All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: "Philip Müller" <philm@manjaro.org>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [Regression] drm/i915: Don't use BAR mappings for ring buffers with LLC alone creates issues in stable kernels
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2023 08:12:19 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZBlY0yzJsT4k7bRL@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <efc7e85a-a170-ba1b-8746-b00784e81e39@manjaro.org>

On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 07:58:44AM +0700, Philip Müller wrote:
> On 20.03.23 20:28, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 19, 2023 at 10:01:01AM +0700, Philip Müller wrote:
> > > Have to correct the affected kernels to these: 4.14.310, 4.19.278, 5.4.237,
> > > 5.10.175
> > 
> > Please don't top-post :(
> > 
> > Anyway, should be fixed in the next round of releases in a few days, if
> > not, please let us know.
> > 
> > greg k-h
> 
> Hi Greg,
> 
> seems the RCs work out. 4.19.279-rc1 and 5.10.176-rc1 were tested by a user
> who had the issue on i915. In 5.15 series the drm patch got reverted. I only
> see "drm/i915: Don't use stolen memory for ring buffers with LLC" there as
> "drm/i915: Don't use BAR mappings for ring buffers with LLC" was reverted
> with 5.15.101.

So is 5.15.y ok or not?  Sorry, I could not parse your response here.

thanks,

greg k-h

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: "Philip Müller" <philm@manjaro.org>
Cc: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@intel.com>,
	Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
	Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
	Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
	Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Regression] drm/i915: Don't use BAR mappings for ring buffers with LLC alone creates issues in stable kernels
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2023 08:12:19 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZBlY0yzJsT4k7bRL@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <efc7e85a-a170-ba1b-8746-b00784e81e39@manjaro.org>

On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 07:58:44AM +0700, Philip Müller wrote:
> On 20.03.23 20:28, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 19, 2023 at 10:01:01AM +0700, Philip Müller wrote:
> > > Have to correct the affected kernels to these: 4.14.310, 4.19.278, 5.4.237,
> > > 5.10.175
> > 
> > Please don't top-post :(
> > 
> > Anyway, should be fixed in the next round of releases in a few days, if
> > not, please let us know.
> > 
> > greg k-h
> 
> Hi Greg,
> 
> seems the RCs work out. 4.19.279-rc1 and 5.10.176-rc1 were tested by a user
> who had the issue on i915. In 5.15 series the drm patch got reverted. I only
> see "drm/i915: Don't use stolen memory for ring buffers with LLC" there as
> "drm/i915: Don't use BAR mappings for ring buffers with LLC" was reverted
> with 5.15.101.

So is 5.15.y ok or not?  Sorry, I could not parse your response here.

thanks,

greg k-h

  reply	other threads:[~2023-03-21  7:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-19  2:48 [Regression] drm/i915: Don't use BAR mappings for ring buffers with LLC alone creates issues in stable kernels Philip Müller
2023-03-19  3:01 ` Philip Müller
2023-03-20 13:28   ` [Intel-gfx] " Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-03-20 13:28     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-03-21  0:58     ` [Intel-gfx] " Philip Müller
2023-03-21  0:58       ` Philip Müller
2023-03-21  7:12       ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2023-03-21  7:12         ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-03-21 12:16         ` [Intel-gfx] " Philip Müller
2023-03-21 12:16           ` Philip Müller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZBlY0yzJsT4k7bRL@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=philm@manjaro.org \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.