All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Kubiak <michal.kubiak@intel.com>
To: Stefan Assmann <sassmann@kpanic.de>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com,
	intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, patryk.piotrowski@intel.com,
	slawomirx.laba@intel.com
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net v2] iavf: fix hang on reboot with ice
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2023 15:24:04 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZBCDhCjim+d4TmMD@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230313160645.3332457-1-sassmann@kpanic.de>

On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 05:06:45PM +0100, Stefan Assmann wrote:
> When a system with E810 with existing VFs gets rebooted the following
> hang may be observed.
> 
>  Pid 1 is hung in iavf_remove(), part of a network driver:
>  PID: 1        TASK: ffff965400e5a340  CPU: 24   COMMAND: "systemd-shutdow"
>   #0 [ffffaad04005fa50] __schedule at ffffffff8b3239cb
>   #1 [ffffaad04005fae8] schedule at ffffffff8b323e2d
>   #2 [ffffaad04005fb00] schedule_hrtimeout_range_clock at ffffffff8b32cebc
>   #3 [ffffaad04005fb80] usleep_range_state at ffffffff8b32c930
>   #4 [ffffaad04005fbb0] iavf_remove at ffffffffc12b9b4c [iavf]
>   #5 [ffffaad04005fbf0] pci_device_remove at ffffffff8add7513
>   #6 [ffffaad04005fc10] device_release_driver_internal at ffffffff8af08baa
>   #7 [ffffaad04005fc40] pci_stop_bus_device at ffffffff8adcc5fc
>   #8 [ffffaad04005fc60] pci_stop_and_remove_bus_device at ffffffff8adcc81e
>   #9 [ffffaad04005fc70] pci_iov_remove_virtfn at ffffffff8adf9429
>  #10 [ffffaad04005fca8] sriov_disable at ffffffff8adf98e4
>  #11 [ffffaad04005fcc8] ice_free_vfs at ffffffffc04bb2c8 [ice]
>  #12 [ffffaad04005fd10] ice_remove at ffffffffc04778fe [ice]
>  #13 [ffffaad04005fd38] ice_shutdown at ffffffffc0477946 [ice]
>  #14 [ffffaad04005fd50] pci_device_shutdown at ffffffff8add58f1
>  #15 [ffffaad04005fd70] device_shutdown at ffffffff8af05386
>  #16 [ffffaad04005fd98] kernel_restart at ffffffff8a92a870
>  #17 [ffffaad04005fda8] __do_sys_reboot at ffffffff8a92abd6
>  #18 [ffffaad04005fee0] do_syscall_64 at ffffffff8b317159
>  #19 [ffffaad04005ff08] __context_tracking_enter at ffffffff8b31b6fc
>  #20 [ffffaad04005ff18] syscall_exit_to_user_mode at ffffffff8b31b50d
>  #21 [ffffaad04005ff28] do_syscall_64 at ffffffff8b317169
>  #22 [ffffaad04005ff50] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe at ffffffff8b40009b
>      RIP: 00007f1baa5c13d7  RSP: 00007fffbcc55a98  RFLAGS: 00000202
>      RAX: ffffffffffffffda  RBX: 0000000000000000  RCX: 00007f1baa5c13d7
>      RDX: 0000000001234567  RSI: 0000000028121969  RDI: 00000000fee1dead
>      RBP: 00007fffbcc55ca0   R8: 0000000000000000   R9: 00007fffbcc54e90
>      R10: 00007fffbcc55050  R11: 0000000000000202  R12: 0000000000000005
>      R13: 0000000000000000  R14: 00007fffbcc55af0  R15: 0000000000000000
>      ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000a9  CS: 0033  SS: 002b
> 
> During reboot all drivers PM shutdown callbacks are invoked.
> In iavf_shutdown() the adapter state is changed to __IAVF_REMOVE.
> In ice_shutdown() the call chain above is executed, which at some point
> calls iavf_remove(). However iavf_remove() expects the VF to be in one
> of the states __IAVF_RUNNING, __IAVF_DOWN or __IAVF_INIT_FAILED. If
> that's not the case it sleeps forever.
> So if iavf_shutdown() gets invoked before iavf_remove() the system will
> hang indefinitely because the adapter is already in state __IAVF_REMOVE.
> 
> Fix this by returning from iavf_remove() if the state is __IAVF_REMOVE,
> as we already went through iavf_shutdown().
> 
> Fixes: 974578017fc1 ("iavf: Add waiting so the port is initialized in remove")
> Fixes: a8417330f8a5 ("iavf: Fix race condition between iavf_shutdown and iavf_remove")
> Reported-by: Marius Cornea <mcornea@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Assmann <sassmann@kpanic.de>
> ---
> v2: return instead of breaking the while (1) loop
>     This avoids going through remove code twice and is how things worked
>     before a8417330f8a5.

Good catch. Indeed there was such a logic before that patch.

Thanks,
Michal

Reviewed-by: Michal Kubiak <michal.kubiak@intel.com>

> 
>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_main.c | 5 +++++
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_main.c
> index 3273aeb8fa67..ce7071e9af15 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_main.c
> @@ -5066,6 +5066,11 @@ static void iavf_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>  			mutex_unlock(&adapter->crit_lock);
>  			break;
>  		}
> +		/* Simply return if we already went through iavf_shutdown */
> +		if (adapter->state == __IAVF_REMOVE) {
> +			mutex_unlock(&adapter->crit_lock);
> +			return;
> +		}
>  
>  		mutex_unlock(&adapter->crit_lock);
>  		usleep_range(500, 1000);
> -- 
> 2.39.1
> 
_______________________________________________
Intel-wired-lan mailing list
Intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org
https://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-wired-lan

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Michal Kubiak <michal.kubiak@intel.com>
To: Stefan Assmann <sassmann@kpanic.de>
Cc: <intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	<anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>, <patryk.piotrowski@intel.com>,
	<slawomirx.laba@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] iavf: fix hang on reboot with ice
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2023 15:24:04 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZBCDhCjim+d4TmMD@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230313160645.3332457-1-sassmann@kpanic.de>

On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 05:06:45PM +0100, Stefan Assmann wrote:
> When a system with E810 with existing VFs gets rebooted the following
> hang may be observed.
> 
>  Pid 1 is hung in iavf_remove(), part of a network driver:
>  PID: 1        TASK: ffff965400e5a340  CPU: 24   COMMAND: "systemd-shutdow"
>   #0 [ffffaad04005fa50] __schedule at ffffffff8b3239cb
>   #1 [ffffaad04005fae8] schedule at ffffffff8b323e2d
>   #2 [ffffaad04005fb00] schedule_hrtimeout_range_clock at ffffffff8b32cebc
>   #3 [ffffaad04005fb80] usleep_range_state at ffffffff8b32c930
>   #4 [ffffaad04005fbb0] iavf_remove at ffffffffc12b9b4c [iavf]
>   #5 [ffffaad04005fbf0] pci_device_remove at ffffffff8add7513
>   #6 [ffffaad04005fc10] device_release_driver_internal at ffffffff8af08baa
>   #7 [ffffaad04005fc40] pci_stop_bus_device at ffffffff8adcc5fc
>   #8 [ffffaad04005fc60] pci_stop_and_remove_bus_device at ffffffff8adcc81e
>   #9 [ffffaad04005fc70] pci_iov_remove_virtfn at ffffffff8adf9429
>  #10 [ffffaad04005fca8] sriov_disable at ffffffff8adf98e4
>  #11 [ffffaad04005fcc8] ice_free_vfs at ffffffffc04bb2c8 [ice]
>  #12 [ffffaad04005fd10] ice_remove at ffffffffc04778fe [ice]
>  #13 [ffffaad04005fd38] ice_shutdown at ffffffffc0477946 [ice]
>  #14 [ffffaad04005fd50] pci_device_shutdown at ffffffff8add58f1
>  #15 [ffffaad04005fd70] device_shutdown at ffffffff8af05386
>  #16 [ffffaad04005fd98] kernel_restart at ffffffff8a92a870
>  #17 [ffffaad04005fda8] __do_sys_reboot at ffffffff8a92abd6
>  #18 [ffffaad04005fee0] do_syscall_64 at ffffffff8b317159
>  #19 [ffffaad04005ff08] __context_tracking_enter at ffffffff8b31b6fc
>  #20 [ffffaad04005ff18] syscall_exit_to_user_mode at ffffffff8b31b50d
>  #21 [ffffaad04005ff28] do_syscall_64 at ffffffff8b317169
>  #22 [ffffaad04005ff50] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe at ffffffff8b40009b
>      RIP: 00007f1baa5c13d7  RSP: 00007fffbcc55a98  RFLAGS: 00000202
>      RAX: ffffffffffffffda  RBX: 0000000000000000  RCX: 00007f1baa5c13d7
>      RDX: 0000000001234567  RSI: 0000000028121969  RDI: 00000000fee1dead
>      RBP: 00007fffbcc55ca0   R8: 0000000000000000   R9: 00007fffbcc54e90
>      R10: 00007fffbcc55050  R11: 0000000000000202  R12: 0000000000000005
>      R13: 0000000000000000  R14: 00007fffbcc55af0  R15: 0000000000000000
>      ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000a9  CS: 0033  SS: 002b
> 
> During reboot all drivers PM shutdown callbacks are invoked.
> In iavf_shutdown() the adapter state is changed to __IAVF_REMOVE.
> In ice_shutdown() the call chain above is executed, which at some point
> calls iavf_remove(). However iavf_remove() expects the VF to be in one
> of the states __IAVF_RUNNING, __IAVF_DOWN or __IAVF_INIT_FAILED. If
> that's not the case it sleeps forever.
> So if iavf_shutdown() gets invoked before iavf_remove() the system will
> hang indefinitely because the adapter is already in state __IAVF_REMOVE.
> 
> Fix this by returning from iavf_remove() if the state is __IAVF_REMOVE,
> as we already went through iavf_shutdown().
> 
> Fixes: 974578017fc1 ("iavf: Add waiting so the port is initialized in remove")
> Fixes: a8417330f8a5 ("iavf: Fix race condition between iavf_shutdown and iavf_remove")
> Reported-by: Marius Cornea <mcornea@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Assmann <sassmann@kpanic.de>
> ---
> v2: return instead of breaking the while (1) loop
>     This avoids going through remove code twice and is how things worked
>     before a8417330f8a5.

Good catch. Indeed there was such a logic before that patch.

Thanks,
Michal

Reviewed-by: Michal Kubiak <michal.kubiak@intel.com>

> 
>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_main.c | 5 +++++
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_main.c
> index 3273aeb8fa67..ce7071e9af15 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_main.c
> @@ -5066,6 +5066,11 @@ static void iavf_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>  			mutex_unlock(&adapter->crit_lock);
>  			break;
>  		}
> +		/* Simply return if we already went through iavf_shutdown */
> +		if (adapter->state == __IAVF_REMOVE) {
> +			mutex_unlock(&adapter->crit_lock);
> +			return;
> +		}
>  
>  		mutex_unlock(&adapter->crit_lock);
>  		usleep_range(500, 1000);
> -- 
> 2.39.1
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2023-03-14 15:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-13 16:06 [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net v2] iavf: fix hang on reboot with ice Stefan Assmann
2023-03-13 16:06 ` Stefan Assmann
2023-03-14 14:24 ` Michal Kubiak [this message]
2023-03-14 14:24   ` Michal Kubiak
2023-03-21  9:43   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Romanowski, Rafal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZBCDhCjim+d4TmMD@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=michal.kubiak@intel.com \
    --cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=patryk.piotrowski@intel.com \
    --cc=sassmann@kpanic.de \
    --cc=slawomirx.laba@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.