From: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
To: Chen Jiahao <chenjiahao16@huawei.com>
Cc: paul.walmsley@sifive.com, palmer@dabbelt.com,
conor.dooley@microchip.com, guoren@kernel.org, heiko@sntech.de,
bjorn@rivosinc.com, alex@ghiti.fr, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
atishp@rivosinc.com, thunder.leizhen@huawei.com,
horms@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next v2 1/2] riscv: kdump: Implement crashkernel=X,[high,low]
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2023 19:19:30 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZCQewkvSpaI52DSM@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230328115150.2700016-2-chenjiahao16@huawei.com>
On 03/28/23 at 07:51pm, Chen Jiahao wrote:
> On riscv, the current crash kernel allocation logic is trying to
> allocate within 32bit addressible memory region by default, if
> failed, try to allocate without 4G restriction.
>
> In need of saving DMA zone memory while allocating a relatively large
> crash kernel region, allocating the reserved memory top down in
> high memory, without overlapping the DMA zone, is a mature solution.
> Here introduce the parameter option crashkernel=X,[high,low].
>
> One can reserve the crash kernel from high memory above DMA zone range
> by explicitly passing "crashkernel=X,high"; or reserve a memory range
> below 4G with "crashkernel=X,low".
>
> Signed-off-by: Chen Jiahao <chenjiahao16@huawei.com>
> ---
> arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c | 5 ++++
> arch/riscv/mm/init.c | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 2 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
> index 5d3184cbf518..ea84e5047c23 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
> @@ -176,6 +176,11 @@ static void __init init_resources(void)
> if (ret < 0)
> goto error;
> }
> + if (crashk_low_res.start != crashk_low_res.end) {
> + ret = add_resource(&iomem_resource, &crashk_low_res);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + goto error;
> + }
> #endif
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/mm/init.c b/arch/riscv/mm/init.c
> index 478d6763a01a..b7708cc467fa 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/mm/init.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/mm/init.c
> @@ -1152,6 +1152,28 @@ static inline void setup_vm_final(void)
> }
> #endif /* CONFIG_MMU */
>
> +/* Reserve 128M low memory by default for swiotlb buffer */
> +#define DEFAULT_CRASH_KERNEL_LOW_SIZE (128UL << 20)
> +
> +static int __init reserve_crashkernel_low(unsigned long long low_size)
> +{
> + unsigned long long low_base;
> +
> + low_base = memblock_phys_alloc_range(low_size, PMD_SIZE, 0, dma32_phys_limit);
> + if (!low_base) {
> + pr_err("cannot allocate crashkernel low memory (size:0x%llx).\n", low_size);
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
> +
> + pr_info("crashkernel low memory reserved: 0x%016llx - 0x%016llx (%lld MB)\n",
> + low_base, low_base + low_size, low_size >> 20);
> +
> + crashk_low_res.start = low_base;
> + crashk_low_res.end = low_base + low_size - 1;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> /*
> * reserve_crashkernel() - reserves memory for crash kernel
> *
> @@ -1163,6 +1185,7 @@ static void __init reserve_crashkernel(void)
> {
> unsigned long long crash_base = 0;
> unsigned long long crash_size = 0;
> + unsigned long long crash_low_size = 0;
> unsigned long search_start = memblock_start_of_DRAM();
> unsigned long search_end = memblock_end_of_DRAM();
>
> @@ -1182,8 +1205,30 @@ static void __init reserve_crashkernel(void)
>
> ret = parse_crashkernel(boot_command_line, memblock_phys_mem_size(),
> &crash_size, &crash_base);
> - if (ret || !crash_size)
> + if (ret == -ENOENT) {
> + /*
> + * crashkernel=X,[high,low] can be specified or not, but
> + * invalid value is not allowed.
> + */
> + ret = parse_crashkernel_high(boot_command_line, 0, &crash_size, &crash_base);
I would add a local variable to assign boot_command_line to it just like
arm64 does. Then these lines could be shorter.
char *cmdline = boot_command_line;
> + if (ret || !crash_size)
> + return;
> +
> + /*
> + * crashkernel=Y,low is valid only when crashkernel=X,high
> + * is passed and high memory is reserved successful.
> + */
> + ret = parse_crashkernel_low(boot_command_line, 0, &crash_low_size, &crash_base);
> + if (ret == -ENOENT)
> + crash_low_size = DEFAULT_CRASH_KERNEL_LOW_SIZE;
> + else if (ret)
> + return;
> +
> + search_start = dma32_phys_limit;
> + } else if (ret || !crash_size) {
> + /* Invalid argument value specified */
> return;
> + }
>
> crash_size = PAGE_ALIGN(crash_size);
>
> @@ -1201,16 +1246,26 @@ static void __init reserve_crashkernel(void)
> */
> crash_base = memblock_phys_alloc_range(crash_size, PMD_SIZE,
> search_start,
> - min(search_end, (unsigned long) SZ_4G));
> + min(search_end, (unsigned long)dma32_phys_limit));
> if (crash_base == 0) {
The above conditional check isn't right. If crashkernel=size@offset
specified, the reservation failure won't trigger retry. This seems to be
originally introduced by old commit, while this need be fixed firstly.
> - /* Try again without restricting region to 32bit addressible memory */
> + /* Try again above the region of 32bit addressible memory */
> crash_base = memblock_phys_alloc_range(crash_size, PMD_SIZE,
> - search_start, search_end);
> + max(search_start, (unsigned long)dma32_phys_limit),
> + search_end);
> if (crash_base == 0) {
> pr_warn("crashkernel: couldn't allocate %lldKB\n",
> crash_size >> 10);
> return;
> }
> +
> + if (!crash_low_size)
> + crash_low_size = DEFAULT_CRASH_KERNEL_LOW_SIZE;
> + }
> +
> + if ((crash_base > dma32_phys_limit - crash_low_size) &&
> + crash_low_size && reserve_crashkernel_low(crash_low_size)) {
> + memblock_phys_free(crash_base, crash_size);
> + return;
> }
>
> pr_info("crashkernel: reserved 0x%016llx - 0x%016llx (%lld MB)\n",
> --
> 2.31.1
>
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
To: Chen Jiahao <chenjiahao16@huawei.com>
Cc: paul.walmsley@sifive.com, palmer@dabbelt.com,
conor.dooley@microchip.com, guoren@kernel.org, heiko@sntech.de,
bjorn@rivosinc.com, alex@ghiti.fr, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
atishp@rivosinc.com, thunder.leizhen@huawei.com,
horms@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next v2 1/2] riscv: kdump: Implement crashkernel=X,[high,low]
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2023 19:19:30 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZCQewkvSpaI52DSM@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230328115150.2700016-2-chenjiahao16@huawei.com>
On 03/28/23 at 07:51pm, Chen Jiahao wrote:
> On riscv, the current crash kernel allocation logic is trying to
> allocate within 32bit addressible memory region by default, if
> failed, try to allocate without 4G restriction.
>
> In need of saving DMA zone memory while allocating a relatively large
> crash kernel region, allocating the reserved memory top down in
> high memory, without overlapping the DMA zone, is a mature solution.
> Here introduce the parameter option crashkernel=X,[high,low].
>
> One can reserve the crash kernel from high memory above DMA zone range
> by explicitly passing "crashkernel=X,high"; or reserve a memory range
> below 4G with "crashkernel=X,low".
>
> Signed-off-by: Chen Jiahao <chenjiahao16@huawei.com>
> ---
> arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c | 5 ++++
> arch/riscv/mm/init.c | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 2 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
> index 5d3184cbf518..ea84e5047c23 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
> @@ -176,6 +176,11 @@ static void __init init_resources(void)
> if (ret < 0)
> goto error;
> }
> + if (crashk_low_res.start != crashk_low_res.end) {
> + ret = add_resource(&iomem_resource, &crashk_low_res);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + goto error;
> + }
> #endif
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/mm/init.c b/arch/riscv/mm/init.c
> index 478d6763a01a..b7708cc467fa 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/mm/init.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/mm/init.c
> @@ -1152,6 +1152,28 @@ static inline void setup_vm_final(void)
> }
> #endif /* CONFIG_MMU */
>
> +/* Reserve 128M low memory by default for swiotlb buffer */
> +#define DEFAULT_CRASH_KERNEL_LOW_SIZE (128UL << 20)
> +
> +static int __init reserve_crashkernel_low(unsigned long long low_size)
> +{
> + unsigned long long low_base;
> +
> + low_base = memblock_phys_alloc_range(low_size, PMD_SIZE, 0, dma32_phys_limit);
> + if (!low_base) {
> + pr_err("cannot allocate crashkernel low memory (size:0x%llx).\n", low_size);
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
> +
> + pr_info("crashkernel low memory reserved: 0x%016llx - 0x%016llx (%lld MB)\n",
> + low_base, low_base + low_size, low_size >> 20);
> +
> + crashk_low_res.start = low_base;
> + crashk_low_res.end = low_base + low_size - 1;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> /*
> * reserve_crashkernel() - reserves memory for crash kernel
> *
> @@ -1163,6 +1185,7 @@ static void __init reserve_crashkernel(void)
> {
> unsigned long long crash_base = 0;
> unsigned long long crash_size = 0;
> + unsigned long long crash_low_size = 0;
> unsigned long search_start = memblock_start_of_DRAM();
> unsigned long search_end = memblock_end_of_DRAM();
>
> @@ -1182,8 +1205,30 @@ static void __init reserve_crashkernel(void)
>
> ret = parse_crashkernel(boot_command_line, memblock_phys_mem_size(),
> &crash_size, &crash_base);
> - if (ret || !crash_size)
> + if (ret == -ENOENT) {
> + /*
> + * crashkernel=X,[high,low] can be specified or not, but
> + * invalid value is not allowed.
> + */
> + ret = parse_crashkernel_high(boot_command_line, 0, &crash_size, &crash_base);
I would add a local variable to assign boot_command_line to it just like
arm64 does. Then these lines could be shorter.
char *cmdline = boot_command_line;
> + if (ret || !crash_size)
> + return;
> +
> + /*
> + * crashkernel=Y,low is valid only when crashkernel=X,high
> + * is passed and high memory is reserved successful.
> + */
> + ret = parse_crashkernel_low(boot_command_line, 0, &crash_low_size, &crash_base);
> + if (ret == -ENOENT)
> + crash_low_size = DEFAULT_CRASH_KERNEL_LOW_SIZE;
> + else if (ret)
> + return;
> +
> + search_start = dma32_phys_limit;
> + } else if (ret || !crash_size) {
> + /* Invalid argument value specified */
> return;
> + }
>
> crash_size = PAGE_ALIGN(crash_size);
>
> @@ -1201,16 +1246,26 @@ static void __init reserve_crashkernel(void)
> */
> crash_base = memblock_phys_alloc_range(crash_size, PMD_SIZE,
> search_start,
> - min(search_end, (unsigned long) SZ_4G));
> + min(search_end, (unsigned long)dma32_phys_limit));
> if (crash_base == 0) {
The above conditional check isn't right. If crashkernel=size@offset
specified, the reservation failure won't trigger retry. This seems to be
originally introduced by old commit, while this need be fixed firstly.
> - /* Try again without restricting region to 32bit addressible memory */
> + /* Try again above the region of 32bit addressible memory */
> crash_base = memblock_phys_alloc_range(crash_size, PMD_SIZE,
> - search_start, search_end);
> + max(search_start, (unsigned long)dma32_phys_limit),
> + search_end);
> if (crash_base == 0) {
> pr_warn("crashkernel: couldn't allocate %lldKB\n",
> crash_size >> 10);
> return;
> }
> +
> + if (!crash_low_size)
> + crash_low_size = DEFAULT_CRASH_KERNEL_LOW_SIZE;
> + }
> +
> + if ((crash_base > dma32_phys_limit - crash_low_size) &&
> + crash_low_size && reserve_crashkernel_low(crash_low_size)) {
> + memblock_phys_free(crash_base, crash_size);
> + return;
> }
>
> pr_info("crashkernel: reserved 0x%016llx - 0x%016llx (%lld MB)\n",
> --
> 2.31.1
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
To: Chen Jiahao <chenjiahao16@huawei.com>
Cc: paul.walmsley@sifive.com, palmer@dabbelt.com,
conor.dooley@microchip.com, guoren@kernel.org, heiko@sntech.de,
bjorn@rivosinc.com, alex@ghiti.fr, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
atishp@rivosinc.com, thunder.leizhen@huawei.com,
horms@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next v2 1/2] riscv: kdump: Implement crashkernel=X,[high,low]
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2023 19:19:30 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZCQewkvSpaI52DSM@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230328115150.2700016-2-chenjiahao16@huawei.com>
On 03/28/23 at 07:51pm, Chen Jiahao wrote:
> On riscv, the current crash kernel allocation logic is trying to
> allocate within 32bit addressible memory region by default, if
> failed, try to allocate without 4G restriction.
>
> In need of saving DMA zone memory while allocating a relatively large
> crash kernel region, allocating the reserved memory top down in
> high memory, without overlapping the DMA zone, is a mature solution.
> Here introduce the parameter option crashkernel=X,[high,low].
>
> One can reserve the crash kernel from high memory above DMA zone range
> by explicitly passing "crashkernel=X,high"; or reserve a memory range
> below 4G with "crashkernel=X,low".
>
> Signed-off-by: Chen Jiahao <chenjiahao16@huawei.com>
> ---
> arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c | 5 ++++
> arch/riscv/mm/init.c | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 2 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
> index 5d3184cbf518..ea84e5047c23 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
> @@ -176,6 +176,11 @@ static void __init init_resources(void)
> if (ret < 0)
> goto error;
> }
> + if (crashk_low_res.start != crashk_low_res.end) {
> + ret = add_resource(&iomem_resource, &crashk_low_res);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + goto error;
> + }
> #endif
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/mm/init.c b/arch/riscv/mm/init.c
> index 478d6763a01a..b7708cc467fa 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/mm/init.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/mm/init.c
> @@ -1152,6 +1152,28 @@ static inline void setup_vm_final(void)
> }
> #endif /* CONFIG_MMU */
>
> +/* Reserve 128M low memory by default for swiotlb buffer */
> +#define DEFAULT_CRASH_KERNEL_LOW_SIZE (128UL << 20)
> +
> +static int __init reserve_crashkernel_low(unsigned long long low_size)
> +{
> + unsigned long long low_base;
> +
> + low_base = memblock_phys_alloc_range(low_size, PMD_SIZE, 0, dma32_phys_limit);
> + if (!low_base) {
> + pr_err("cannot allocate crashkernel low memory (size:0x%llx).\n", low_size);
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
> +
> + pr_info("crashkernel low memory reserved: 0x%016llx - 0x%016llx (%lld MB)\n",
> + low_base, low_base + low_size, low_size >> 20);
> +
> + crashk_low_res.start = low_base;
> + crashk_low_res.end = low_base + low_size - 1;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> /*
> * reserve_crashkernel() - reserves memory for crash kernel
> *
> @@ -1163,6 +1185,7 @@ static void __init reserve_crashkernel(void)
> {
> unsigned long long crash_base = 0;
> unsigned long long crash_size = 0;
> + unsigned long long crash_low_size = 0;
> unsigned long search_start = memblock_start_of_DRAM();
> unsigned long search_end = memblock_end_of_DRAM();
>
> @@ -1182,8 +1205,30 @@ static void __init reserve_crashkernel(void)
>
> ret = parse_crashkernel(boot_command_line, memblock_phys_mem_size(),
> &crash_size, &crash_base);
> - if (ret || !crash_size)
> + if (ret == -ENOENT) {
> + /*
> + * crashkernel=X,[high,low] can be specified or not, but
> + * invalid value is not allowed.
> + */
> + ret = parse_crashkernel_high(boot_command_line, 0, &crash_size, &crash_base);
I would add a local variable to assign boot_command_line to it just like
arm64 does. Then these lines could be shorter.
char *cmdline = boot_command_line;
> + if (ret || !crash_size)
> + return;
> +
> + /*
> + * crashkernel=Y,low is valid only when crashkernel=X,high
> + * is passed and high memory is reserved successful.
> + */
> + ret = parse_crashkernel_low(boot_command_line, 0, &crash_low_size, &crash_base);
> + if (ret == -ENOENT)
> + crash_low_size = DEFAULT_CRASH_KERNEL_LOW_SIZE;
> + else if (ret)
> + return;
> +
> + search_start = dma32_phys_limit;
> + } else if (ret || !crash_size) {
> + /* Invalid argument value specified */
> return;
> + }
>
> crash_size = PAGE_ALIGN(crash_size);
>
> @@ -1201,16 +1246,26 @@ static void __init reserve_crashkernel(void)
> */
> crash_base = memblock_phys_alloc_range(crash_size, PMD_SIZE,
> search_start,
> - min(search_end, (unsigned long) SZ_4G));
> + min(search_end, (unsigned long)dma32_phys_limit));
> if (crash_base == 0) {
The above conditional check isn't right. If crashkernel=size@offset
specified, the reservation failure won't trigger retry. This seems to be
originally introduced by old commit, while this need be fixed firstly.
> - /* Try again without restricting region to 32bit addressible memory */
> + /* Try again above the region of 32bit addressible memory */
> crash_base = memblock_phys_alloc_range(crash_size, PMD_SIZE,
> - search_start, search_end);
> + max(search_start, (unsigned long)dma32_phys_limit),
> + search_end);
> if (crash_base == 0) {
> pr_warn("crashkernel: couldn't allocate %lldKB\n",
> crash_size >> 10);
> return;
> }
> +
> + if (!crash_low_size)
> + crash_low_size = DEFAULT_CRASH_KERNEL_LOW_SIZE;
> + }
> +
> + if ((crash_base > dma32_phys_limit - crash_low_size) &&
> + crash_low_size && reserve_crashkernel_low(crash_low_size)) {
> + memblock_phys_free(crash_base, crash_size);
> + return;
> }
>
> pr_info("crashkernel: reserved 0x%016llx - 0x%016llx (%lld MB)\n",
> --
> 2.31.1
>
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-29 11:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-28 11:51 [PATCH -next v2 0/2] support allocating crashkernel above 4G explicitly on riscv Chen Jiahao
2023-03-28 11:51 ` Chen Jiahao
2023-03-28 11:51 ` Chen Jiahao
2023-03-28 11:51 ` [PATCH -next v2 1/2] riscv: kdump: Implement crashkernel=X,[high,low] Chen Jiahao
2023-03-28 11:51 ` Chen Jiahao
2023-03-28 11:51 ` Chen Jiahao
2023-03-29 11:19 ` Baoquan He [this message]
2023-03-29 11:19 ` Baoquan He
2023-03-29 11:19 ` Baoquan He
2023-03-30 13:40 ` chenjiahao (C)
2023-03-30 13:40 ` chenjiahao (C)
2023-03-30 13:40 ` chenjiahao (C)
2023-03-30 23:32 ` Baoquan He
2023-03-30 23:32 ` Baoquan He
2023-03-30 23:32 ` Baoquan He
2023-03-31 11:36 ` chenjiahao (C)
2023-03-31 11:36 ` chenjiahao (C)
2023-03-31 11:36 ` chenjiahao (C)
2023-03-28 11:51 ` [PATCH -next v2 2/2] docs: kdump: Update the crashkernel description for riscv Chen Jiahao
2023-03-28 11:51 ` Chen Jiahao
2023-03-28 11:51 ` Chen Jiahao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZCQewkvSpaI52DSM@MiWiFi-R3L-srv \
--to=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alex@ghiti.fr \
--cc=atishp@rivosinc.com \
--cc=bjorn@rivosinc.com \
--cc=chenjiahao16@huawei.com \
--cc=conor.dooley@microchip.com \
--cc=guoren@kernel.org \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=thunder.leizhen@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.