All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linux-csky@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, loongarch@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/ioremap: Pass pgprot_t to ioremap_prot() instead of unsigned long
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2025 11:52:01 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z7XF4Y3FIbSrSP9u@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250218101954.415331-1-anshuman.khandual@arm.com>

On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 03:49:54PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> From: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
> 
> ioremap_prot() currently accepts pgprot_val parameter as an unsigned long,
> thus implicitly assuming that pgprot_val and pgprot_t could never be bigger
> than unsigned long. But this assumption soon will not be true on arm64 when
> using D128 pgtables. In 128 bit page table configuration, unsigned long is
> 64 bit, but pgprot_t is 128 bit.
> 
> Passing platform abstracted pgprot_t argument is better as compared to size
> based data types. Let's change the parameter to directly pass pgprot_t like
> another similar helper generic_ioremap_prot().
> 
> Without this change in place, D128 configuration does not work on arm64 as
> the top 64 bits gets silently stripped when passing the protection value to
> this function.
> 
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> Cc: linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org
> Cc: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
> Cc: linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-csky@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-mips@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: loongarch@lists.linux.dev
> Cc: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
> Co-developed-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>

For arm64:

Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linux-csky@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, loongarch@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/ioremap: Pass pgprot_t to ioremap_prot() instead of unsigned long
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2025 11:52:01 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z7XF4Y3FIbSrSP9u@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250218101954.415331-1-anshuman.khandual@arm.com>

On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 03:49:54PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> From: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
> 
> ioremap_prot() currently accepts pgprot_val parameter as an unsigned long,
> thus implicitly assuming that pgprot_val and pgprot_t could never be bigger
> than unsigned long. But this assumption soon will not be true on arm64 when
> using D128 pgtables. In 128 bit page table configuration, unsigned long is
> 64 bit, but pgprot_t is 128 bit.
> 
> Passing platform abstracted pgprot_t argument is better as compared to size
> based data types. Let's change the parameter to directly pass pgprot_t like
> another similar helper generic_ioremap_prot().
> 
> Without this change in place, D128 configuration does not work on arm64 as
> the top 64 bits gets silently stripped when passing the protection value to
> this function.
> 
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> Cc: linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org
> Cc: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
> Cc: linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-csky@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-mips@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: loongarch@lists.linux.dev
> Cc: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
> Co-developed-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>

For arm64:

Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linux-csky@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, loongarch@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/ioremap: Pass pgprot_t to ioremap_prot() instead of unsigned long
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2025 11:52:01 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z7XF4Y3FIbSrSP9u@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250218101954.415331-1-anshuman.khandual@arm.com>

On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 03:49:54PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> From: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
> 
> ioremap_prot() currently accepts pgprot_val parameter as an unsigned long,
> thus implicitly assuming that pgprot_val and pgprot_t could never be bigger
> than unsigned long. But this assumption soon will not be true on arm64 when
> using D128 pgtables. In 128 bit page table configuration, unsigned long is
> 64 bit, but pgprot_t is 128 bit.
> 
> Passing platform abstracted pgprot_t argument is better as compared to size
> based data types. Let's change the parameter to directly pass pgprot_t like
> another similar helper generic_ioremap_prot().
> 
> Without this change in place, D128 configuration does not work on arm64 as
> the top 64 bits gets silently stripped when passing the protection value to
> this function.
> 
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> Cc: linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org
> Cc: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
> Cc: linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-csky@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-mips@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: loongarch@lists.linux.dev
> Cc: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
> Co-developed-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>

For arm64:

Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

_______________________________________________
linux-snps-arc mailing list
linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc

  reply	other threads:[~2025-02-19 11:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-18 10:19 [PATCH] mm/ioremap: Pass pgprot_t to ioremap_prot() instead of unsigned long Anshuman Khandual
2025-02-18 10:19 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-02-18 10:19 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-02-19 11:52 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2025-02-19 11:52   ` Catalin Marinas
2025-02-19 11:52   ` Catalin Marinas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z7XF4Y3FIbSrSP9u@arm.com \
    --to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-csky@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=loongarch@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.