From: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
To: Pranjal Shrivastava <praan@google.com>
Cc: <jgg@nvidia.com>, <kevin.tian@intel.com>, <corbet@lwn.net>,
<will@kernel.org>, <joro@8bytes.org>,
<suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>, <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
<dwmw2@infradead.org>, <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>,
<shuah@kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<iommu@lists.linux.dev>, <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
<eric.auger@redhat.com>, <jean-philippe@linaro.org>,
<mdf@kernel.org>, <mshavit@google.com>,
<shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>, <smostafa@google.com>,
<ddutile@redhat.com>, <yi.l.liu@intel.com>,
<patches@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 12/14] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Introduce struct arm_smmu_vmaster
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2025 15:45:33 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z70EnQ5CXacc4ysT@Asurada-Nvidia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z7zxsbJsOFp41Dzd@Asurada-Nvidia>
On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 02:24:55PM -0800, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 09:53:58PM +0000, Pranjal Shrivastava wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 01:31:11PM -0800, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 08:35:56PM +0000, Pranjal Shrivastava wrote:
> > > > oN sAt, Feb 22, 2025 at 07:54:09AM -0800, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-iommufd.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-iommufd.c
> > > > > index 5aa2e7af58b4..364d8469a480 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-iommufd.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-iommufd.c
> > > > > @@ -85,6 +85,59 @@ static void arm_smmu_make_nested_domain_ste(
> > > > > }
> > > > > }
> > > > >
> > > > > +int arm_smmu_attach_prepare_vmaster(struct arm_smmu_attach_state *state,
> > > > > + struct iommu_domain *domain)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > + struct arm_smmu_nested_domain *nested_domain;
> > > > > + struct arm_smmu_vmaster *vmaster;
> > > > > + unsigned long vsid;
> > > > > + int ret;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + iommu_group_mutex_assert(state->master->dev);
> > > > > +
> > > > > + if (domain->type != IOMMU_DOMAIN_NESTED)
> > > > > + return 0;
> > > > > + nested_domain = to_smmu_nested_domain(domain);
> > > > > +
> > > > > + /* Skip invalid vSTE */
> > > > > + if (!(nested_domain->ste[0] & cpu_to_le64(STRTAB_STE_0_V)))
> > > > > + return 0;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + ret = iommufd_viommu_get_vdev_id(&nested_domain->vsmmu->core,
> > > > > + state->master->dev, &vsid);
> > > > > + if (ret)
> > > > > + return ret;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + vmaster = kzalloc(sizeof(*vmaster), GFP_KERNEL);
> > > > > + if (!vmaster)
> > > > > + return -ENOMEM;
> > > > > + vmaster->vsmmu = nested_domain->vsmmu;
> > > > > + vmaster->vsid = vsid;
> > > > > + state->vmaster = vmaster;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + return 0;
> > > > > +}
> > > > > +
> > > > > +void arm_smmu_attach_commit_vmaster(struct arm_smmu_attach_state *state)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > + struct arm_smmu_master *master = state->master;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + mutex_lock(&master->smmu->streams_mutex);
> > > > > + if (state->vmaster != master->vmaster) {
> > > > > + kfree(master->vmaster);
> > > > > + master->vmaster = state->vmaster;
> > > > > + }
> > > >
> > > > Does this condition suggest that we might end up calling
> > > > `arm_smmu_attach_prepare_vmaster()` multiple times before __actually__
> > > > commiting to a vmaster?
> > >
> > > No. prepare() and commit() are 1:1. How is it interpreted to have
> > > "multiple times"?
> >
> > Ohh alright. I was just confused about why do we need to check:
> > `if (state->vmaster != master->vmaster)` ?
>
> Hmm, it's probably not necessary, since we always allocate a new
> vmaster pointer to the "state" or set a NULL.
>
> I will clean that up a bit.
I made the following change on top of this patch (will squash):
-------------------------------------------------------------
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-iommufd.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-iommufd.c
index 364d8469a480..2c1a51c360fe 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-iommufd.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-iommufd.c
@@ -95,8 +95,6 @@ int arm_smmu_attach_prepare_vmaster(struct arm_smmu_attach_state *state,
iommu_group_mutex_assert(state->master->dev);
- if (domain->type != IOMMU_DOMAIN_NESTED)
- return 0;
nested_domain = to_smmu_nested_domain(domain);
/* Skip invalid vSTE */
@@ -122,19 +120,9 @@ void arm_smmu_attach_commit_vmaster(struct arm_smmu_attach_state *state)
{
struct arm_smmu_master *master = state->master;
- mutex_lock(&master->smmu->streams_mutex);
- if (state->vmaster != master->vmaster) {
- kfree(master->vmaster);
- master->vmaster = state->vmaster;
- }
- mutex_unlock(&master->smmu->streams_mutex);
-}
-
-void arm_smmu_master_clear_vmaster(struct arm_smmu_master *master)
-{
mutex_lock(&master->smmu->streams_mutex);
kfree(master->vmaster);
- master->vmaster = NULL;
+ master->vmaster = state->vmaster;
mutex_unlock(&master->smmu->streams_mutex);
}
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
index 9e50bcee69d1..b9d0cf571da0 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
@@ -2833,9 +2833,11 @@ int arm_smmu_attach_prepare(struct arm_smmu_attach_state *state,
}
if (smmu_domain) {
- ret = arm_smmu_attach_prepare_vmaster(state, new_domain);
- if (ret)
- return ret;
+ if (new_domain->type == IOMMU_DOMAIN_NESTED) {
+ ret = arm_smmu_attach_prepare_vmaster(state, new_domain);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ }
master_domain = kzalloc(sizeof(*master_domain), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!master_domain) {
@@ -3171,8 +3173,9 @@ static int arm_smmu_attach_dev_identity(struct iommu_domain *domain,
{
struct arm_smmu_ste ste;
struct arm_smmu_master *master = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev);
+ struct arm_smmu_attach_state state = { .master = master };
- arm_smmu_master_clear_vmaster(master);
+ arm_smmu_attach_commit_vmaster(&state);
arm_smmu_make_bypass_ste(master->smmu, &ste);
arm_smmu_attach_dev_ste(domain, dev, &ste, STRTAB_STE_1_S1DSS_BYPASS);
return 0;
@@ -3192,8 +3195,9 @@ static int arm_smmu_attach_dev_blocked(struct iommu_domain *domain,
{
struct arm_smmu_ste ste;
struct arm_smmu_master *master = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev);
+ struct arm_smmu_attach_state state = { .master = master };
- arm_smmu_master_clear_vmaster(master);
+ arm_smmu_attach_commit_vmaster(&state);
arm_smmu_make_abort_ste(&ste);
arm_smmu_attach_dev_ste(domain, dev, &ste,
STRTAB_STE_1_S1DSS_TERMINATE);
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h
index 85352504343b..eeec302f1b4b 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h
@@ -1066,7 +1066,6 @@ struct iommufd_viommu *arm_vsmmu_alloc(struct device *dev,
int arm_smmu_attach_prepare_vmaster(struct arm_smmu_attach_state *state,
struct iommu_domain *domain);
void arm_smmu_attach_commit_vmaster(struct arm_smmu_attach_state *state);
-void arm_smmu_master_clear_vmaster(struct arm_smmu_master *master);
#else
#define arm_smmu_hw_info NULL
#define arm_vsmmu_alloc NULL
@@ -1082,9 +1081,6 @@ static inline void
arm_smmu_attach_commit_vmaster(struct arm_smmu_attach_state *state)
{
}
-static inline void arm_smmu_master_clear_vmaster(struct arm_smmu_master *master)
-{
-}
#endif /* CONFIG_ARM_SMMU_V3_IOMMUFD */
#endif /* _ARM_SMMU_V3_H */
-------------------------------------------------------------
Thanks
Nicolin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-24 23:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-22 15:53 [PATCH v7 00/14] iommufd: Add vIOMMU infrastructure (Part-3: vEVENTQ) Nicolin Chen
2025-02-22 15:53 ` [PATCH v7 01/14] iommufd/fault: Move two fault functions out of the header Nicolin Chen
2025-02-22 15:53 ` [PATCH v7 02/14] iommufd/fault: Add an iommufd_fault_init() helper Nicolin Chen
2025-02-22 15:54 ` [PATCH v7 03/14] iommufd: Abstract an iommufd_eventq from iommufd_fault Nicolin Chen
2025-02-22 15:54 ` [PATCH v7 04/14] iommufd: Rename fault.c to eventq.c Nicolin Chen
2025-02-22 15:54 ` [PATCH v7 05/14] iommufd: Add IOMMUFD_OBJ_VEVENTQ and IOMMUFD_CMD_VEVENTQ_ALLOC Nicolin Chen
2025-02-25 15:29 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-02-22 15:54 ` [PATCH v7 06/14] iommufd/viommu: Add iommufd_viommu_get_vdev_id helper Nicolin Chen
2025-02-22 15:54 ` [PATCH v7 07/14] iommufd/viommu: Add iommufd_viommu_report_event helper Nicolin Chen
2025-02-25 15:40 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-02-22 15:54 ` [PATCH v7 08/14] iommufd/selftest: Require vdev_id when attaching to a nested domain Nicolin Chen
2025-02-22 15:54 ` [PATCH v7 09/14] iommufd/selftest: Add IOMMU_TEST_OP_TRIGGER_VEVENT for vEVENTQ coverage Nicolin Chen
2025-02-22 15:54 ` [PATCH v7 10/14] iommufd/selftest: Add IOMMU_VEVENTQ_ALLOC test coverage Nicolin Chen
2025-02-22 15:54 ` [PATCH v7 11/14] Documentation: userspace-api: iommufd: Update FAULT and VEVENTQ Nicolin Chen
2025-02-22 15:54 ` [PATCH v7 12/14] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Introduce struct arm_smmu_vmaster Nicolin Chen
2025-02-24 20:35 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2025-02-24 21:31 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-02-24 21:53 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2025-02-24 22:24 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-02-24 23:45 ` Nicolin Chen [this message]
2025-02-25 16:02 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-02-25 16:41 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-02-25 17:08 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2025-02-25 17:22 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-02-25 16:45 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2025-02-22 15:54 ` [PATCH v7 13/14] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Report events that belong to devices attached to vIOMMU Nicolin Chen
2025-02-24 21:35 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2025-02-24 21:56 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-02-24 23:35 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-02-25 16:50 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2025-02-25 16:47 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2025-02-25 16:05 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-02-22 15:54 ` [PATCH v7 14/14] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Set MEV bit in nested STE for DoS mitigations Nicolin Chen
2025-02-24 4:38 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z70EnQ5CXacc4ysT@Asurada-Nvidia \
--to=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=ddutile@redhat.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mdf@kernel.org \
--cc=mshavit@google.com \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=praan@google.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=smostafa@google.com \
--cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.