From: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
To: John Meneghini <jmeneghi@redhat.com>
Cc: hch@lst.de, sagi@grimberg.me, bmarzins@redhat.com,
Bryan Gurney <bgurney@redhat.com>,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Marco Patalano <mpatalan@redhat.com>,
axboe@kernel.dk
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvme: remove multipath module parameter
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2025 08:06:35 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z7Sh-3yHbXVmRbNL@kbusch-mbp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7c588344-f019-4939-8a93-0a450481d4bc@redhat.com>
On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 03:37:28PM -0500, John Meneghini wrote:
> Keith, Christoph and Sagi,
>
> This patch has been fully tested and analyzed by Red Hat's QA group and no
> unexpected side effects or regressions have been found. Both NVMe/FC and NVMe/TCP
> have been tested. Our QE engineer has asked me to report this upstream.
What's the harm in leaving the parameter? *I* use it so I can test both
ways without needing to compile multiple kernels.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-18 15:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-04 21:11 [PATCH] nvme: remove multipath module parameter Bryan Gurney
2025-02-13 20:37 ` John Meneghini
2025-02-17 8:08 ` Sagi Grimberg
2025-02-17 16:14 ` John Meneghini
2025-02-18 8:19 ` Sagi Grimberg
2025-02-18 14:05 ` John Meneghini
2025-02-18 14:57 ` John Meneghini
2025-02-18 15:06 ` Keith Busch [this message]
2025-02-18 16:31 ` John Meneghini
2025-02-18 17:15 ` Keith Busch
2025-02-18 23:06 ` John Meneghini
2025-02-18 23:30 ` Keith Busch
2025-02-19 14:47 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-02-20 11:05 ` Sagi Grimberg
2025-02-20 16:47 ` Keith Busch
2025-02-26 9:55 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-03-05 14:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-05 15:17 ` Keith Busch
2025-03-05 23:51 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-05 23:57 ` Keith Busch
2025-03-06 0:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-06 0:15 ` Keith Busch
2025-03-06 7:12 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-03-06 14:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-06 15:01 ` Keith Busch
2025-03-06 15:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-07 0:46 ` Keith Busch
2025-03-07 15:19 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-03-07 15:43 ` Keith Busch
2025-03-09 17:23 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-03-10 13:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-12 3:47 ` John Meneghini
2025-03-12 15:26 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-03-10 13:28 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-12 3:08 ` John Meneghini
2025-02-18 14:26 ` John Meneghini
2025-02-18 16:41 ` John Meneghini
2025-02-18 14:43 ` John Meneghini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z7Sh-3yHbXVmRbNL@kbusch-mbp \
--to=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bgurney@redhat.com \
--cc=bmarzins@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jmeneghi@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mpatalan@redhat.com \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.