->scx.slice = SCX_SLICE_DFL;
+ __scx_add_event(SCX_EV_ENQ_SLICE_DFL, 1);
dispatch_enqueue(find_global_dsq(p), p, enq_flags);
}
@@ -3202,8 +3210,10 @@ static struct task_struct *pick_task_scx(struct rq *rq)
*/
if (keep_prev) {
p = prev;
- if (!p->scx.slice)
+ if (!p->scx.slice) {
p->scx.slice = SCX_SLICE_DFL;
+ __scx_add_event(SCX_EV_ENQ_SLICE_DFL, 1);
+ }
} else {
p = first_local_task(rq);
if (!p) {
@@ -3219,6 +3229,7 @@ static struct task_struct *pick_task_scx(struct rq *rq)
scx_warned_zero_slice = true;
}
p->scx.slice = SCX_SLICE_DFL;
+ __scx_add_event(SCX_EV_ENQ_SLICE_DFL, 1);
}
}
@@ -3306,6 +3317,7 @@ static int select_task_rq_scx(struct task_struct *p, int prev_cpu, int wake_flag
if (found) {
p->scx.slice = SCX_SLICE_DFL;
p->scx.ddsp_dsq_id = SCX_DSQ_LOCAL;
+ __scx_add_event(SCX_EV_ENQ_SLICE_DFL, 1);
}
if (rq_bypass)
@@ -5023,6 +5035,7 @@ static void scx_dump_state(struct scx_exit_info *ei, size_t dump_len)
scx_dump_event(s, &events, SCX_EV_DISPATCH_LOCAL_DSQ_OFFLINE);
scx_dump_event(s, &events, SCX_EV_DISPATCH_KEEP_LAST);
scx_dump_event(s, &events, SCX_EV_ENQ_SKIP_EXITING);
+ scx_dump_event(s, &events, SCX_EV_ENQ_SLICE_DFL);
scx_dump_event(s, &events, SCX_EV_BYPASS_DURATION);
scx_dump_event(s, &events, SCX_EV_BYPASS_DISPATCH);
scx_dump_event(s, &events, SCX_EV_BYPASS_ACTIVATE);
@@ -7163,6 +7176,7 @@ __bpf_kfunc void scx_bpf_events(struct scx_event_stats *events,
scx_agg_event(&e_sys, e_cpu, SCX_EV_DISPATCH_LOCAL_DSQ_OFFLINE);
scx_agg_event(&e_sys, e_cpu, SCX_EV_DISPATCH_KEEP_LAST);
scx_agg_event(&e_sys, e_cpu, SCX_EV_ENQ_SKIP_EXITING);
+ scx_agg_event(&e_sys, e_cpu, SCX_EV_ENQ_SLICE_DFL);
scx_agg_event(&e_sys, e_cpu, SCX_EV_BYPASS_DURATION);
scx_agg_event(&e_sys, e_cpu, SCX_EV_BYPASS_DISPATCH);
scx_agg_event(&e_sys, e_cpu, SCX_EV_BYPASS_ACTIVATE);
--
2.48.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* [PATCH v2 2/2] sched_ext: Print an event, SCX_EV_ENQ_SLICE_DFL, in scx_qmap/central
2025-02-07 6:40 [PATCH v2 0/2] sched_ext: Add a core event and update scx schedulers Changwoo Min
2025-02-07 6:40 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] sched_ext: Add an event, SCX_EV_ENQ_SLICE_DFL Changwoo Min
@ 2025-02-07 6:40 ` Changwoo Min
2025-02-07 6:46 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] sched_ext: Add a core event and update scx schedulers Andrea Righi
2025-02-07 21:25 ` Tejun Heo
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Changwoo Min @ 2025-02-07 6:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: tj, void, arighi; +Cc: kernel-dev, linux-kernel, Changwoo Min
Modify the scx_qmap and scx_celtral schedulers
to print the SCX_EV_ENQ_SLICE_DFL event every second.
Signed-off-by: Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>
---
tools/sched_ext/scx_central.bpf.c | 2 ++
tools/sched_ext/scx_qmap.bpf.c | 2 ++
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/sched_ext/scx_central.bpf.c b/tools/sched_ext/scx_central.bpf.c
index 376c14d5dd0d..907a844723c1 100644
--- a/tools/sched_ext/scx_central.bpf.c
+++ b/tools/sched_ext/scx_central.bpf.c
@@ -305,6 +305,8 @@ static int central_timerfn(void *map, int *key, struct bpf_timer *timer)
scx_read_event(&events, SCX_EV_DISPATCH_KEEP_LAST));
bpf_printk("%35s: %llu\n", "SCX_EV_ENQ_SKIP_EXITING",
scx_read_event(&events, SCX_EV_ENQ_SKIP_EXITING));
+ bpf_printk("%35s: %llu\n", "SCX_EV_ENQ_SLICE_DFL",
+ scx_read_event(&events, SCX_EV_ENQ_SLICE_DFL));
bpf_printk("%35s: %llu\n", "SCX_EV_BYPASS_DURATION",
scx_read_event(&events, SCX_EV_BYPASS_DURATION));
bpf_printk("%35s: %llu\n", "SCX_EV_BYPASS_DISPATCH",
diff --git a/tools/sched_ext/scx_qmap.bpf.c b/tools/sched_ext/scx_qmap.bpf.c
index 5edb79742e37..7d9d1e5d2358 100644
--- a/tools/sched_ext/scx_qmap.bpf.c
+++ b/tools/sched_ext/scx_qmap.bpf.c
@@ -784,6 +784,8 @@ static int monitor_timerfn(void *map, int *key, struct bpf_timer *timer)
scx_read_event(&events, SCX_EV_DISPATCH_KEEP_LAST));
bpf_printk("%35s: %llu\n", "SCX_EV_ENQ_SKIP_EXITING",
scx_read_event(&events, SCX_EV_ENQ_SKIP_EXITING));
+ bpf_printk("%35s: %llu\n", "SCX_EV_ENQ_SLICE_DFL",
+ scx_read_event(&events, SCX_EV_ENQ_SLICE_DFL));
bpf_printk("%35s: %llu\n", "SCX_EV_BYPASS_DURATION",
scx_read_event(&events, SCX_EV_BYPASS_DURATION));
bpf_printk("%35s: %llu\n", "SCX_EV_BYPASS_DISPATCH",
--
2.48.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] sched_ext: Add a core event and update scx schedulers
2025-02-07 6:40 [PATCH v2 0/2] sched_ext: Add a core event and update scx schedulers Changwoo Min
2025-02-07 6:40 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] sched_ext: Add an event, SCX_EV_ENQ_SLICE_DFL Changwoo Min
2025-02-07 6:40 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] sched_ext: Print an event, SCX_EV_ENQ_SLICE_DFL, in scx_qmap/central Changwoo Min
@ 2025-02-07 6:46 ` Andrea Righi
2025-02-07 21:25 ` Tejun Heo
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Andrea Righi @ 2025-02-07 6:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Changwoo Min; +Cc: tj, void, kernel-dev, linux-kernel
On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 03:40:50PM +0900, Changwoo Min wrote:
> This patchset introduces a new event, SCX_EV_ENQ_SLICE_DFL, and updates
> two scx schedulers -- scx_qmap and scx_central -- to print out the new
> event.
>
> SCX_EV_ENQ_SLICE_DFL counts how many times the tasks' time slice is set
> to the default value (SCX_SLICE_DFL) by the sched_ext core in the enqueue
> and pick_next paths.
>
> Scheduling a task with SCX_SLICE_DFL unintentionally would be a source
> of latency spikes because SCX_SLICE_DFL is relatively long (20 msec).
> Thus, soaring the SCX_EV_ENQ_SLICE_DFL value would be a sign of BPF
> scheduler bugs, causing latency spikes.
Looks good to me, thanks!
Acked-by: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
>
> ChangeLog v1 -> v2:
> - Instrument the event at select_task_rq_scx() when ops.select_cpu()
> is not provided.
>
> Changwoo Min (2):
> sched_ext: Add an event, SCX_EV_ENQ_SLICE_DFL
> sched_ext: Print an event, SCX_EV_ENQ_SLICE_DFL, in scx_qmap/central
>
> kernel/sched/ext.c | 16 +++++++++++++++-
> tools/sched_ext/scx_central.bpf.c | 2 ++
> tools/sched_ext/scx_qmap.bpf.c | 2 ++
> 3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> --
> 2.48.1
>
-Andrea
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread