Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v15 0/1] drm/i915: Allow user to set cache at BO creation

[Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>]

On Mon, Jun 05, 2023 at 10:16:22AM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> 
> On 05/06/2023 09:53, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> > 
> > On 31/05/2023 18:10, fei.yang@intel.com wrote:
> > > From: Fei Yang <fei.yang@intel.com>
> > > 
> > > This series introduce a new extension for GEM_CREATE,
> > > 1. end support for set caching ioctl [PATCH 1/2]
> > > 2. add set_pat extension for gem_create [PATCH 2/2]
> > > 
> > > v2: drop one patch that was merged separately
> > >      commit 341ad0e8e254 ("drm/i915/mtl: Add PTE encode function")
> > > v3: rebased on https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/117082/
> > > v4: fix missing unlock introduced in v3, and
> > >      solve a rebase conflict
> > > v5: replace obj->cache_level with pat_set_by_user,
> > >      fix i915_cache_level_str() for legacy platforms.
> > > v6: rebased on https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/117480/
> > > v7: rebased on https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/117528/
> > > v8: dropped the two dependent patches that has been merged
> > >      separately. Add IGT link and Tested-by (MESA).
> > > v9: addressing comments (Andi)
> > > v10: acked-by and tested-by MESA
> > > v11: drop "end support for set caching ioctl" (merged)
> > >       remove tools/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h
> > > v12: drop Bspec reference in comment. add to commit message instead
> > > v13: sent to test with igt@gem_create@create-ext-set-pat
> > > v14: sent to test with igt@gem_create@create-ext-set-pat
> > > v15: update commit message with documentation note and t-b/a-b from
> > >       Media driver folks.
> > > 
> > > Fei Yang (1):
> > >    drm/i915: Allow user to set cache at BO creation
> > > 
> > >   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_create.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++
> > >   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.c |  6 ++++
> > >   include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h                | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >   3 files changed, 83 insertions(+)
> > > 
> > 
> > Try with:
> > 
> > Test-with: 20230526172221.1438998-1-fei.yang@intel.com
> > 
> > That is how it is supposed to be done, to do a CI run against a test
> > case not yet merged that is.
> 
> Or I see that IGT has been since merged so you probably have results
> already?

CI has stopped somewhere in the BAT tests. Can anyone hit the
"Test revision 1 again" button? Fei, would you?

We had it tested some revisions back, though.

Andi