From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 19/31] drm/xe: Reduce the number list links in xe_vma
Date: Mon, 8 May 2023 17:43:50 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZFltFm99mI7OcsCm@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230502001727.3211096-20-matthew.brost@intel.com>
On Mon, May 01, 2023 at 05:17:15PM -0700, Matthew Brost wrote:
> 5 list links in can be squashed into a union in xe_vma as being on the
> various list is mutually exclusive.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_pagefault.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c | 5 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c | 29 ++++++------
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm_types.h | 71 +++++++++++++++-------------
> 4 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_pagefault.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_pagefault.c
> index cfffe3398fe4..d7bf6b0a0697 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_pagefault.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_pagefault.c
> @@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ static int handle_pagefault(struct xe_gt *gt, struct pagefault *pf)
>
> if (xe_vma_is_userptr(vma) && write_locked) {
> spin_lock(&vm->userptr.invalidated_lock);
> - list_del_init(&vma->userptr.invalidate_link);
> + list_del_init(&vma->invalidate_link);
> spin_unlock(&vm->userptr.invalidated_lock);
>
> ret = xe_vma_userptr_pin_pages(vma);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c
> index 010f44260cda..8eab8e1bbaf0 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c
> @@ -1116,8 +1116,7 @@ static int xe_pt_userptr_inject_eagain(struct xe_vma *vma)
>
> vma->userptr.divisor = divisor << 1;
> spin_lock(&vm->userptr.invalidated_lock);
> - list_move_tail(&vma->userptr.invalidate_link,
> - &vm->userptr.invalidated);
> + list_move_tail(&vma->invalidate_link, &vm->userptr.invalidated);
> spin_unlock(&vm->userptr.invalidated_lock);
> return true;
> }
> @@ -1724,7 +1723,7 @@ __xe_pt_unbind_vma(struct xe_gt *gt, struct xe_vma *vma, struct xe_engine *e,
>
> if (!vma->gt_present) {
> spin_lock(&vm->userptr.invalidated_lock);
> - list_del_init(&vma->userptr.invalidate_link);
> + list_del_init(&vma->invalidate_link);
> spin_unlock(&vm->userptr.invalidated_lock);
> }
> up_read(&vm->userptr.notifier_lock);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
> index e0ed7201aeb0..e5f2fffb2aec 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
> @@ -677,8 +677,7 @@ static bool vma_userptr_invalidate(struct mmu_interval_notifier *mni,
> if (!xe_vm_in_fault_mode(vm) &&
> !(vma->gpuva.flags & XE_VMA_DESTROYED) && vma->gt_present) {
> spin_lock(&vm->userptr.invalidated_lock);
> - list_move_tail(&vma->userptr.invalidate_link,
> - &vm->userptr.invalidated);
> + list_move_tail(&vma->invalidate_link, &vm->userptr.invalidated);
> spin_unlock(&vm->userptr.invalidated_lock);
> }
>
> @@ -726,8 +725,8 @@ int xe_vm_userptr_pin(struct xe_vm *vm)
> /* Collect invalidated userptrs */
> spin_lock(&vm->userptr.invalidated_lock);
> list_for_each_entry_safe(vma, next, &vm->userptr.invalidated,
> - userptr.invalidate_link) {
> - list_del_init(&vma->userptr.invalidate_link);
> + invalidate_link) {
> + list_del_init(&vma->invalidate_link);
> list_move_tail(&vma->userptr_link, &vm->userptr.repin_list);
> }
> spin_unlock(&vm->userptr.invalidated_lock);
> @@ -830,12 +829,11 @@ static struct xe_vma *xe_vma_create(struct xe_vm *vm,
> return vma;
> }
>
> - /* FIXME: Way to many lists, should be able to reduce this */
> + /*
> + * userptr_link, destroy_link, notifier.rebind_link,
> + * invalidate_link
> + */
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vma->rebind_link);
> - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vma->unbind_link);
> - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vma->userptr_link);
> - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vma->userptr.invalidate_link);
> - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vma->notifier.rebind_link);
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vma->extobj.link);
>
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vma->gpuva.gem.entry);
> @@ -953,15 +951,14 @@ static void xe_vma_destroy(struct xe_vma *vma, struct dma_fence *fence)
> struct xe_vm *vm = xe_vma_vm(vma);
>
> lockdep_assert_held_write(&vm->lock);
> - XE_BUG_ON(!list_empty(&vma->unbind_link));
>
> if (xe_vma_is_userptr(vma)) {
> XE_WARN_ON(!(vma->gpuva.flags & XE_VMA_DESTROYED));
>
> spin_lock(&vm->userptr.invalidated_lock);
> - list_del_init(&vma->userptr.invalidate_link);
> + if (!list_empty(&vma->invalidate_link))
> + list_del_init(&vma->invalidate_link);
> spin_unlock(&vm->userptr.invalidated_lock);
> - list_del(&vma->userptr_link);
> } else if (!xe_vma_is_null(vma)) {
> xe_bo_assert_held(xe_vma_bo(vma));
> drm_gpuva_unlink(&vma->gpuva);
> @@ -1328,7 +1325,9 @@ void xe_vm_close_and_put(struct xe_vm *vm)
> continue;
> }
>
> - list_add_tail(&vma->unbind_link, &contested);
> + if (!list_empty(&vma->destroy_link))
> + list_del_init(&vma->destroy_link);
> + list_add_tail(&vma->destroy_link, &contested);
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -1356,8 +1355,8 @@ void xe_vm_close_and_put(struct xe_vm *vm)
> * Since we hold a refcount to the bo, we can remove and free
> * the members safely without locking.
> */
> - list_for_each_entry_safe(vma, next_vma, &contested, unbind_link) {
> - list_del_init(&vma->unbind_link);
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(vma, next_vma, &contested, destroy_link) {
> + list_del_init(&vma->destroy_link);
> xe_vma_destroy_unlocked(vma);
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm_types.h
> index d55ec8156caa..22def5483c12 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm_types.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm_types.h
> @@ -50,21 +50,32 @@ struct xe_vma {
> */
> u64 gt_present;
>
> - /** @userptr_link: link into VM repin list if userptr */
> - struct list_head userptr_link;
> + union {
> + /** @userptr_link: link into VM repin list if userptr */
> + struct list_head userptr_link;
>
> - /**
> - * @rebind_link: link into VM if this VMA needs rebinding, and
> - * if it's a bo (not userptr) needs validation after a possible
> - * eviction. Protected by the vm's resv lock.
> - */
> - struct list_head rebind_link;
> + /**
> + * @rebind_link: link into VM if this VMA needs rebinding, and
> + * if it's a bo (not userptr) needs validation after a possible
> + * eviction. Protected by the vm's resv lock.
> + */
> + struct list_head rebind_link;
>
> - /**
> - * @unbind_link: link or list head if an unbind of multiple VMAs, in
> - * single unbind op, is being done.
> - */
> - struct list_head unbind_link;
> + /** @destroy_link: link for contested VMAs on VM close */
> + struct list_head destroy_link;
> +
> + /** @invalidate_link: Link for the vm::userptr.invalidated list */
> + struct list_head invalidate_link;
> +
> + struct {
> + /*
> + * @notifier.rebind_link: link for
> + * vm->notifier.rebind_list, protected by
> + * vm->notifier.list_lock
> + */
> + struct list_head rebind_link;
> + } notifier;
> + };
>
> /** @destroy_cb: callback to destroy VMA when unbind job is done */
> struct dma_fence_cb destroy_cb;
> @@ -72,10 +83,22 @@ struct xe_vma {
> /** @destroy_work: worker to destroy this BO */
> struct work_struct destroy_work;
>
> + /** @usm: unified shared memory state */
> + struct {
> + /** @gt_invalidated: VMA has been invalidated */
> + u64 gt_invalidated;
> + } usm;
> +
> + struct {
> + /**
> + * @extobj.link: Link into vm's external object list.
> + * protected by the vm lock.
> + */
> + struct list_head link;
> + } extobj;
> +
> /** @userptr: user pointer state */
> struct {
> - /** @invalidate_link: Link for the vm::userptr.invalidated list */
> - struct list_head invalidate_link;
> /**
> * @notifier: MMU notifier for user pointer (invalidation call back)
> */
> @@ -96,24 +119,6 @@ struct xe_vma {
> u32 divisor;
> #endif
> } userptr;
> -
> - /** @usm: unified shared memory state */
> - struct {
> - /** @gt_invalidated: VMA has been invalidated */
> - u64 gt_invalidated;
> - } usm;
> -
> - struct {
> - struct list_head rebind_link;
> - } notifier;
> -
> - struct {
> - /**
> - * @extobj.link: Link into vm's external object list.
> - * protected by the vm lock.
> - */
> - struct list_head link;
> - } extobj;
> };
>
> struct xe_device;
> --
> 2.34.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-08 21:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 126+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-02 0:16 [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 00/31] Upstreaming prep / all of mbrosts patches Matthew Brost
2023-05-02 0:16 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 01/31] drm/sched: Add run_wq argument to drm_sched_init Matthew Brost
2023-05-03 12:03 ` Thomas Hellström
2023-05-03 15:06 ` Matthew Brost
2023-05-05 18:24 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-05-02 0:16 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 02/31] drm/sched: Move schedule policy to scheduler Matthew Brost
2023-05-03 12:13 ` Thomas Hellström
2023-05-03 15:11 ` Matthew Brost
2023-05-02 0:16 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 03/31] drm/sched: Add DRM_SCHED_POLICY_SINGLE_ENTITY scheduling policy Matthew Brost
2023-05-08 12:40 ` Thomas Hellström
2023-05-22 1:16 ` Matthew Brost
2023-05-02 0:17 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 04/31] drm/xe: Use DRM_SCHED_POLICY_SINGLE_ENTITY mode Matthew Brost
2023-05-08 12:41 ` Thomas Hellström
2023-05-02 0:17 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 05/31] drm/xe: Long running job update Matthew Brost
2023-05-05 18:36 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-05-08 1:14 ` Matthew Brost
2023-05-08 13:14 ` Thomas Hellström
2023-05-09 14:56 ` Matthew Brost
2023-05-09 15:21 ` Thomas Hellström
2023-05-09 22:16 ` Matthew Brost
2023-05-10 8:15 ` Thomas Hellström
2023-05-09 22:21 ` Matthew Brost
2023-05-02 0:17 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 06/31] drm/xe: Ensure LR engines are not persistent Matthew Brost
2023-05-05 18:38 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-05-08 1:03 ` Matthew Brost
2023-05-09 12:21 ` Thomas Hellström
2023-05-02 0:17 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 07/31] drm/xe: Only try to lock external BOs in VM bind Matthew Brost
2023-05-05 18:40 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-05-08 1:08 ` Matthew Brost
2023-05-08 1:15 ` Christopher Snowhill
2023-05-08 21:34 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-05-09 12:29 ` Thomas Hellström
2023-05-10 23:25 ` Matthew Brost
2023-05-11 7:43 ` Thomas Hellström
2023-05-08 1:17 ` Christopher Snowhill
2023-05-02 0:17 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 08/31] drm/xe: VM LRU bulk move Matthew Brost
2023-05-08 21:39 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-05-09 22:09 ` Matthew Brost
2023-05-10 1:37 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-05-09 12:47 ` Thomas Hellström
2023-05-09 22:05 ` Matthew Brost
2023-05-10 8:14 ` Thomas Hellström
2023-05-10 18:40 ` Matthew Brost
2023-05-11 7:24 ` Thomas Hellström
2023-05-11 14:11 ` Matthew Brost
2023-05-12 9:03 ` Thomas Hellström
2023-05-02 0:17 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 09/31] drm/xe/guc: Read HXG fields from DW1 of G2H response Matthew Brost
2023-05-05 18:50 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-05-09 12:49 ` Thomas Hellström
2023-05-02 0:17 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 10/31] drm/xe/guc: Return the lower part of blocking H2G message Matthew Brost
2023-05-05 18:52 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-05-08 1:10 ` Matthew Brost
2023-05-08 9:20 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2023-05-02 0:17 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 11/31] drm/xe/guc: Use doorbells for submission if possible Matthew Brost
2023-05-08 21:42 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-05-10 0:49 ` Matthew Brost
2023-05-09 13:00 ` Thomas Hellström
2023-05-10 0:51 ` Matthew Brost
2023-05-21 12:32 ` Oded Gabbay
2023-06-08 19:30 ` Matthew Brost
2023-06-12 13:01 ` Oded Gabbay
2023-05-02 0:17 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 12/31] drm/xe/guc: Print doorbell ID in GuC engine debugfs entry Matthew Brost
2023-05-05 18:55 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-05-09 13:01 ` Thomas Hellström
2023-05-02 0:17 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 13/31] maple_tree: split up MA_STATE() macro Matthew Brost
2023-05-09 13:21 ` Thomas Hellström
2023-05-10 0:29 ` Matthew Brost
2023-05-02 0:17 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 14/31] maple_tree: Export mas_preallocate Matthew Brost
2023-05-09 13:33 ` Thomas Hellström
2023-05-10 0:31 ` Matthew Brost
2023-05-02 0:17 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 15/31] drm: manager to keep track of GPUs VA mappings Matthew Brost
2023-05-09 13:49 ` Thomas Hellström
2023-05-10 0:55 ` Matthew Brost
2023-05-02 0:17 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 16/31] drm/xe: Port Xe to GPUVA Matthew Brost
2023-05-09 13:52 ` Thomas Hellström
2023-05-11 2:41 ` Matthew Brost
2023-05-11 7:39 ` Thomas Hellström
2023-05-02 0:17 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 17/31] drm/xe: NULL binding implementation Matthew Brost
2023-05-09 14:34 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-05-11 2:52 ` Matthew Brost
2023-05-09 15:17 ` Thomas Hellström
2023-05-02 0:17 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 18/31] drm/xe: Avoid doing rebinds Matthew Brost
2023-05-09 14:48 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-05-02 0:17 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 19/31] drm/xe: Reduce the number list links in xe_vma Matthew Brost
2023-05-08 21:43 ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2023-05-11 8:38 ` Thomas Hellström
2023-05-02 0:17 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 20/31] drm/xe: Optimize size of xe_vma allocation Matthew Brost
2023-05-05 19:37 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-05-08 1:21 ` Matthew Brost
2023-05-11 9:05 ` Thomas Hellström
2023-05-02 0:17 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 21/31] drm/gpuva: Add drm device to GPUVA manager Matthew Brost
2023-05-05 19:39 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-05-11 9:06 ` Thomas Hellström
2023-05-02 0:17 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 22/31] drm/gpuva: Move dma-resv " Matthew Brost
2023-05-11 9:10 ` Thomas Hellström
2023-05-02 0:17 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 23/31] drm/gpuva: Add support for extobj Matthew Brost
2023-05-11 9:35 ` Thomas Hellström
2023-05-02 0:17 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 24/31] drm/xe: Userptr refactor Matthew Brost
2023-05-05 19:41 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-05-11 9:46 ` Thomas Hellström
2023-05-02 0:17 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 25/31] drm: execution context for GEM buffers v3 Matthew Brost
2023-05-02 0:17 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 26/31] drm/exec: Always compile drm_exec Matthew Brost
2023-05-09 14:45 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-05-10 0:37 ` Matthew Brost
2023-05-10 0:38 ` Matthew Brost
2023-05-02 0:17 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 27/31] drm/xe: Use drm_exec for locking rather than TTM exec helpers Matthew Brost
2023-05-05 19:42 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-05-11 10:01 ` Thomas Hellström
2023-05-02 0:17 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 28/31] drm/xe: Allow dma-fences as in-syncs for compute / faulting VM Matthew Brost
2023-05-05 19:43 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-05-08 1:19 ` Matthew Brost
2023-05-08 21:29 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-05-11 10:03 ` Thomas Hellström
2023-05-02 0:17 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 29/31] drm/xe: Allow compute VMs to output dma-fences on binds Matthew Brost
2023-05-09 14:50 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-05-11 10:04 ` Thomas Hellström
2023-05-02 0:17 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 30/31] drm/xe: remove async worker, sync binds, new error handling Matthew Brost
2023-05-17 16:53 ` Thomas Hellström
2023-05-02 0:17 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 31/31] drm/xe/uapi: Add some VM bind kernel doc Matthew Brost
2023-05-05 19:45 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-05-11 10:14 ` Thomas Hellström
2023-05-02 0:20 ` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.Patch_applied: failure for Upstreaming prep / all of mbrosts patches (rev2) Patchwork
2023-05-02 1:54 ` Christopher Snowhill (kode54)
2023-05-02 1:59 ` Christopher Snowhill (kode54)
2023-05-03 12:37 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 00/31] Upstreaming prep / all of mbrosts patches Thomas Hellström
2023-05-03 15:27 ` Matthew Brost
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZFltFm99mI7OcsCm@intel.com \
--to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.