From: "Gautham R. Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>
To: Dhananjay Ugwekar <dhananjay.ugwekar@amd.com>
Cc: mario.limonciello@amd.com, rafael@kernel.org,
viresh.kumar@linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/12] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Modularize perf<->freq conversion
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2025 15:21:40 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z6nMLKNBkVgYlnNb@BLRRASHENOY1.amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250205112523.201101-8-dhananjay.ugwekar@amd.com>
Hello Dhananjay,
On Wed, Feb 05, 2025 at 11:25:18AM +0000, Dhananjay Ugwekar wrote:
> Delegate the perf<->frequency conversion to helper functions to reduce
> code duplication, and improve readability.
This is better than using the max_freq/max_perf as the baseline since
these values can change when boost is enabled/disabled.
Reviewed-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>
--
Thanks and Regards
gautham.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dhananjay Ugwekar <dhananjay.ugwekar@amd.com>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c
> index dd4f23fa2587..346fac646eba 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c
> @@ -142,6 +142,20 @@ static struct quirk_entry quirk_amd_7k62 = {
> .lowest_freq = 550,
> };
>
> +static inline u8 freq_to_perf(struct amd_cpudata *cpudata, unsigned int freq_val)
> +{
> + u8 perf_val = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL((u64)freq_val * cpudata->nominal_perf,
> + cpudata->nominal_freq);
> +
> + return clamp_t(u8, perf_val, cpudata->lowest_perf, cpudata->highest_perf);
> +}
> +
> +static inline u32 perf_to_freq(struct amd_cpudata *cpudata, u8 perf_val)
> +{
> + return DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL((u64)cpudata->nominal_freq * perf_val,
> + cpudata->nominal_perf);
> +}
> +
> static int __init dmi_matched_7k62_bios_bug(const struct dmi_system_id *dmi)
> {
> /**
> @@ -534,14 +548,12 @@ static inline bool amd_pstate_sample(struct amd_cpudata *cpudata)
> static void amd_pstate_update(struct amd_cpudata *cpudata, u8 min_perf,
> u8 des_perf, u8 max_perf, bool fast_switch, int gov_flags)
> {
> - unsigned long max_freq;
> struct cpufreq_policy *policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpudata->cpu);
> u8 nominal_perf = READ_ONCE(cpudata->nominal_perf);
>
> des_perf = clamp_t(u8, des_perf, min_perf, max_perf);
>
> - max_freq = READ_ONCE(cpudata->max_limit_freq);
> - policy->cur = div_u64(des_perf * max_freq, max_perf);
> + policy->cur = perf_to_freq(cpudata, des_perf);
>
> if ((cppc_state == AMD_PSTATE_GUIDED) && (gov_flags & CPUFREQ_GOV_DYNAMIC_SWITCHING)) {
> min_perf = des_perf;
> @@ -591,14 +603,11 @@ static int amd_pstate_verify(struct cpufreq_policy_data *policy_data)
>
> static int amd_pstate_update_min_max_limit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> {
> - u8 max_limit_perf, min_limit_perf, max_perf;
> - u32 max_freq;
> + u8 max_limit_perf, min_limit_perf;
> struct amd_cpudata *cpudata = policy->driver_data;
>
> - max_perf = READ_ONCE(cpudata->highest_perf);
> - max_freq = READ_ONCE(cpudata->max_freq);
> - max_limit_perf = div_u64(policy->max * max_perf, max_freq);
> - min_limit_perf = div_u64(policy->min * max_perf, max_freq);
> + max_limit_perf = freq_to_perf(cpudata, policy->max);
> + min_limit_perf = freq_to_perf(cpudata, policy->min);
>
> if (cpudata->policy == CPUFREQ_POLICY_PERFORMANCE)
> min_limit_perf = min(cpudata->nominal_perf, max_limit_perf);
> @@ -616,21 +625,15 @@ static int amd_pstate_update_freq(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> {
> struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
> struct amd_cpudata *cpudata = policy->driver_data;
> - u8 des_perf, cap_perf;
> -
> - if (!cpudata->max_freq)
> - return -ENODEV;
> + u8 des_perf;
>
> if (policy->min != cpudata->min_limit_freq || policy->max != cpudata->max_limit_freq)
> amd_pstate_update_min_max_limit(policy);
>
> - cap_perf = READ_ONCE(cpudata->highest_perf);
> -
> freqs.old = policy->cur;
> freqs.new = target_freq;
>
> - des_perf = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(target_freq * cap_perf,
> - cpudata->max_freq);
> + des_perf = freq_to_perf(cpudata, target_freq);
>
> WARN_ON(fast_switch && !policy->fast_switch_enabled);
> /*
> @@ -904,7 +907,6 @@ static int amd_pstate_init_freq(struct amd_cpudata *cpudata)
> {
> int ret;
> u32 min_freq, max_freq;
> - u8 highest_perf, nominal_perf, lowest_nonlinear_perf;
> u32 nominal_freq, lowest_nonlinear_freq;
> struct cppc_perf_caps cppc_perf;
>
> @@ -922,16 +924,17 @@ static int amd_pstate_init_freq(struct amd_cpudata *cpudata)
> else
> nominal_freq = cppc_perf.nominal_freq;
>
> - highest_perf = READ_ONCE(cpudata->highest_perf);
> - nominal_perf = READ_ONCE(cpudata->nominal_perf);
> - max_freq = div_u64((u64)highest_perf * nominal_freq, nominal_perf);
> + min_freq *= 1000;
> + nominal_freq *= 1000;
> +
> + WRITE_ONCE(cpudata->nominal_freq, nominal_freq);
> + WRITE_ONCE(cpudata->min_freq, min_freq);
> +
> + max_freq = perf_to_freq(cpudata, cpudata->highest_perf);
> + lowest_nonlinear_freq = perf_to_freq(cpudata, cpudata->lowest_nonlinear_perf);
>
> - lowest_nonlinear_perf = READ_ONCE(cpudata->lowest_nonlinear_perf);
> - lowest_nonlinear_freq = div_u64((u64)nominal_freq * lowest_nonlinear_perf, nominal_perf);
> - WRITE_ONCE(cpudata->min_freq, min_freq * 1000);
> - WRITE_ONCE(cpudata->lowest_nonlinear_freq, lowest_nonlinear_freq * 1000);
> - WRITE_ONCE(cpudata->nominal_freq, nominal_freq * 1000);
> - WRITE_ONCE(cpudata->max_freq, max_freq * 1000);
> + WRITE_ONCE(cpudata->lowest_nonlinear_freq, lowest_nonlinear_freq);
> + WRITE_ONCE(cpudata->max_freq, max_freq);
>
> /**
> * Below values need to be initialized correctly, otherwise driver will fail to load
> --
> 2.34.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-10 9:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-05 11:25 [PATCH 00/12] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Fixes and optimizations Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-05 11:25 ` [PATCH 01/12] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Remove the goto label in amd_pstate_update_limits Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-05 17:40 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-02-10 5:12 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2025-02-05 11:25 ` [PATCH 02/12] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Fix max_perf updation with schedutil Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-05 17:40 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-02-10 5:13 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2025-02-05 11:25 ` [PATCH 03/12] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Modify the min_perf calculation in adjust_perf callback Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-05 17:45 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-02-10 9:45 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2025-02-05 11:25 ` [PATCH 04/12] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Remove the redundant des_perf clamping in adjust_perf Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-05 17:45 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-02-10 9:46 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2025-02-05 11:25 ` [PATCH 05/12] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Pass min/max_limit_perf as min/max_perf to amd_pstate_update Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-05 17:45 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-02-10 9:47 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2025-02-05 11:25 ` [PATCH 06/12] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Convert all perf values to u8 Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-05 17:46 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-02-10 9:48 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2025-02-05 11:25 ` [PATCH 07/12] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Modularize perf<->freq conversion Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-05 17:46 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-02-10 9:51 ` Gautham R. Shenoy [this message]
2025-02-05 11:25 ` [PATCH 08/12] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Remove the unnecessary cpufreq_update_policy call Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-05 17:46 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-02-10 9:52 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2025-02-05 11:25 ` [PATCH 09/12] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Fix cpufreq_policy ref counting Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-05 17:48 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-02-10 10:52 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2025-02-05 11:25 ` [PATCH 10/12] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Add missing NULL ptr check in amd_pstate_update Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-05 17:48 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-02-10 10:58 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2025-02-05 11:25 ` [PATCH 11/12] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Use scope based cleanup for cpufreq_policy refs Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-05 17:50 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-02-10 11:11 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2025-02-05 11:25 ` [PATCH 12/12] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Remove the unncecessary driver_lock in amd_pstate_update_limits Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-05 17:50 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-02-10 11:12 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z6nMLKNBkVgYlnNb@BLRRASHENOY1.amd.com \
--to=gautham.shenoy@amd.com \
--cc=dhananjay.ugwekar@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.