* [PATCH sched_ext/for-6.14-fixes] sched_ext: Fix pick_task_scx() picking non-queued tasks when it's called without balance()
@ 2025-02-25 16:02 Tejun Heo
2025-02-25 17:14 ` Andrea Righi
2025-02-25 18:30 ` Tejun Heo
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Tejun Heo @ 2025-02-25 16:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Vernet, Andrea Righi, Changwoo Min; +Cc: linux-kernel, sched-ext
a6250aa251ea ("sched_ext: Handle cases where pick_task_scx() is called
without preceding balance_scx()") added a workaround to handle the cases
where pick_task_scx() is called without prececing balance_scx() which is due
to a fair class bug where pick_taks_fair() may return NULL after a true
return from balance_fair().
The workaround detects when pick_task_scx() is called without preceding
balance_scx() and emulates SCX_RQ_BAL_KEEP and triggers kicking to avoid
stalling. Unfortunately, the workaround code was testing whether @prev was
on SCX to decide whether to keep the task running. This is incorrect as the
task may be on SCX but no longer runnable.
This could lead to a non-runnable task to be returned from pick_task_scx()
which cause interesting confusions and failures. e.g. A common failure mode
is the task ending up with (!on_rq && on_cpu) state which can cause
potential wakers to busy loop, which can easily lead to deadlocks.
Fix it by testing whether @prev has SCX_TASK_QUEUED set. This makes
$prev_on_scx only used in one place. Open code the usage and improve the
comment while at it.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Reported-by: Pat Cody <patcody@meta.com>
Fixes: a6250aa251ea ("sched_ext: Handle cases where pick_task_scx() is called without preceding balance_scx()")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v6.12+
---
kernel/sched/ext.c | 11 +++++++----
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext.c b/kernel/sched/ext.c
index 5a81d9a1e31f..0f1da199cfc7 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/ext.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/ext.c
@@ -3117,7 +3117,6 @@ static struct task_struct *pick_task_scx(struct rq *rq)
{
struct task_struct *prev = rq->curr;
struct task_struct *p;
- bool prev_on_scx = prev->sched_class == &ext_sched_class;
bool keep_prev = rq->scx.flags & SCX_RQ_BAL_KEEP;
bool kick_idle = false;
@@ -3137,14 +3136,18 @@ static struct task_struct *pick_task_scx(struct rq *rq)
* if pick_task_scx() is called without preceding balance_scx().
*/
if (unlikely(rq->scx.flags & SCX_RQ_BAL_PENDING)) {
- if (prev_on_scx) {
+ if (prev->scx.flags & SCX_TASK_QUEUED) {
keep_prev = true;
} else {
keep_prev = false;
kick_idle = true;
}
- } else if (unlikely(keep_prev && !prev_on_scx)) {
- /* only allowed during transitions */
+ } else if (unlikely(keep_prev &&
+ prev->sched_class != &ext_sched_class)) {
+ /*
+ * Can happen while enabling as SCX_RQ_BAL_PENDING assertion is
+ * conditional on scx_enabled() and may have been skipped.
+ */
WARN_ON_ONCE(scx_ops_enable_state() == SCX_OPS_ENABLED);
keep_prev = false;
}
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH sched_ext/for-6.14-fixes] sched_ext: Fix pick_task_scx() picking non-queued tasks when it's called without balance()
2025-02-25 16:02 [PATCH sched_ext/for-6.14-fixes] sched_ext: Fix pick_task_scx() picking non-queued tasks when it's called without balance() Tejun Heo
@ 2025-02-25 17:14 ` Andrea Righi
2025-02-25 17:45 ` Tejun Heo
2025-02-25 18:30 ` Tejun Heo
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Andrea Righi @ 2025-02-25 17:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tejun Heo; +Cc: David Vernet, Changwoo Min, linux-kernel, sched-ext
On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 06:02:23AM -1000, Tejun Heo wrote:
> a6250aa251ea ("sched_ext: Handle cases where pick_task_scx() is called
> without preceding balance_scx()") added a workaround to handle the cases
> where pick_task_scx() is called without prececing balance_scx() which is due
> to a fair class bug where pick_taks_fair() may return NULL after a true
> return from balance_fair().
>
> The workaround detects when pick_task_scx() is called without preceding
> balance_scx() and emulates SCX_RQ_BAL_KEEP and triggers kicking to avoid
> stalling. Unfortunately, the workaround code was testing whether @prev was
> on SCX to decide whether to keep the task running. This is incorrect as the
> task may be on SCX but no longer runnable.
>
> This could lead to a non-runnable task to be returned from pick_task_scx()
> which cause interesting confusions and failures. e.g. A common failure mode
> is the task ending up with (!on_rq && on_cpu) state which can cause
> potential wakers to busy loop, which can easily lead to deadlocks.
>
> Fix it by testing whether @prev has SCX_TASK_QUEUED set. This makes
> $prev_on_scx only used in one place. Open code the usage and improve the
nit: @prev_on_scx?
> comment while at it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
> Reported-by: Pat Cody <patcody@meta.com>
> Fixes: a6250aa251ea ("sched_ext: Handle cases where pick_task_scx() is called without preceding balance_scx()")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v6.12+
Makes sense to me.
Acked-by: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
Thanks,
-Andrea
> ---
> kernel/sched/ext.c | 11 +++++++----
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext.c b/kernel/sched/ext.c
> index 5a81d9a1e31f..0f1da199cfc7 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/ext.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/ext.c
> @@ -3117,7 +3117,6 @@ static struct task_struct *pick_task_scx(struct rq *rq)
> {
> struct task_struct *prev = rq->curr;
> struct task_struct *p;
> - bool prev_on_scx = prev->sched_class == &ext_sched_class;
> bool keep_prev = rq->scx.flags & SCX_RQ_BAL_KEEP;
> bool kick_idle = false;
>
> @@ -3137,14 +3136,18 @@ static struct task_struct *pick_task_scx(struct rq *rq)
> * if pick_task_scx() is called without preceding balance_scx().
> */
> if (unlikely(rq->scx.flags & SCX_RQ_BAL_PENDING)) {
> - if (prev_on_scx) {
> + if (prev->scx.flags & SCX_TASK_QUEUED) {
> keep_prev = true;
> } else {
> keep_prev = false;
> kick_idle = true;
> }
> - } else if (unlikely(keep_prev && !prev_on_scx)) {
> - /* only allowed during transitions */
> + } else if (unlikely(keep_prev &&
> + prev->sched_class != &ext_sched_class)) {
> + /*
> + * Can happen while enabling as SCX_RQ_BAL_PENDING assertion is
> + * conditional on scx_enabled() and may have been skipped.
> + */
> WARN_ON_ONCE(scx_ops_enable_state() == SCX_OPS_ENABLED);
> keep_prev = false;
> }
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH sched_ext/for-6.14-fixes] sched_ext: Fix pick_task_scx() picking non-queued tasks when it's called without balance()
2025-02-25 17:14 ` Andrea Righi
@ 2025-02-25 17:45 ` Tejun Heo
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Tejun Heo @ 2025-02-25 17:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrea Righi; +Cc: David Vernet, Changwoo Min, linux-kernel, sched-ext
On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 06:14:15PM +0100, Andrea Righi wrote:
> > Fix it by testing whether @prev has SCX_TASK_QUEUED set. This makes
> > $prev_on_scx only used in one place. Open code the usage and improve the
>
> nit: @prev_on_scx?
Yeah, I don't know. Some people use @ only for arguments and $ for
variables. Others always use @. I flip flop between them.
Thanks.
--
tejun
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH sched_ext/for-6.14-fixes] sched_ext: Fix pick_task_scx() picking non-queued tasks when it's called without balance()
2025-02-25 16:02 [PATCH sched_ext/for-6.14-fixes] sched_ext: Fix pick_task_scx() picking non-queued tasks when it's called without balance() Tejun Heo
2025-02-25 17:14 ` Andrea Righi
@ 2025-02-25 18:30 ` Tejun Heo
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Tejun Heo @ 2025-02-25 18:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Vernet, Andrea Righi, Changwoo Min; +Cc: linux-kernel, sched-ext
On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 06:02:23AM -1000, Tejun Heo wrote:
> a6250aa251ea ("sched_ext: Handle cases where pick_task_scx() is called
> without preceding balance_scx()") added a workaround to handle the cases
> where pick_task_scx() is called without prececing balance_scx() which is due
> to a fair class bug where pick_taks_fair() may return NULL after a true
> return from balance_fair().
>
> The workaround detects when pick_task_scx() is called without preceding
> balance_scx() and emulates SCX_RQ_BAL_KEEP and triggers kicking to avoid
> stalling. Unfortunately, the workaround code was testing whether @prev was
> on SCX to decide whether to keep the task running. This is incorrect as the
> task may be on SCX but no longer runnable.
>
> This could lead to a non-runnable task to be returned from pick_task_scx()
> which cause interesting confusions and failures. e.g. A common failure mode
> is the task ending up with (!on_rq && on_cpu) state which can cause
> potential wakers to busy loop, which can easily lead to deadlocks.
>
> Fix it by testing whether @prev has SCX_TASK_QUEUED set. This makes
> $prev_on_scx only used in one place. Open code the usage and improve the
> comment while at it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
> Reported-by: Pat Cody <patcody@meta.com>
> Fixes: a6250aa251ea ("sched_ext: Handle cases where pick_task_scx() is called without preceding balance_scx()")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v6.12+
Applied to sched_ext/for-6.14-fixes.
Thanks.
--
tejun
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-02-25 18:30 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-02-25 16:02 [PATCH sched_ext/for-6.14-fixes] sched_ext: Fix pick_task_scx() picking non-queued tasks when it's called without balance() Tejun Heo
2025-02-25 17:14 ` Andrea Righi
2025-02-25 17:45 ` Tejun Heo
2025-02-25 18:30 ` Tejun Heo
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.