From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
Cc: catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, oleg@redhat.com,
sstabellini@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org,
luto@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de,
vschneid@redhat.com, kees@kernel.org, wad@chromium.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, samitolvanen@google.com,
masahiroy@kernel.org, hca@linux.ibm.com, aliceryhl@google.com,
rppt@kernel.org, xur@google.com, paulmck@kernel.org,
arnd@arndb.de, mbenes@suse.cz, puranjay@kernel.org,
pcc@google.com, ardb@kernel.org, sudeep.holla@arm.com,
guohanjun@huawei.com, rafael@kernel.org, liuwei09@cestc.cn,
dwmw@amazon.co.uk, Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com,
liaochang1@huawei.com, kristina.martsenko@arm.com,
ptosi@google.com, broonie@kernel.org,
thiago.bauermann@linaro.org, kevin.brodsky@arm.com,
joey.gouly@arm.com, liuyuntao12@huawei.com, leobras@redhat.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next v5 01/22] arm64: ptrace: Replace interrupts_enabled() with regs_irqs_disabled()
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2025 11:04:15 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z6nc_itA5KT1Gk2i@J2N7QTR9R3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241206101744.4161990-2-ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
On Fri, Dec 06, 2024 at 06:17:23PM +0800, Jinjie Ruan wrote:
> The generic entry code expects architecture code to provide
> regs_irqs_disabled(regs) function, but arm64 does not have this and
> provides inerrupts_enabled(regs), which has the opposite polarity.
>
> In preparation for moving arm64 over to the generic entry code,
> relace arm64's interrupts_enabled() with regs_irqs_disabled() and
> update its callers under arch/arm64.
>
> For the moment, a definition of interrupts_enabled() is provided for
> the GICv3 driver. Once arch/arm implement regs_irqs_disabled(), this
> can be removed.
>
> No functional changes.
>
> Suggested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/daifflags.h | 2 +-
> arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h | 7 +++++++
> arch/arm64/include/asm/xen/events.h | 2 +-
> arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c | 2 +-
> arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c | 2 +-
> arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c | 4 ++--
> arch/arm64/kernel/sdei.c | 2 +-
> 7 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/daifflags.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/daifflags.h
> index fbb5c99eb2f9..5fca48009043 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/daifflags.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/daifflags.h
> @@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ static inline void local_daif_inherit(struct pt_regs *regs)
> {
> unsigned long flags = regs->pstate & DAIF_MASK;
>
> - if (interrupts_enabled(regs))
> + if (!regs_irqs_disabled(regs))
> trace_hardirqs_on();
>
> if (system_uses_irq_prio_masking())
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h
> index 47ff8654c5ec..bcfa96880377 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h
> @@ -214,9 +214,16 @@ static inline void forget_syscall(struct pt_regs *regs)
> (regs)->pmr == GIC_PRIO_IRQON : \
> true)
>
> +/*
> + * Used by the GICv3 driver, can be removed once arch/arm implements
> + * regs_irqs_disabled() directly.
> + */
> #define interrupts_enabled(regs) \
> (!((regs)->pstate & PSR_I_BIT) && irqs_priority_unmasked(regs))
>
> +#define regs_irqs_disabled(regs) \
> + (((regs)->pstate & PSR_I_BIT) || (!irqs_priority_unmasked(regs)))
Please make this:
| static __always_inline bool regs_irqs_disabled(const struct pt_regs *regs)
| {
| return (regs->pstate & PSR_I_BIT) || !irqs_priority_unmasked(regs);
| }
|
| #define interrupts_enabled(regs) (!regs_irqs_disabled(regs))
That way this matches the style of x86 and s390, and with
interrupts_enabled() defined in terms of regs_irqs_disabled(), the two
cannot accidentaly diverge.
> #define fast_interrupts_enabled(regs) \
> (!((regs)->pstate & PSR_F_BIT))
We should probably delete this at the same time; it's unused and we
don't want any new users to show up.
With those changes:
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Mark.
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/xen/events.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/xen/events.h
> index 2788e95d0ff0..2977b5fe068d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/xen/events.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/xen/events.h
> @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ enum ipi_vector {
>
> static inline int xen_irqs_disabled(struct pt_regs *regs)
> {
> - return !interrupts_enabled(regs);
> + return regs_irqs_disabled(regs);
> }
>
> #define xchg_xen_ulong(ptr, val) xchg((ptr), (val))
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c
> index e6f66491fbe9..732f89daae23 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c
> @@ -403,7 +403,7 @@ int apei_claim_sea(struct pt_regs *regs)
> return_to_irqs_enabled = !irqs_disabled_flags(arch_local_save_flags());
>
> if (regs)
> - return_to_irqs_enabled = interrupts_enabled(regs);
> + return_to_irqs_enabled = !regs_irqs_disabled(regs);
>
> /*
> * SEA can interrupt SError, mask it and describe this as an NMI so
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c
> index 58f047de3e1c..460c09d03a73 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c
> @@ -231,7 +231,7 @@ static void send_user_sigtrap(int si_code)
> if (WARN_ON(!user_mode(regs)))
> return;
>
> - if (interrupts_enabled(regs))
> + if (!regs_irqs_disabled(regs))
> local_irq_enable();
>
> arm64_force_sig_fault(SIGTRAP, si_code, instruction_pointer(regs),
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c
> index b260ddc4d3e9..c547e70428d3 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c
> @@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ static __always_inline void __exit_to_kernel_mode(struct pt_regs *regs)
> {
> lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled();
>
> - if (interrupts_enabled(regs)) {
> + if (!regs_irqs_disabled(regs)) {
> if (regs->exit_rcu) {
> trace_hardirqs_on_prepare();
> lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare();
> @@ -569,7 +569,7 @@ static void noinstr el1_interrupt(struct pt_regs *regs,
> {
> write_sysreg(DAIF_PROCCTX_NOIRQ, daif);
>
> - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_PSEUDO_NMI) && !interrupts_enabled(regs))
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_PSEUDO_NMI) && regs_irqs_disabled(regs))
> __el1_pnmi(regs, handler);
> else
> __el1_irq(regs, handler);
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/sdei.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/sdei.c
> index 255d12f881c2..27a17da635d8 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/sdei.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/sdei.c
> @@ -247,7 +247,7 @@ unsigned long __kprobes do_sdei_event(struct pt_regs *regs,
> * If we interrupted the kernel with interrupts masked, we always go
> * back to wherever we came from.
> */
> - if (mode == kernel_mode && !interrupts_enabled(regs))
> + if (mode == kernel_mode && regs_irqs_disabled(regs))
> return SDEI_EV_HANDLED;
>
> /*
> --
> 2.34.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-10 11:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-06 10:17 [PATCH -next v5 00/22] arm64: entry: Convert to generic entry Jinjie Ruan
2024-12-06 10:17 ` [PATCH -next v5 01/22] arm64: ptrace: Replace interrupts_enabled() with regs_irqs_disabled() Jinjie Ruan
2025-02-10 11:04 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2024-12-06 10:17 ` [PATCH -next v5 02/22] arm64: entry: Refactor the entry and exit for exceptions from EL1 Jinjie Ruan
2025-02-10 11:08 ` Mark Rutland
2024-12-06 10:17 ` [PATCH -next v5 03/22] arm64: entry: Move arm64_preempt_schedule_irq() into __exit_to_kernel_mode() Jinjie Ruan
2025-02-10 11:26 ` Mark Rutland
2024-12-06 10:17 ` [PATCH -next v5 04/22] arm64: entry: Rework arm64_preempt_schedule_irq() Jinjie Ruan
2025-02-10 11:33 ` Mark Rutland
2024-12-06 10:17 ` [PATCH -next v5 05/22] arm64: entry: Use preempt_count() and need_resched() helper Jinjie Ruan
2025-02-10 11:40 ` Mark Rutland
2024-12-06 10:17 ` [PATCH -next v5 06/22] arm64: entry: Expand the need_irq_preemption() macro ahead Jinjie Ruan
2025-02-10 11:48 ` Mark Rutland
2024-12-06 10:17 ` [PATCH -next v5 07/22] arm64: entry: preempt_schedule_irq() only if PREEMPTION enabled Jinjie Ruan
2025-02-10 11:52 ` Mark Rutland
2024-12-06 10:17 ` [PATCH -next v5 08/22] arm64: entry: Use different helpers to check resched for PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Jinjie Ruan
2025-02-10 11:54 ` Mark Rutland
2024-12-06 10:17 ` [PATCH -next v5 09/22] entry: Split generic entry into irq and syscall Jinjie Ruan
2025-02-10 12:04 ` Mark Rutland
2024-12-06 10:17 ` [PATCH -next v5 10/22] entry: Add arch_irqentry_exit_need_resched() for arm64 Jinjie Ruan
2025-02-10 12:05 ` Mark Rutland
2024-12-06 10:17 ` [PATCH -next v5 11/22] arm64: entry: Switch to generic IRQ entry Jinjie Ruan
2025-02-10 12:24 ` Mark Rutland
2025-02-11 11:32 ` Jinjie Ruan
2024-12-06 10:17 ` [PATCH -next v5 12/22] arm64/ptrace: Split report_syscall() function Jinjie Ruan
2024-12-06 10:17 ` [PATCH -next v5 13/22] arm64/ptrace: Refactor syscall_trace_enter() Jinjie Ruan
2024-12-06 10:17 ` [PATCH -next v5 14/22] arm64/ptrace: Refactor syscall_trace_exit() Jinjie Ruan
2024-12-06 10:17 ` [PATCH -next v5 15/22] arm64/ptrace: Refator el0_svc_common() Jinjie Ruan
2024-12-06 10:17 ` [PATCH -next v5 16/22] entry: Make syscall_exit_to_user_mode_prepare() not static Jinjie Ruan
2024-12-06 10:17 ` [PATCH -next v5 17/22] arm64/ptrace: Return early for ptrace_report_syscall_entry() error Jinjie Ruan
2024-12-06 10:17 ` [PATCH -next v5 18/22] arm64/ptrace: Expand secure_computing() in place Jinjie Ruan
2024-12-06 10:17 ` [PATCH -next v5 19/22] arm64/ptrace: Use syscall_get_arguments() heleper Jinjie Ruan
2024-12-06 10:17 ` [PATCH -next v5 20/22] entry: Add arch_ptrace_report_syscall_entry/exit() Jinjie Ruan
2024-12-06 14:33 ` kernel test robot
2024-12-06 10:17 ` [PATCH -next v5 21/22] entry: Add has_syscall_work() helepr Jinjie Ruan
2024-12-06 10:17 ` [PATCH -next v5 22/22] arm64: entry: Convert to generic entry Jinjie Ruan
2025-02-08 1:15 ` [PATCH -next v5 00/22] " Jinjie Ruan
2025-02-10 12:30 ` Mark Rutland
2025-02-11 11:43 ` Jinjie Ruan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z6nc_itA5KT1Gk2i@J2N7QTR9R3 \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aliceryhl@google.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=dwmw@amazon.co.uk \
--cc=guohanjun@huawei.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=kevin.brodsky@arm.com \
--cc=kristina.martsenko@arm.com \
--cc=leobras@redhat.com \
--cc=liaochang1@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liuwei09@cestc.cn \
--cc=liuyuntao12@huawei.com \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
--cc=mbenes@suse.cz \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=pcc@google.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ptosi@google.com \
--cc=puranjay@kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=ruanjinjie@huawei.com \
--cc=samitolvanen@google.com \
--cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thiago.bauermann@linaro.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=wad@chromium.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
--cc=xur@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.