From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip] x86/locking/atomic: Use asm_inline for atomic locking insns
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2025 21:21:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z8iyWHyYt6bfo_mO@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFULd4bDSh7fzm8xmMzn0YzF0pr=mLvzb9dVYhCajyXx=XBrtA@mail.gmail.com>
* Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com> wrote:
> I simply run the lmbench command, where the benchmark was obtained as
> .rpm for Fedora 41 [1], assuming that the benchmark itself sets the
> benchmarked system to the correct state and does enough repetitions
> to obtain a meaningful result [2].
These assumptions are not valid in a lot of cases - see my other email
with an example.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-05 20:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-28 12:35 [PATCH -tip] x86/locking/atomic: Use asm_inline for atomic locking insns Uros Bizjak
2025-02-28 13:13 ` Uros Bizjak
2025-02-28 16:48 ` Dave Hansen
2025-02-28 22:31 ` Uros Bizjak
2025-02-28 22:58 ` Dave Hansen
2025-03-01 9:05 ` Uros Bizjak
2025-03-01 12:38 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-03-05 8:54 ` Uros Bizjak
2025-03-05 17:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-03-05 19:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-03-05 19:47 ` Uros Bizjak
2025-03-05 22:18 ` David Laight
2025-03-05 20:14 ` David Laight
2025-03-06 10:45 ` Uros Bizjak
2025-03-06 13:07 ` Uros Bizjak
2025-03-06 22:19 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-03-08 7:22 ` Uros Bizjak
2025-03-08 19:15 ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-03-05 19:55 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-03-05 20:13 ` Uros Bizjak
2025-03-05 20:21 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2025-03-06 9:38 ` Uros Bizjak
2025-03-05 20:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-03-06 10:52 ` Dirk Gouders
2025-03-06 10:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-03-05 20:36 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-03-05 21:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-03-06 9:01 ` Uros Bizjak
2025-03-06 9:43 ` kernel: Current status of CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE=y (was: Re: [PATCH -tip] x86/locking/atomic: Use asm_inline for atomic locking insns) Ingo Molnar
2025-03-06 10:37 ` Arnd Bergmann
2025-03-06 20:37 ` David Laight
2025-03-03 13:12 ` [PATCH -tip] x86/locking/atomic: Use asm_inline for atomic locking insns David Laight
2025-03-02 20:56 ` Uros Bizjak
2025-03-03 12:23 ` Uros Bizjak
2025-03-08 19:08 ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-03-09 7:50 ` Uros Bizjak
2025-03-09 9:46 ` David Laight
2025-03-09 9:57 ` Uros Bizjak
2025-03-06 9:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-03-06 10:26 ` Uros Bizjak
2025-03-06 10:38 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-03-06 10:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-03-06 13:56 ` Uros Bizjak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z8iyWHyYt6bfo_mO@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=ubizjak@gmail.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.