From: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
To: Pranjal Shrivastava <praan@google.com>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>, <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
<corbet@lwn.net>, <will@kernel.org>, <joro@8bytes.org>,
<suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>, <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
<dwmw2@infradead.org>, <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>,
<shuah@kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<iommu@lists.linux.dev>, <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
<eric.auger@redhat.com>, <jean-philippe@linaro.org>,
<mdf@kernel.org>, <mshavit@google.com>,
<shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>, <smostafa@google.com>,
<ddutile@redhat.com>, <yi.l.liu@intel.com>,
<patches@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 12/14] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Introduce struct arm_smmu_vmaster
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2025 09:22:12 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z738RHVFhgCmxoIx@Asurada-Nvidia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z735AMlhP29YEndU@google.com>
On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 05:08:16PM +0000, Pranjal Shrivastava wrote:
> > @@ -824,6 +829,9 @@ struct arm_smmu_master {
> > struct arm_smmu_device *smmu;
> > struct device *dev;
> > struct arm_smmu_stream *streams;
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_SMMU_V3_IOMMUFD
> > + struct arm_smmu_vmaster *vmaster; /* use smmu->streams_mutex */
> > +#endif
> > /* Locked by the iommu core using the group mutex */
> > struct arm_smmu_ctx_desc_cfg cd_table;
> > unsigned int num_streams;
> > @@ -972,6 +980,9 @@ struct arm_smmu_attach_state {
> > bool disable_ats;
> > ioasid_t ssid;
> > /* Resulting state */
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_SMMU_V3_IOMMUFD
> > + struct arm_smmu_vmaster *vmaster;
> > +#endif
> > bool ats_enabled;
> > };
> >
>
> Umm.. I'm not too sure how I feel about these #ifdefs _between_ a struct
> definition. Given that currently, the arm_smmu_v3.h file doesn't have
> such `#ifdef CONFIG`s between structs. I'd say, in case
> CONFIG_ARM_SMMU_V3_IOMMUFD is turned off, we can simply leave the
> vmaster ptr NULL?
OK. Will drop..
Nicolin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-25 17:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-22 15:53 [PATCH v7 00/14] iommufd: Add vIOMMU infrastructure (Part-3: vEVENTQ) Nicolin Chen
2025-02-22 15:53 ` [PATCH v7 01/14] iommufd/fault: Move two fault functions out of the header Nicolin Chen
2025-02-22 15:53 ` [PATCH v7 02/14] iommufd/fault: Add an iommufd_fault_init() helper Nicolin Chen
2025-02-22 15:54 ` [PATCH v7 03/14] iommufd: Abstract an iommufd_eventq from iommufd_fault Nicolin Chen
2025-02-22 15:54 ` [PATCH v7 04/14] iommufd: Rename fault.c to eventq.c Nicolin Chen
2025-02-22 15:54 ` [PATCH v7 05/14] iommufd: Add IOMMUFD_OBJ_VEVENTQ and IOMMUFD_CMD_VEVENTQ_ALLOC Nicolin Chen
2025-02-25 15:29 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-02-22 15:54 ` [PATCH v7 06/14] iommufd/viommu: Add iommufd_viommu_get_vdev_id helper Nicolin Chen
2025-02-22 15:54 ` [PATCH v7 07/14] iommufd/viommu: Add iommufd_viommu_report_event helper Nicolin Chen
2025-02-25 15:40 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-02-22 15:54 ` [PATCH v7 08/14] iommufd/selftest: Require vdev_id when attaching to a nested domain Nicolin Chen
2025-02-22 15:54 ` [PATCH v7 09/14] iommufd/selftest: Add IOMMU_TEST_OP_TRIGGER_VEVENT for vEVENTQ coverage Nicolin Chen
2025-02-22 15:54 ` [PATCH v7 10/14] iommufd/selftest: Add IOMMU_VEVENTQ_ALLOC test coverage Nicolin Chen
2025-02-22 15:54 ` [PATCH v7 11/14] Documentation: userspace-api: iommufd: Update FAULT and VEVENTQ Nicolin Chen
2025-02-22 15:54 ` [PATCH v7 12/14] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Introduce struct arm_smmu_vmaster Nicolin Chen
2025-02-24 20:35 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2025-02-24 21:31 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-02-24 21:53 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2025-02-24 22:24 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-02-24 23:45 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-02-25 16:02 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-02-25 16:41 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-02-25 17:08 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2025-02-25 17:22 ` Nicolin Chen [this message]
2025-02-25 16:45 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2025-02-22 15:54 ` [PATCH v7 13/14] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Report events that belong to devices attached to vIOMMU Nicolin Chen
2025-02-24 21:35 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2025-02-24 21:56 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-02-24 23:35 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-02-25 16:50 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2025-02-25 16:47 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2025-02-25 16:05 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-02-22 15:54 ` [PATCH v7 14/14] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Set MEV bit in nested STE for DoS mitigations Nicolin Chen
2025-02-24 4:38 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z738RHVFhgCmxoIx@Asurada-Nvidia \
--to=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=ddutile@redhat.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mdf@kernel.org \
--cc=mshavit@google.com \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=praan@google.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=smostafa@google.com \
--cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.