All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH 3/3] block: fail writes to read-only devices
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2023 12:13:39 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZH9bMx10optlZZlf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230601072829.1258286-4-hch@lst.de>

On Thu, Jun 01 2023 at  3:28P -0400,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> wrote:

> Currently callers can happily submit writes to block devices that are
> marked read-only, including to drivers that don't even support writes
> and will crash when fed such bios.
> 
> While bio submitter should check for read-only devices, that's not a
> very robust way of dealing with this.
> 
> Note that the last attempt to do this got reverted by Linus in commit
> a32e236eb93e ("Partially revert "block: fail op_is_write() requests to
> read-only partitions") because device mapper relyied on not enforcing
> the read-only state when used together with older lvm-tools.
> 
> The lvm side got fixed in:
> 
>     https://sourceware.org/git/?p=lvm2.git;a=commit;h=a6fdb9d9d70f51c49ad11a87ab4243344e6701a3
> 
> but if people still have older lvm2 tools in use we probably need
> to find a workaround for this in device mapper rather than lacking
> the core block layer checks.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

Reviewed-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@kernel.org>

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	dm-devel@redhat.com, linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] block: fail writes to read-only devices
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2023 12:13:39 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZH9bMx10optlZZlf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230601072829.1258286-4-hch@lst.de>

On Thu, Jun 01 2023 at  3:28P -0400,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> wrote:

> Currently callers can happily submit writes to block devices that are
> marked read-only, including to drivers that don't even support writes
> and will crash when fed such bios.
> 
> While bio submitter should check for read-only devices, that's not a
> very robust way of dealing with this.
> 
> Note that the last attempt to do this got reverted by Linus in commit
> a32e236eb93e ("Partially revert "block: fail op_is_write() requests to
> read-only partitions") because device mapper relyied on not enforcing
> the read-only state when used together with older lvm-tools.
> 
> The lvm side got fixed in:
> 
>     https://sourceware.org/git/?p=lvm2.git;a=commit;h=a6fdb9d9d70f51c49ad11a87ab4243344e6701a3
> 
> but if people still have older lvm2 tools in use we probably need
> to find a workaround for this in device mapper rather than lacking
> the core block layer checks.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

Reviewed-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@kernel.org>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-06-06 16:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-06-01  7:28 [dm-devel] enforce read-only state at the block layer Christoph Hellwig
2023-06-01  7:28 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-06-01  7:28 ` [dm-devel] [PATCH 1/3] block: remove a duplicate bdev_read_only declaration Christoph Hellwig
2023-06-01  7:28   ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-06-01  7:28 ` [dm-devel] [PATCH 2/3] block: simplify the check for flushes in bio_check_ro Christoph Hellwig
2023-06-01  7:28   ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-06-01  7:28 ` [dm-devel] [PATCH 3/3] block: fail writes to read-only devices Christoph Hellwig
2023-06-01  7:28   ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-06-02  1:02   ` [dm-devel] " Linus Torvalds
2023-06-02  1:02     ` Linus Torvalds
2023-06-02 15:41     ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2023-06-02 15:41       ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-06-02 15:56       ` [dm-devel] " Linus Torvalds
2023-06-02 15:56         ` Linus Torvalds
2023-06-06 16:13   ` Mike Snitzer [this message]
2023-06-06 16:13     ` Mike Snitzer
2023-06-06 16:11 ` [dm-devel] enforce read-only state at the block layer Mike Snitzer
2023-06-06 16:11   ` Mike Snitzer
2023-06-07  5:33   ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2023-06-07  5:33     ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZH9bMx10optlZZlf@redhat.com \
    --to=snitzer@kernel.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.