All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Charlie Jenkins <charlie@rivosinc.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
	WANG Xuerui <kernel@xen0n.name>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@rivosinc.com>,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	loongarch@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/4] entry: Inline syscall_exit_to_user_mode()
Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2025 21:34:00 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z85ruFUoBQM60Vd8@ghost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87jz8y3953.ffs@tglx>

On Sun, Mar 09, 2025 at 09:23:20AM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 08 2025 at 16:08, Charlie Jenkins wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 08, 2025 at 01:37:30PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> >> On Wed, Mar 05 2025 at 16:43, Charlie Jenkins wrote:
> >> > Architectures using the generic entry code can be optimized by having
> >> > syscall_exit_to_user_mode inlined.
> >> 
> >> That's a pretty handwavy claim. What's the actual benefit in numbers?
> >
> > I put the numbers in the cover letter! Here is the data I gathered:
> 
> They should be in the change log as the cover letter is not part of what
> ends up in git.

Yes good point. I will add this data here in the next version of the patch.

- Charlie


_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Charlie Jenkins <charlie@rivosinc.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
	WANG Xuerui <kernel@xen0n.name>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@rivosinc.com>,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	loongarch@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/4] entry: Inline syscall_exit_to_user_mode()
Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2025 21:34:00 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z85ruFUoBQM60Vd8@ghost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87jz8y3953.ffs@tglx>

On Sun, Mar 09, 2025 at 09:23:20AM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 08 2025 at 16:08, Charlie Jenkins wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 08, 2025 at 01:37:30PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> >> On Wed, Mar 05 2025 at 16:43, Charlie Jenkins wrote:
> >> > Architectures using the generic entry code can be optimized by having
> >> > syscall_exit_to_user_mode inlined.
> >> 
> >> That's a pretty handwavy claim. What's the actual benefit in numbers?
> >
> > I put the numbers in the cover letter! Here is the data I gathered:
> 
> They should be in the change log as the cover letter is not part of what
> ends up in git.

Yes good point. I will add this data here in the next version of the patch.

- Charlie


  reply	other threads:[~2025-03-10  4:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-06  0:43 [PATCH v5 0/4] entry: Move ret_from_fork() to C and inline syscall_exit_to_user_mode() Charlie Jenkins
2025-03-06  0:43 ` Charlie Jenkins
2025-03-06  0:43 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] riscv: entry: Convert ret_from_fork() to C Charlie Jenkins
2025-03-06  0:43   ` Charlie Jenkins
2025-03-06  0:43 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] riscv: entry: Split ret_from_fork() into user and kernel Charlie Jenkins
2025-03-06  0:43   ` Charlie Jenkins
2025-03-10  9:51   ` Alexandre Ghiti
2025-03-10  9:51     ` Alexandre Ghiti
2025-03-06  0:43 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] LoongArch: entry: Migrate ret_from_fork() to C Charlie Jenkins
2025-03-06  0:43   ` Charlie Jenkins
2025-03-06  0:43 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] entry: Inline syscall_exit_to_user_mode() Charlie Jenkins
2025-03-06  0:43   ` Charlie Jenkins
2025-03-08 12:37   ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-03-08 12:37     ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-03-09  0:08     ` Charlie Jenkins
2025-03-09  0:08       ` Charlie Jenkins
2025-03-09  8:23       ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-03-09  8:23         ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-03-10  4:34         ` Charlie Jenkins [this message]
2025-03-10  4:34           ` Charlie Jenkins
2025-03-10  9:58   ` Alexandre Ghiti
2025-03-10  9:58     ` Alexandre Ghiti

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z85ruFUoBQM60Vd8@ghost \
    --to=charlie@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=alexghiti@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
    --cc=kernel@xen0n.name \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=loongarch@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.