From: "Gautham R. Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>
To: Dhananjay Ugwekar <dhananjay.ugwekar@amd.com>
Cc: mario.limonciello@amd.com, rafael@kernel.org,
viresh.kumar@linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/12] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Use scope based cleanup for cpufreq_policy refs
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2025 16:41:20 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z6ne2MUPwl5fcxRb@BLRRASHENOY1.amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250205112523.201101-12-dhananjay.ugwekar@amd.com>
On Wed, Feb 05, 2025 at 11:25:22AM +0000, Dhananjay Ugwekar wrote:
> There have been instances in past where refcount decrementing is missed
> while exiting a function. Use automatic scope based cleanup to avoid
> such errors.
This is a nice fix! I wonder if this can be used in other parts
of cpufreq. Did you check if there are other cpufreq drivers/governors
where we can use this destructor?
Other than that,
Reviewed-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>
--
Thanks and Regards
gautham.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dhananjay Ugwekar <dhananjay.ugwekar@amd.com>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c | 25 ++++++++-----------------
> include/linux/cpufreq.h | 3 +++
> 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c
> index 6a604f0797d9..ee7e3f0a4c0a 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c
> @@ -548,7 +548,7 @@ static inline bool amd_pstate_sample(struct amd_cpudata *cpudata)
> static void amd_pstate_update(struct amd_cpudata *cpudata, u8 min_perf,
> u8 des_perf, u8 max_perf, bool fast_switch, int gov_flags)
> {
> - struct cpufreq_policy *policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpudata->cpu);
> + struct cpufreq_policy *policy __free(put_cpufreq_policy) = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpudata->cpu);
> u8 nominal_perf = READ_ONCE(cpudata->nominal_perf);
>
> if (!policy)
> @@ -574,8 +574,6 @@ static void amd_pstate_update(struct amd_cpudata *cpudata, u8 min_perf,
> }
>
> amd_pstate_update_perf(cpudata, min_perf, des_perf, max_perf, 0, fast_switch);
> -
> - cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
> }
>
> static int amd_pstate_verify(struct cpufreq_policy_data *policy_data)
> @@ -587,7 +585,8 @@ static int amd_pstate_verify(struct cpufreq_policy_data *policy_data)
> * amd-pstate qos_requests.
> */
> if (policy_data->min == FREQ_QOS_MIN_DEFAULT_VALUE) {
> - struct cpufreq_policy *policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(policy_data->cpu);
> + struct cpufreq_policy *policy __free(put_cpufreq_policy) =
> + cpufreq_cpu_get(policy_data->cpu);
> struct amd_cpudata *cpudata;
>
> if (!policy)
> @@ -595,7 +594,6 @@ static int amd_pstate_verify(struct cpufreq_policy_data *policy_data)
>
> cpudata = policy->driver_data;
> policy_data->min = cpudata->lowest_nonlinear_freq;
> - cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
> }
>
> cpufreq_verify_within_cpu_limits(policy_data);
> @@ -678,7 +676,7 @@ static void amd_pstate_adjust_perf(unsigned int cpu,
> unsigned long capacity)
> {
> u8 max_perf, min_perf, des_perf, cap_perf, min_limit_perf;
> - struct cpufreq_policy *policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
> + struct cpufreq_policy *policy __free(put_cpufreq_policy) = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
> struct amd_cpudata *cpudata;
>
> if (!policy)
> @@ -710,7 +708,6 @@ static void amd_pstate_adjust_perf(unsigned int cpu,
>
> amd_pstate_update(cpudata, min_perf, des_perf, max_perf, true,
> policy->governor->flags);
> - cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
> }
>
> static int amd_pstate_cpu_boost_update(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, bool on)
> @@ -824,28 +821,23 @@ static void amd_pstate_init_prefcore(struct amd_cpudata *cpudata)
>
> static void amd_pstate_update_limits(unsigned int cpu)
> {
> - struct cpufreq_policy *policy = NULL;
> + struct cpufreq_policy *policy __free(put_cpufreq_policy) = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
> struct amd_cpudata *cpudata;
> u32 prev_high = 0, cur_high = 0;
> - int ret;
> bool highest_perf_changed = false;
>
> if (!amd_pstate_prefcore)
> return;
>
> - policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
> if (!policy)
> return;
>
> - cpudata = policy->driver_data;
> -
> guard(mutex)(&amd_pstate_driver_lock);
>
> - ret = amd_get_highest_perf(cpu, &cur_high);
> - if (ret) {
> - cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
> + if (amd_get_highest_perf(cpu, &cur_high))
> return;
> - }
> +
> + cpudata = policy->driver_data;
>
> prev_high = READ_ONCE(cpudata->prefcore_ranking);
> highest_perf_changed = (prev_high != cur_high);
> @@ -855,7 +847,6 @@ static void amd_pstate_update_limits(unsigned int cpu)
> if (cur_high < CPPC_MAX_PERF)
> sched_set_itmt_core_prio((int)cur_high, cpu);
> }
> - cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
> }
>
> /*
> diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> index 7fe0981a7e46..dde5212d256c 100644
> --- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> +++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> @@ -210,6 +210,9 @@ static inline struct cpufreq_policy *cpufreq_cpu_get(unsigned int cpu)
> static inline void cpufreq_cpu_put(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) { }
> #endif
>
> +/* Scope based cleanup macro for cpufreq_policy kobject reference counting */
> +DEFINE_FREE(put_cpufreq_policy, struct cpufreq_policy *, if (_T) cpufreq_cpu_put(_T))
> +
> static inline bool policy_is_inactive(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> {
> return cpumask_empty(policy->cpus);
> --
> 2.34.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-10 11:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-05 11:25 [PATCH 00/12] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Fixes and optimizations Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-05 11:25 ` [PATCH 01/12] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Remove the goto label in amd_pstate_update_limits Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-05 17:40 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-02-10 5:12 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2025-02-05 11:25 ` [PATCH 02/12] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Fix max_perf updation with schedutil Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-05 17:40 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-02-10 5:13 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2025-02-05 11:25 ` [PATCH 03/12] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Modify the min_perf calculation in adjust_perf callback Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-05 17:45 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-02-10 9:45 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2025-02-05 11:25 ` [PATCH 04/12] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Remove the redundant des_perf clamping in adjust_perf Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-05 17:45 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-02-10 9:46 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2025-02-05 11:25 ` [PATCH 05/12] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Pass min/max_limit_perf as min/max_perf to amd_pstate_update Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-05 17:45 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-02-10 9:47 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2025-02-05 11:25 ` [PATCH 06/12] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Convert all perf values to u8 Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-05 17:46 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-02-10 9:48 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2025-02-05 11:25 ` [PATCH 07/12] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Modularize perf<->freq conversion Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-05 17:46 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-02-10 9:51 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2025-02-05 11:25 ` [PATCH 08/12] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Remove the unnecessary cpufreq_update_policy call Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-05 17:46 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-02-10 9:52 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2025-02-05 11:25 ` [PATCH 09/12] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Fix cpufreq_policy ref counting Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-05 17:48 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-02-10 10:52 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2025-02-05 11:25 ` [PATCH 10/12] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Add missing NULL ptr check in amd_pstate_update Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-05 17:48 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-02-10 10:58 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2025-02-05 11:25 ` [PATCH 11/12] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Use scope based cleanup for cpufreq_policy refs Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-05 17:50 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-02-10 11:11 ` Gautham R. Shenoy [this message]
2025-02-05 11:25 ` [PATCH 12/12] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Remove the unncecessary driver_lock in amd_pstate_update_limits Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-05 17:50 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-02-10 11:12 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z6ne2MUPwl5fcxRb@BLRRASHENOY1.amd.com \
--to=gautham.shenoy@amd.com \
--cc=dhananjay.ugwekar@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.